DL Models Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error Based on Non-Cycloplegic Parameters in Myopic Adults
Efficacy of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error Based on Non-Cycloplegic Parameters in Adults With Myopia
1 other identifier
observational
2,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study presents a machine learning model that predicts cycloplegic refraction in adults with myopia using standard non-cycloplegic eye measurements, aiming to reduce the need for cycloplegic drops while still identifying patients who require them.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 25, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2026
July 9, 2026
July 1, 2026
3.1 years
June 21, 2026
July 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of predicted cycloplegic spherical equivalent
Accuracy of the machine learning model in predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent in the validation dataset, evaluated by mean absolute error, root mean square error, and coefficient of determination, expressed for spherical equivalent in diopters.
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Diagnostic performance for identifying patients requiring cycloplegic refraction
Day 0
Agreement between predicted and measured cycloplegic refraction
Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Group with spherical equivalent change ≥0.50 diopters after cycloplegic refraction
Adult myopes with a non-cycloplegic versus cycloplegic spherical equivalent difference of ≥0.50 diopters, for whom cycloplegic refraction is clinically warranted, received routine cycloplegic refraction with tropicamide; no other intervention was given.
Group with spherical equivalent change <0.50 diopters after cycloplegic refraction
Adult myopes with an absolute difference of less than 0.50 diopters between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic spherical equivalent, for whom non-cycloplegic refraction is considered sufficient, received routine cycloplegic refraction with tropicamide; no additional intervention was applied.
Interventions
The machine learning model was applied to each participant's non-cycloplegic parameters to predict cycloplegic spherical equivalent.
Eligibility Criteria
Each subject underwent a comprehensive preoperative examination, including cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractions, Pentacam, etc.
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 60 years, of either sex;
- Spherical equivalent between -0.50 diopters and -10.00 diopters, with myopia in one or both eyes, and with cylinder of 4.00 diopters or less;
- Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye;
- Clear cornea, no keratoconus, corneal scarring, or other pathologies; clear lens;
- Intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg or less, with no history of glaucoma;
- No history of ocular surgery, especially corneal refractive surgery or cataract surgery;
- Time interval between non-cycloplegic refraction and cycloplegic refraction of 7 days or less, with complete data.
You may not qualify if:
- Incomplete clinical data to support the diagnosis;
- Ocular conditions such as subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, or moderate-to-severe corneal haze or leukoma;
- Allergy or contraindication to cycloplegic agents;
- Refusal to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi 330000
Jiangxi, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate research fellow; Attending physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2026
First Posted
July 8, 2026
Study Start
October 3, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 25, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 25, 2026
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share