Alterations in Spiking Following Muscle Fatigue in Volleyball Players
Alterations in Spiking Kinematic, Muscle Activation, and Subacromial Structures Following Muscle Fatigue in Volleyball Players
1 other identifier
observational
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims (1)to investigate the effects of repetitive functional overhead movements targeting shoulder and scapular muscles on glenohumeral and scapular kinematics and muscle activation during the arm cocking and acceleration of spiking, and changes in subacromial structures in healthy recreational volleyball players; (2) to compare these fatigue-related changes between athletes with good and poor shoulder motor control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
July 7, 2026
November 1, 2025
6 months
December 17, 2025
July 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Degree of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joint during spiking
The kinematics is assessed using an electromagnetic motion tracking system (VIPERTM, Polhemus, USA) to measure the glenohumeral elevation, horizontal abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation, and scapulothoracic retraction/protraction, upward/downward rotation, anterior/posterior tilt during spiking movement. During the test, participants performed 3 times of cross-body spikes, with 15 seconds of rest between each trial. Data were collected at the end of the arm cocking (maximal shoulder horizontal abduction) and at ball-contact (maximal footswitch signal), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: degree, °)
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Activation amplitude of the glenohumeral and periscapular muscles
The muscle activation amplitude of the serratus anterior, upper trapezius, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, infraspinatus, and pectoralis major during spiking movement. During the test, participants performed 3 times of cross-body spikes, with 15 seconds of rest between each trial. Data were collected in the arm cocking phase (from minimal shoulder elevation to the shoulder maximal horizontal abduction) and the acceleration phase (from maximal shoulder horizontal abduction to the ball-contact), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: percentage, %)
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Mean power frequency of the glenohumeral and periscapular muscles
The mean power frequency of the serratus anterior, upper trapezius, lower trapezius, middle deltoid, infraspinatus, and pectoralis major during spiking movement. During the test, participants performed 3 times of cross-body spikes, with 15 seconds of rest between each trial. Data were collected in the arm cocking phase (from minimal shoulder elevation to the shoulder maximal horizontal abduction) and the acceleration phase (from maximal shoulder horizontal abduction to the ball-contact), and reported as mean values for each trial. (unit of measure: hertz, Hz)
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Acromio-humeral distance and thickness of supraspinatus tendon thickness during arm elevation
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Degree of shoulder elevation at greater tuberosity-acromion alignment during arm elevation
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (Day 1)
Study Arms (2)
Poor shoulder motor control
During shoulder medial rotation up to 60° in supine position, the scapula forward tilts or elevation occurs, difficulties in breathing, performing difficulties, unable to perform 60° medial rotation, glenohumeral anterior translation, fatigue, the need of external feedback and external support.
Good shoulder motor control
During shoulder medial rotation up to 60° in supine position, no scapula and glenohumeral compensation, easy to breathing and perform 60° medial rotation without external feedback and external support.
Interventions
The subject performed upper extremity D2 diagonal exercise with Thera-band at kneeling position to simulate the arm movement of a volleyball spike. The movement is paced by a metronome at one beat per second, with one movement per beat. If participants could not keep up or become too fatigued, they are allowed to rest for 15 seconds before continuing. The subject was defined as fatigued, and the fatigue activity was stopped, only when all three of the following cumulative conditions were met: 1. Until the number of repetitions in that set was less than 50% of the repetitions performed in the first set. 2. Using the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) on a 6-20 scale, until the subject's RPE was greater than or equal to 15. 3. If this maximum strength showed a decrease of 25% or more compared to the maximum strength measured before the fatigue activity.
Eligibility Criteria
Healthy recreational volleyball players
You may qualify if:
- Between 18 and 35 years old
- At least 2 consecutive years of volleyball experience
- Involved in volleyball practice or game for at least 4 hours per week
- Able to perform a cross-body spike with 3-step
You may not qualify if:
- A history of major shoulder or spinal injury or surgery
- Experiencing shoulder pain (VAS ≥ 3/10) in the last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Taipei, 112, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2025
First Posted
July 7, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-11