STSC-HybridAPC Trial
Snare Tip Soft Coagulation Versus Hybrid APC (ERBE) for Post-EMR Margin Thermal Ablation - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Margin thermal ablation after piecemeal EMR significantly reduces recurrence of large colorectal polyps. As recurrence rates are now low, the key implementation question relates to efficiency and reproducibility of different ablation techniques. This randomized controlled trial compares snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) with Hybrid APC (ERBE), with procedural time as the primary endpoint.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2027
July 6, 2026
June 1, 2026
7 months
June 26, 2026
June 26, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Net margin ablation time
Net margin ablation time (seconds), defined as the elapsed time from the first application of thermal energy to the resection margin (first activation in soft coagulation mode) until the operator declares completion of circumferential margin ablation. Time will be recorded using a standardized stopwatch method by a trained assistant/nurse (or captured from time-stamped video, if available). Interruptions unrelated to margin ablation (e.g., equipment troubleshooting) will be documented and excluded from net time where feasible, with sensitivity analyses planned.
during the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Time (total)
during procedure
Technical success of margin ablation
during procedure
Instrument exchanges (count)
during procedure
Need for additional haemostatic therapy (yes/no)
during procedure
Operator-rated ease of use (VAS 0-10)
during procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCircumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode. The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Hybrid APC (ERBE)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCircumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode. The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment. Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).
Interventions
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using the distal tip of a standard polypectomy snare in soft coagulation mode. The tip will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment.
Circumferential thermal ablation of the resection margin will be performed using Hybrid APC (ERBE) in standard APC mode. The argon plasma beam will be applied sequentially to the entire visible mucosal defect margin to achieve complete circumferential treatment. Electrosurgical settings will be standardized according to unit protocol (effect and wattage predefined for Hybrid APC use).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Undergoing piecemeal EMR of a non-pedunculated colorectal lesion ≥20 mm in size
- Macroscopically complete resection achieved prior to margin ablation (no visible residual adenomatous tissue at the resection base)
- Ability to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Lesions requiring en bloc resection by ESD
- Lesions with suspected deep submucosal invasion based on endoscopic assessment (e.g., depressed morphology, non-lifting sign, NICE type 3 pattern, or equivalent advanced imaging criteria)
- Inflammatory bowel disease with active colitis at the lesion site
- Overt invasive carcinoma requiring surgical management
- Pregnancy
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Westmead Hospital
Sydney, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Related Publications (3)
Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libanio D, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellise M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albeniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
PMID: 38670139BACKGROUNDGauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.
PMID: 40044497BACKGROUNDBelderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):388-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1364970. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
PMID: 24671869BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael J Bourke, MBBS
WSLHD
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Michael Bourke
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2026
First Posted
July 6, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 15, 2027
Last Updated
July 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share