Osteoporotic Fracture and Lidocaine Plaster 5% for Neuropathic Pain preventioN
FLYNN
Preventive Effect of 5% Lidocaine Plaster on the Development of Neuropathic Pain Following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Proof-of-concept, Controlled, Randomized Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures may lead to chronic pain with a neuropathic component, which is often underdiagnosed and undertreated in older adults. This proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether early application of a 5% lidocaine plaster can prevent the development of neuropathic pain following an osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either a daily 5% lidocaine plaster plus standard care or standard care alone for 2 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who develop neuropathic pain at 2 months, assessed using the PainDETECT questionnaire.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jul 2026
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
July 8, 2026
June 1, 2026
1.3 years
July 2, 2026
July 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Development of neuropathic pain at 2 months
Percentage of participants who develop neuropathic pain 2 months after enrollment, assessed using the PainDETECT questionnaire. This self-administered questionnaire evaluates pain quality, temporal pattern, and radiation to estimate the likelihood of neuropathic pain. The total score allows classification of pain as unlikely, possible, or likely neuropathic. Neuropathic pain is defined as a PainDETECT score ≥19.
Baseline - Day 0 and Visit 2 - Day 60
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Pain assessment using the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (DN4)
Baseline - Day 0 and Visit 2 - Day 60
Treatment compliance
Day 1 to Day 60
Adverse events
Day 1 to Day 60
Pain evaluation
Baseline - Day 0, Day 1 to Day 60, and Visit 2 - Day 60
Concomitant medications
Day 1 to Day 60
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
5% Lidocaine Plaster
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a 5% lidocaine plaster applied daily (12 hours on/12 hours off) for 2 months in addition to standard care.
Standard Care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants receive standard care without a 5% lidocaine plaster.
Interventions
A 5% lidocaine plaster applied once daily for 12 hours followed by 12 hours without the plaster for 2 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female participant aged 50 years or older.
- Diagnosis of osteoporosis established by the treating rheumatologist.
- Osteoporotic vertebral fracture diagnosed within the previous month.
- Pain intensity of ≥3 on a numerical rating scale at the fracture site.
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
- Affiliated with a French health insurance system.
You may not qualify if:
- Medical or surgical condition considered by the investigator to be incompatible with study participation.
- Known hypersensitivity to lidocaine, any excipient of the study treatment, or other amide-type local anesthetics.
- Current treatment with Class I antiarrhythmic agents (e.g., tocainide, mexiletine) or other local anesthetics.
- Inflamed or damaged skin at the intended application site (e.g., active herpes zoster lesions, dermatitis, or wounds).
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Women of childbearing potential not using an effective contraceptive method.
- Positive urine pregnancy test for women whose menopausal status cannot be confirmed.
- Participation in another clinical research study.
- Individuals under legal protection or deprived of liberty.
- Refusal to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marie-Eva PICKERING
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2026
First Posted
July 8, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06