Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Point-of-care Ultrasound-guided Infiltration for Subacromial and Carpal Tunnel Syndromes in Primary Care: a Cluster-randomized Study Protocol.
Q-EPICAP
3 other identifiers
interventional
225
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether point-of-care ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection is more effective than conventional injection guided by anatomical landmarks or standard oral medication for patients with upper-extremity conditions (subacromial impingement syndrome \[SAS\] or carpal tunnel syndrome \[CTS\]) in primary care. The main questions this study seeks to answer are: Does ultrasound-guided injection provide superior long-term pain relief compared to blind anatomical injection and oral medication? Does ultrasound-guided injection lead to better functional recovery and improved health-related quality of life in patients? Is ultrasound-guided injection a cost-effective strategy from both the healthcare system and societal perspectives (including reducing sick leave)? This study represents the quantitative phase of the mixed-methods Q-EPICAP study. Researchers will compare three parallel groups across 23 primary care centers to determine the most effective and efficient treatment strategy. Participants will: Receive one of three assigned treatments: blind anatomical infiltration (Group I), ultrasound-guided infiltration (Group UI), or standard oral drug therapy (Group P). Attend follow-up assessments at baseline and at 15, 30, 90, and 180 days after the initial intervention. Complete questionnaires to assess pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), upper limb function (ASES or Boston Disability Assessment Questionnaire), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Provide data on medical resource utilization and sick leave to assess socioeconomic costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2028
July 9, 2026
July 1, 2026
1.6 years
July 2, 2026
July 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in Pain Intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where patients rate their pain on a line from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The primary endpoint is the change in the score from baseline to 3, 6, and 9 months. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Baseline (Day 0), 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months post-intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in Shoulder Function using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score
Baseline (Day 0), 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention.
Change from Baseline in Carpal Tunnel Symptoms and Function using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Baseline (Day 0), 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention.
Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
Baseline (Day 0), 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention.
Study Arms (3)
Standard Oral Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this cohort are treated exclusively with standard systemic oral drug treatment of routine clinical practice and physiotherapy recommendations according to established clinical guidelines, without receiving local procedures.
Conventional Infiltration
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this cohort receive a corticosteroid infiltration, blinded to anatomical landmarks, for subacromial impingement syndrome or carpal tunnel syndrome, administered by primary care physicians following standard clinical practice.
Ultrasound-Guided Infiltration
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this cohort receive an ultrasound-guided corticosteroid infiltration, performed by advanced-trained primary care physicians, ensuring anatomical accuracy during the procedure, and following standard clinical practice.
Interventions
Prescription of systemic oral pharmacological treatment according to standard clinical practice and guidelines, which may include individual or combined use of the following therapies, or no pharmacological prescription if deemed appropriate by the clinician: 1. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Ibuprofen (400 mg or 600 mg), Naproxen (500 mg or 550 mg), or Dexketoprofen (25 mg). 2. Non-opioid analgesics: Paracetamol (500 mg, 650 mg, or 1 g) or Metamizole (575 mg). 3. Step 2 weak opioids: Tramadol (50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg). 4. Co-analgesics for neuropathic pain components: Gabapentin (300 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg).
Local infiltration consisting of a combination of a corticosteroid and a local anesthetic, administered in a 1:1 volume ratio (1 ml + 1 ml, total volume 2 ml): 1. Corticosteroid: Betamethasone (administered as 1 ml of solution). 2. Local anesthetic: Mepivacaine (administered as 1 ml of solution). In the Conventional Infiltration group, the solution is injected using the standard anatomical landmark technique (blind technique).
Local infiltration consisting of a combination of a corticosteroid and a local anesthetic, administered in a 1:1 volume ratio (1 ml + 1 ml, total volume 2 ml): 1. Corticosteroid: Betamethasone (administered as 1 ml of solution). 2. Local anesthetic: Mepivacaine (administered as 1 ml of solution). In the Ultrasound-Guided Infiltration group, 1 ml of betamethasone + 1 ml of mepivacaine are administered under real-time ultrasound guidance to ensure precise deposition in the target anatomical structure (subacromial space or carpal tunnel).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 years or older presenting in primary care. Clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome (shoulder pain from tendon compression) or carpal tunnel syndrome (wrist nerve compression). Moderate to severe pain intensity, defined as a score of greater than or equal to 3 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS \>= 3) at baseline. Patient must understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous corticosteroid infiltration in the target joint/structure within the last 6 months. History of major trauma, active infection, or previous surgery in the affected shoulder or wrist. Underlying systemic inflammatory diseases (for example, rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica). Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to corticosteroids (Betamethasone) or local anesthetics (Mepivacaine). Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Red flags suggesting tumor, fracture, or severe neurological deficit.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Institut Català de la Salutcollaborator
- Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurinalead
- Diputació de Lleidacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Atención Primaria (IDIAP Jordi Gol)
Lleida, Lleida, 25100, Spain
Related Publications (21)
Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, Keefe FJ, Mogil JS, Ringkamp M, Sluka KA, Song XJ, Stevens B, Sullivan MD, Tutelman PR, Ushida T, Vader K. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.
PMID: 32694387BACKGROUNDJolly M, Curran JJ. Underuse of intra-articular and periarticular corticosteroid injections by primary care physicians: discomfort with the technique. J Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Jun;9(3):187-92. doi: 10.1097/01.RHU.0000073587.90836.23.
PMID: 17041456BACKGROUNDLopez-Marina V, Pizarro-Romero G, Costa-Bardaji N, Mata-Navarro A, Vazquez-Blanco JR. [Evaluation of infiltrations performed in primary care]. Aten Primaria. 2005 Dec;36(10):544-9. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(05)70564-3. Spanish.
PMID: 16507288BACKGROUNDSoh E, Li W, Ong KO, Chen W, Bautista D. Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 25;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-137.
PMID: 21702969BACKGROUNDKorbe S, Udoji EN, Ness TJ, Udoji MA. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for chronic pain management. Pain Manag. 2015;5(6):465-82. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.46. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
PMID: 26402316BACKGROUNDCunnington J, Marshall N, Hide G, Bracewell C, Isaacs J, Platt P, Kane D. A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the joint of patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jul;62(7):1862-9. doi: 10.1002/art.27448.
PMID: 20222114BACKGROUNDTeunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, Ring D. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1913-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.001.
PMID: 25441568BACKGROUNDChesterton LS, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Burton C, Dziedzic KS, Davenport G, Jowett SM, Myers HL, Oppong R, Rathod-Mistry T, van der Windt DA, Hay EM, Roddy E. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of corticosteroid injection versus night splints for carpal tunnel syndrome (INSTINCTS trial): an open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Oct 20;392(10156):1423-1433. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31572-1.
PMID: 30343858BACKGROUNDZufferey P, Revaz S, Degailler X, Balague F, So A. A controlled trial of the benefits of ultrasound-guided steroid injection for shoulder pain. Joint Bone Spine. 2012 Mar;79(2):166-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 21612965BACKGROUNDStewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D. Lost productive work time costs from health conditions in the United States: results from the American Productivity Audit. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Dec;45(12):1234-46. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000099999.27348.78.
PMID: 14665809BACKGROUNDReid KJ, Harker J, Bala MM, Truyers C, Kellen E, Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J. Epidemiology of chronic non-cancer pain in Europe: narrative review of prevalence, pain treatments and pain impact. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Feb;27(2):449-62. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.545813. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
PMID: 21194394BACKGROUNDGarnaes KK, Morkved S, Salvesen O, Tonne T, Furan L, Gronhaug G, Vasseljen O, Johannessen HH. What factors are associated with health-related quality of life among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain? A cross-sectional study in primary health care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 22;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03914-x.
PMID: 33482782BACKGROUNDUrwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, Brammah T, Busby H, Roxby M, Simmons A, Williams G. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: the comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Nov;57(11):649-55. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.11.649.
PMID: 9924205BACKGROUNDLuime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/03009740310004667.
PMID: 15163107BACKGROUNDFranzblau A, Werner RA. What is carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):186-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.2.186. No abstract available.
PMID: 10411203BACKGROUNDWitten A, Barfod KW, Thorborg K, Foverskov M, Clausen MB. [Subacromial impingement syndrome]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2019 Apr 1;181(14):V03180215. Danish.
PMID: 30950368BACKGROUNDRoel-Valdes J, Arizo-Luque V, Ronda-Perez E. [Epidemiology of occupationally-caused carpal tunnel syndrome in the province of Alicante, Spain 1996-2004]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2006 Jul-Aug;80(4):395-409. doi: 10.1590/s1135-57272006000400009. Spanish.
PMID: 16913614BACKGROUNDBurger M, Africa C, Droomer K, Norman A, Pheiffe C, Gericke A, Samsodien A, Miszewski N. Effect of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy on pain, shoulder range of motion and shoulder function in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. S Afr J Physiother. 2016 Sep 27;72(1):318. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v72i1.318. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 30135893BACKGROUNDSilverstein BA, Viikari-Juntura E, Fan ZJ, Bonauto DK, Bao S, Smith C. Natural course of nontraumatic rotator cuff tendinitis and shoulder symptoms in a working population. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Apr;32(2):99-108. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.985.
PMID: 16680380BACKGROUNDGenova A, Dix O, Saefan A, Thakur M, Hassan A. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2020 Mar 19;12(3):e7333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7333.
PMID: 32313774BACKGROUNDKarcz WM, Artigues-Barbera E, Ortega Bravo M, Pooler Perea A, Palacin Peruga JM, Gimeno Pi I. Assessment of Pain Treatments in Disorders of Upper Limbs: A Qualitative Study Protocol Based on Patients' Experiences. Nurs Rep. 2023 May 22;13(2):803-810. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13020070.
PMID: 37218951RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marta Ortega Bravo, MD, PhD
Institut Català de la Salut. Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Atención Primaria (IDIAP Jordi Gol)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the interventions (ultrasound-guided infiltration versus conventional infiltration guided by anatomical landmarks versus oral pharmacological treatment), it is impossible to blind the family physicians performing the procedures. However, a single-blind design is maintained for the participants (patients), who are unaware of the alternative pharmacological or procedural strategies assigned to other groups. To minimize bias, outcome assessments and data analysis will be performed by researchers or statistical evaluators independent of the clinical intervention and unaware of the treatment groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Care Physician and Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2026
First Posted
July 9, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be available beginning 12 months after publication of the main results in the scientific journal and will remain accessible for a period of 3 years.
- Access Criteria
- * Who: Qualified academic researchers with a methodologically sound proposal and approved institutional affiliation. * What: Anonymized individual participant data (IPDs) that support the primary results, along with the Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP). * How: Access requests must be formally submitted via email to the corresponding author. To obtain the data, the requester must obtain approval from their own Institutional Ethics Committee and sign a legally binding Data Access Agreement to ensure data confidentiality and guarantee that the data will only be used for the approved research purpose.
Anonymized individual participant data that support the results to be published in the future will be available to qualified researchers who reasonably request them for academic research purposes. Data sharing will be subject to a formal request to the corresponding author, approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, and the signing of a data access agreement.