Targeted Cervical Versus Integrated Trunk and Diaphragmatic Muscle Retraining for Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
INT-CMNP
Comparison of Targeted Cervical Versus Integrated Trunk and Diaphragmatic Muscle Retraining on Pain and Disability in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Persistent pain, functional disability, cervical motor control deficit, and abnormal posture are associated with chronic mechanical neck pain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an integrated physiotherapy program of cervical motor control training, lumbopelvic stabilization, diaphragmatic breathing exercises, and pressure biofeedback versus conventional cervical physiotherapy in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain through a randomized controlled trial. 40 eligible participants were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group. The two groups were all given supervised physiotherapy three times a week for 6 weeks plus a standardized home exercise program. The main aim was to investigate the efficacy of the interventions on pain intensity and neck related disability. Secondary outcomes were CROM, DCFE, head position, and patient perceived recovery. Outcome measures were conducted at both baseline and the end of the six-week intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2026
CompletedJuly 8, 2026
July 1, 2026
2 months
July 1, 2026
July 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Neck Disability
Neck-related disability will be assessed using the NDI. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be assessed using the NPRS. The NPRS is an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Lower scores indicate reduced pain intensity.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Cervical Range of Motion
Baseline and 6 weeks
Deep Cervical Flexor Endurance
Baseline and 6 weeks
Head Posture
Baseline and 6 weeks
Global Rating of Change
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Integrated Physiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were treated with a comprehensive physiotherapy intervention that included cervical motor control exercises with pressure biofeedback, lumbopelvic stabilization exercises, diaphragmatic breathing exercises, and additional physiotherapy interventions as clinically necessary. Three times per week for 6 weeks. In addition, a standardized home exercise program was performed during the intervention.
Conventional Physiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll participants underwent conventional cervical physio, which included cervical range of motion exercises, cervical isometric strengthening, upper trapezius and levator scapulae and pectoral muscles stretching, scapulothoracic strengthening, proprioceptive training, postural correction exercises and intermittent cervical traction as clinically indicated. Treatment was given three times a week for 6 weeks. A standardized home exercise program was also performed by the participants during the intervention period.
Interventions
Participants were given an integrated physiotherapy program which comprised motor control training for the cervical spine with pressure biofeedback, lumbopelvic stabilization exercises, diaphragmatic breathing exercises, and a standardized home exercise program. Three treatment sessions per week for six weeks were conducted under supervision.
Conventional cervical physiotherapy included cervical range-of-motion exercises, isometric strengthening, stretching, scapulothoracic strengthening, proprioceptive training, postural exercises, and a standardized home exercise program. Supervised treatment was provided three times per week for six weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age in the range 18-60 years.
- CNMP (lasting more than 3 months).
- NPRS score ≥ 3.
- Head Impact Test (HIT-6) score \< 50.
- Absence of clinical signs of cervical radiculopathy.
- Capacity to comprehend study procedures, follow directions for exercising and sign informed consent in writing.
- Diaphragmatic function impairment by the DNS diaphragm test with asymmetric or inadequate rib expansion laterally, high elevation of upper chest or shoulder girdle and diminished truncal stabilization during inhalation.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants were excluded if they had cervical radiculopathy, cervical myelopathy, previous cervical spine surgery, spinal fracture, inflammatory arthritis, malignancy, neurological disorders, pregnancy, or any other serious spinal pathology that would make it difficult for the participant to participate in the rehabilitation programme. People with cognitive deficits or any medical condition which hampered their safe involvement in the exercise programme were also excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thumbay Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Hospital
Ajman, Ajman Emirate, United Arab Emirates
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a single-blind randomized control trial. An independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation, conducted outcome assessments. Due to the type of intervention (exercises), participants and physiotherapists were not blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2026
First Posted
July 8, 2026
Study Start
May 2, 2026
Primary Completion
June 26, 2026
Study Completion
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07