NCT07690553

Brief Summary

This study conducted a comparative analysis of subjective exercise experiences between an AI-based fitness companion and traditional human coaching among 98 university students participating in a standardized 20-minute functional circuit training session. Participants were evaluated across three psychological dimensions: Emotional Resonance (ER), Interactive Dynamics (InD), and Embodied Presence (EP). The results indicated that human coaching elicited significantly higher levels of Emotional Resonance, whereas AI-based companions demonstrated superior performance in Interactive Dynamics. No significant differences were observed in Embodied Presence, suggesting that contemporary AI systems can provide spatial immersion and body-awareness comparable to human coaches. These findings indicate that AI and human coaches offer distinct psychological strengths, suggesting that AI should be viewed as a complementary, scalable tool for exercise guidance rather than a direct replacement for human emotional support.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

July 1, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Emotional Resonance (ER)

    Emotional Resonance (ER) measures the extent to which participants perceive empathy, encouragement, and emotional companionship during their exercise session. This dimension evaluates the responsiveness of the coach or system to signs of participant exhaustion or form breakdown, as well as the perceived sincerity of the feedback provided, which helps to alleviate exercise-related boredom or anxiety. Theoretically, it is grounded in parasocial interaction and social presence theories, suggesting that users naturally attribute social characteristics to interactive entities, fulfilling fundamental psychological needs for relatedness and competence.

    The psychological questionnaire assessing Emotional Resonance was administered to participants immediately upon completion of the 20-minute functional circuit training session.

  • Interactive Dynamics (InD)

    Interactive Dynamics (InD) represents the responsiveness, bidirectional communication, and real-time adaptability of the interaction process between the participant and the coach or system. It evaluates the fluidity of the communication loop, including the speed of movement correction, the naturalness of the exchange, and the system's ability to dynamically adjust guidance based on real-time performance. This construct is derived from human-computer interaction (HCI) theories, emphasizing that a seamless, low-latency feedback loop is essential for maintaining motor-cognitive immersion and optimizing exercise strategies.

    The psychological questionnaire assessing Interactive Dynamics was administered to participants immediately upon completion of the 20-minute functional circuit training session.

  • Embodied Presence (EP)

    Embodied Presence (EP) reflects the degree to which a participant perceives an instructing agent as occupying the same physical or virtual space, facilitating bodily awareness and spatial immersion. This dimension emphasizes spatial perception, physical occupancy, and proprioceptive mapping, allowing participants to intuitively map external postural cues (such as joint angles or body alignment) onto their own internal body schema. It is grounded in cognitive psychology and spatial cognition frameworks, measuring how well the instruction facilitates an intuitive spatial-motor translation.

    The psychological questionnaire assessing Embodied Presence was administered to participants immediately upon completion of the 20-minute functional circuit training session.

Study Arms (2)

AI-Based Companion Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: AI-Based Companion

Human-Coached Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Human-Coached

Interventions

The intervention for the AI-Based Companion group involved interacting with the BodyPark ATOM system (BodyPark Inc., Hong Kong, China), a portable AI fitness companion device. This device is equipped with a $160\^{\\circ}$ ultra-wide camera and features real-time motion analysis capabilities. During the 20-minute functional circuit training session, the system served as the digital coaching interface, providing automated real-time recognition of the targeted movements, verbal encouragement, and posture corrections.

AI-Based Companion Group
Human-CoachedBEHAVIORAL

Participants in the Human-Coached Group were supervised and instructed by human coaches, which included several co-authors of the study. These researchers are professionals who hold national- or international-level certifications as sports coaches or referees, or who serve as professors in the field of physical education. Throughout the circuit training, they provided verbal assistance and guidance using instructional terminology and feedback that was structurally equivalent to the parameters of the AI protocol to ensure experimental consistency.

Human-Coached Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Body Composition: Participants needed to have a body fat percentage between 15% and 25% for males, and between 20% and 30% for females.
  • Physical Capability: Participants were required to be physically capable of performing the designated bodyweight fitness movements, which included squats, lunges, and planks.

You may not qualify if:

  • Physical Health: Individuals with musculoskeletal injuries or acute physical conditions that would prevent the safe performance of standard bodyweight exercises were excluded.
  • Psychological Status: Individuals with a history of severe discomfort or diagnosed anxiety related to one-on-one fitness coaching or digital monitoring were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wuhan Technical University

Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress, PsychologicalMental FatigueCognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorFatigueSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctoral Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2026

First Posted

July 8, 2026

Study Start

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion

July 1, 2026

Study Completion

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to share individual participant data to protect the privacy of the participants and ensure data security.

Locations