Smart Analysis and Decision-Making for Emerging Infectious Diseases
SMART-ID
AI-enabled Emergency Clinical Research for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases: Protocol for an International Consensus
1 other identifier
interventional
780
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Emerging infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, mpox, and dengue fever, are characterized by rapid transmission, wide impact, and high uncertainty, posing ongoing threats to global public health. While China achieved significant success in COVID-19 control, the response also revealed key challenges, including fragmented information, delayed risk perception, experience-dependent assessment, and inefficiencies in complex decision-making. This study aims to establish a smart technology system covering the full chain of "risk perception-situational assessment-intelligent decision-making-comprehensive evaluation." Specific objectives include: Constructing a global disease burden database and knowledge graph for emerging infectious diseases; Developing early risk assessment models covering the full transmission spectrum (cross-species, imported, and local outbreak); Building an AI-driven collective intelligence decision-support tool for epidemic control; Developing precise intervention frameworks and comprehensive evaluation indicators for key populations (e.g., elderly, students); Integrating the above technologies into a multi-agent toolkit and evaluating its effectiveness through a cluster randomized controlled trial across 52 CDC sites in five provinces (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Hubei, Sichuan, and Shanghai). The study population includes public health professionals and managers responsible for epidemic surveillance, risk assessment, decision-making, and emergency response at the city/district/county CDC levels across the five provinces. Approximately 780 participants will be enrolled. The intervention group will use the smart toolkit alongside routine practices, while the control group will follow routine practices only. The primary outcome is response time for epidemic assessment and decision-making (hours from risk perception to decision completion). Secondary outcomes include epidemic control effectiveness, user satisfaction, and socioeconomic benefits. The intervention period is 3 months, starting around July 2026 and ending in December 2027. This study has been approved by the Peking University Biomedical Ethics Committee. The study does not involve individual patient data; all data are aggregated at the district/county level from CDC sources or publicly available data. Anonymous questionnaires do not collect any personal identifiable information.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2027
July 1, 2026
June 1, 2026
1 year
June 24, 2026
June 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response Time for Risk Assessment Report Generation and Submission
Response time consists of two components measured in hours: (1) Report generation time - time from the diagnosis of the index case in a cluster outbreak to the system's automatic generation of the first risk assessment report and decision-support recommendations; and (2) Report submission time - time from report generation to its official submission. Measured via electronic questionnaire and CDC reporting logs.
Measured at baseline (enrollment) and at the end of the 3-month intervention period
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Consistency of Risk Assessment Results between Multi-Agent Toolkit and Expert Panel
Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period
Epidemic Control Effectiveness
Assessed continuously throughout the 3-month intervention period and summarized at the end of the intervention
User Experience and Satisfaction with the Smart Toolkit
Measured at the end of the 3-month intervention period
Healthcare Resource Consumption
Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period
Prevention and Control Resource Inputs
Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive the multi-agent integrated smart toolkit, consisting of Data-Knowledge, Assessment, Decision, and Evaluation agents, in addition to routine infectious disease prevention and control practices. The toolkit is designed to assist CDC staff with epidemic risk perception, situational assessment, and emergency decision-making throughout the 3-month intervention period, alongside their routine CDC workflow.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will follow routine infectious disease prevention and control practices only, without access to the multi-agent integrated smart toolkit, including standard epidemic surveillance, information collection, risk assessment, and emergency response procedures currently implemented at their respective CDC, and will continue their regular workflow without any additional intervention during the 3-month study period.
Interventions
The multi-agent integrated smart toolkit consists of four integrated agents: (1) Data-Knowledge Agent - for early risk perception based on historical event experience; (2) Assessment Agent - for risk assessment and situational analysis; (3) Decision Agent - for emergency decision support; and (4) Evaluation Agent - for effect simulation and comprehensive evaluation. The toolkit is designed to assist CDC staff with epidemic risk perception, situational assessment, and emergency decision-making. It is used alongside routine infectious disease prevention and control practices.
Routine infectious disease prevention and control practices currently implemented at the CDC, including standard epidemic surveillance, information collection, risk assessment, and emergency response procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Working at a district/county/city-level CDC in one of the five participating provinces/municipalities (Zhejiang, Guangdong, Hubei, Sichuan, or Shanghai) where at least one emerging infectious disease (COVID-19, mpox, influenza, dengue, chikungunya, or avian influenza) has occurred.
- Currently responsible for or involved in infectious disease epidemic prevention and control work, including information collection, risk perception, risk assessment, decision-making, risk management, and emergency response at the CDC.
- Willing to voluntarily participate in this study and provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18 years of age.
- Diagnosed with severe mental illness or other conditions that impede normal communication.
- Employed in the current CDC position for less than 1 year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jue Liu
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jue Liu, Doctor
Peking University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2026
First Posted
July 1, 2026
Study Start
July 17, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 17, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Last Updated
July 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06