Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching Method in Nursing Process Education
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 1, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 months
June 23, 2026
June 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
The quality of nursing care plans will be evaluated using the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The Q-DIO is a 29-item instrument designed to assess the quality of nursing documentation, including nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. The instrument consists of four domains: Nursing Diagnoses as Process, Nursing Diagnoses as Outcomes, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes. Higher scores indicate higher quality and more comprehensive documentation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patient outcomes in nursing care plans.
After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form
At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey
At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALNursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and participated in Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching activities based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORNursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and prepared group nursing care plans based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice.
Interventions
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The experimental group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to prepare a presentation using the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. One student from each group delivered the presentation on behalf of the group. Feedback sessions were conducted following the presentations. Subsequently, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The control group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to collaboratively prepare a nursing care plan based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. Following this activity, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-year nursing students
- Successfully completed prerequisite nursing courses
- Grade point average (GPA) of 1.80 or higher
- Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
- Providing written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Students repeating the course
- Graduates of Vocational School of Health Services programs
- Withdrawal from the study at any stage
- Failure to complete study assessments or data collection forms
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
Istanbul, Avcılar, 34310, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Funda Büyükyılmaz, Professor
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Graduate Student, Department of Fundamentals of Nursing
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2026
First Posted
July 1, 2026
Study Start
April 9, 2026
Primary Completion
June 30, 2026
Study Completion
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
July 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves educational data collected from nursing students, and participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected in accordance with ethical approval and institutional regulations.