Oxytocin Bolus Versus Infusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section (INBOX-HR)
INBOX-HR
Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial of Oxytocin Bolus Versus Infusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
180
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial is to learn if Oxytocin is most effective at achieving adequate uterine tone (important for preventing postpartum hemorrhage) when administered as a bolus or an infusion in patients at high-risk for postpartum hemorrhage in elective cesarean sections. The main questions that will be answered are:
- 1.Is Oxytocin bolus more effective than Oxytocin infusion at achieving adequate uterine tone at 2 minutes after the baby is born and every minute thereafter?
- 2.Does Oxytocin bolus cause less maternal side effects than Oxytocin infusion?
- 3.Does Oxytocin bolus result in less blood loss than Oxytocin infusion in high risk for postpartum hemorrhage patients undergoing elective cesarean sections?
- 4.Be randomized to receive either Oxytocin bolus or Oxytocin infusion during their cesarean section but after the baby is born.
- 5.Be asked a question about their experience 2 hours after the surgery.
- 6.Allow the research team to collect information about how they are doing from their hospital medical records.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2026
Typical duration for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2029
August 3, 2026
June 1, 2026
2 years
June 24, 2026
July 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to uterine tone
Uterine tone will be assessed at 2 mins and then every minute thereafter until adequate uterine tone is attained but no more than 10 minutes maximum, by a blinded obstetrician. Uterine tone will be deemed adequate or inadequate by the blinded obstetrician. The time for the primary endpoint analysis is adequacy of uterine tone at 2 minutes after the baby is born/umbilical cord clamped.
2 minutes after umbilical cord clamp until 10 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Estimated intraoperative blood loss
From the start to end of surgery
Changes in heart rate (beats per minute)
During uterine cord clamp and every 2 minutes thereafter until 10 minutes
Changes in blood pressure (mmHg)
During uterine cord clamp and every 2 minutes thereafter until 10 minutes.
Total dose of phenylephrine administered intraoperatively
From the start to end of surgery
Participants with need for additional uterotonic agents
From oxytocin administration until end of surgery
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Oxytocin Bolus
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the bolus arm will receive a 3 IU oxytocin IV bolus over 15 seconds after delivery of the baby/uterine cord clamping and a maintenance infusion of 0.9% Saline will be started at 225ml/hr. If uterine tone is considered inadequate after an additional 3 minutes, a second bolus of 3 IU oxytocin is given IV over 15 seconds. If uterine tone is inadequate after an additional 3 minutes, a third bolus of 3 IU Oxytocin IV is given over 15 seconds. If after an additional 3 mins uterine tone is still inadequate, a second infusion consisting of oxytocin 3 IU/hr is started at 100ml/hrs and continued for a total of 4 hours, second line uterotonic agents (Methergine, Hemabate and/ or Cytotec) will be given, and the maintenance 0.9% Saline infusion will be changed to 450 ml/hr for a total of 1 hour, then changed to 38 ml/ hour for the following 3 hours. If uterine tone is considered adequate at 3, 6 or 9 minutes, a second infusion of oxytocin 3 IU/hr (100ml/hr) is started and maintained
Oxytocin Infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the infusion arm will receive a bolus of IV 0.9% Saline over 15 seconds after delivery of the baby/uterine cord clamping and a maintenance infusion of 18 IU/hr Oxytocin IV (225ml/hr). If uterine tone is considered inadequate after an additional 3 minutes, a second bolus of 0.9% Saline will be given IV over 15 seconds. If uterine tone is inadequate after an additional 3 minutes, a third bolus of 0.9% Saline will be given IV over 15 seconds. If after an additional 3 mins uterine tone is still inadequate, a second infusion of 0.9% Saline will be started at 100 ml/hr for 4 hours, second line uterotonic agents (Methergine, Hemabate and/or Cytotec) will be given, and the Oxytocin infusion will be changed to 36 IU/hour (450 ml/hr) for a total of 1 hour, and then changed to 38 ml/hr for the following 3 hours. If uterine tone is considered adequate at 3, 6 or 9 minutes, a second infusion of 0.9% Saline at 100 ml/hr will be started and maintained for 4 hours.
Interventions
On the day of surgery, patients will be randomized to receive either bolus or infusion administration of Oxytocin. On the day of the procedure, periprocedural data and patient satisfaction (single question) will be recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia or combined spinal anesthesia (CSE)
- Patients must be able to provide written informed consent in either English or Spanish
- Parturient classified as high risk for postpartum hemorrhage as defined by the adapted California Maternal Quality Care Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk Screen
You may not qualify if:
- Parturient in labor or ruptured membranes
- Patient does not possess the physical and mental capacity to provide informed consent
- Urgent or emergent cesarean sections
- Patients with a known major coagulopathy
- Patients with significant thrombocytopenia limiting neuraxial anesthesia (\<70k)
- Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation at time of procedure
- Patients on the placenta accreta spectrum
- Patients with severe cardiac disease contraindicating oxytocin
- Patients with an allergy to oxytocin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Wang LY, Wang J, Dong JH, Ping ZP, Chen XZ, Wei CN. The optimal oxytocin infusion rate for preventing uterine atony during cesarean delivery in elderly parturients with prior history of cesarean delivery. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1211693. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1211693. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37576820BACKGROUNDOyelese Y, Ananth CV. Postpartum hemorrhage: epidemiology, risk factors, and causes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;53(1):147-56. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181cc406d.
PMID: 20142652BACKGROUNDJoseph J, George SK, Daniel M, Ranjan RV. A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not? Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;64(11):960-964. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_377_20. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
PMID: 33487681BACKGROUNDFuchs AR, Fuchs F, Husslein P, Soloff MS. Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus during pregnancy and parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Nov 15;150(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90677-x.
PMID: 6093538BACKGROUNDTerblanche N, Otahal P, Messmer A, Wright P, Patel S, Nathan K, Sharman JE. An observational cohort study of 3 units versus 5 units slow intravenous bolus oxytocin in women undergoing elective caesarean delivery. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;68(4):547-553.
PMID: 29151071BACKGROUNDBalki M, Tsen L. Oxytocin protocols for cesarean delivery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Spring;52(2):48-66. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000016. No abstract available.
PMID: 24667448BACKGROUNDSay L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gulmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5.
PMID: 25103301BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tiffany E Angelo, DO, FASA
Stony Brook University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2026
First Posted
July 7, 2026
Study Start
August 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2029
Last Updated
August 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06