Access Sheaths With Aspiration for Renal RetrOgrade Surgery, Randomized CompArative Outcomes
ARROCA01
ACCESS SHEATHS WITH ASPIRATION FOR RETROGRADE RENAL SURGERY, RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES
2 other identifiers
interventional
156
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath (Coloplast) is more effective than the Navigator ureteral access sheath (Boston Scientific) in treating intrarenal kidney stones of 1-3 cm in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ClearPetra achieve a higher stone-free rate at 1 month post-intervention compared to Navigator, as assessed by non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan? Does ClearPetra reduce total surgical time compared to Navigator? Does ClearPetra lower the retreatment rate at 3 months compared to Navigator? Does ClearPetra present a rate of clinically significant complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) that is lower than or similar to Navigator? Researchers will compare flexible ureteroscopy using the ClearPetra vacuum-assisted flexible ureteral access sheath to flexible ureteroscopy using the Navigator standard rigid ureteral access sheath, to see if ClearPetra leads to higher stone clearance rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Participants will: Undergo flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) using one of two randomly assigned ureteral access sheaths (ClearPetra or Navigator), determined by computer-generated randomization immediately before surgery Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 1 month post-intervention to assess stone-free status Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 3 months post-intervention to evaluate residual fragments and the need for retreatment Attend follow-up visits at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery for clinical assessment and complication recording The study will be conducted at the Urology Department of Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), a tertiary reference centre. A total of 156 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (78 per group), with pre-defined subgroup analyses stratified by stone size (1-2 cm vs. \>2 cm). The outcome assessor evaluating CT images for stone-free rate will be blinded to treatment allocation (single-blind).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2030
July 1, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 years
June 25, 2026
June 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Stone-Free Rate (SFR) at 1 Month Post-Intervention
Proportion of patients with complete absence of residual lithiasis or presence exclusively of fragments ≤2 mm on non-contrast abdomino-pelvic CT scan performed at 30 ±7 days post-intervention. Assessed by a blinded outcomes assessor using standardised multiplanar CT reconstruction. Dichotomous variable: stone-free (yes/no). A sensitivity analysis will apply a stricter definition (0 mm, complete absence of any fragment).
30 days (±7 days) after surgical intervention
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Stone-Free Rate (SFR) at 3 Months Post-Intervention
90 days (±14 days) after surgical intervention
Stone Volume Reduction Rate at 1 Month
30 days (±7 days) after surgical intervention
Immediate Endoscopic Stone-Free Rate
Intraoperative (at procedure completion, Day 0)
Immediate Fluoroscopic Stone-Free Rate
Intraoperative (at procedure completion, Day 0)
Retreatment Rate at 3 Months
Up to 90 days (±14 days) after surgical intervention
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Subgroup Analysis of SFR at 1 Month by Stone Size
30 days (±7 days) after surgical intervention
Study Arms (2)
ClearPetra Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath
EXPERIMENTALFlexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) for intrarenal lithiasis (1-3 cm) using the ClearPetra® ureteral access sheath (Coloplast) - a tip-flexible sheath with integrated continuous vacuum aspiration system for active removal of stone fragments and irrigation fluid throughout the procedure. Laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG or Thulium) is applied for stone fragmentation. Accessory instruments (retrieval basket, stone cone) are used per standardised protocol. Follow-up includes non-contrast CT at 1 and 3 months post-intervention.
Navigator® Standard Rigid Ureteral Access Sheath
ACTIVE COMPARATORFlexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) for intrarenal lithiasis (1-3 cm) using the Navigator® ureteral access sheath (Boston Scientific) - a standard rigid sheath without active aspiration. Laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG or Thulium) is applied for stone fragmentation. Accessory instruments (retrieval basket, stone cone) are used per standardised protocol. Follow-up includes non-contrast CT at 1 and 3 months post-intervention
Interventions
Tip-flexible ureteral access sheath with integrated continuous vacuum aspiration system (Coloplast). Placed transurethrally prior to flexible ureteroscopy to maintain stable ureteral access and actively evacuate stone fragments and irrigation fluid throughout the RIRS procedure. Used in combination with laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG or Thulium) for fragmentation of intrarenal stones of 1-3 cm. Accessory instruments (retrieval basket, stone cone) employed per standardised intraoperative protocol.
Standard rigid ureteral access sheath without active aspiration mechanism (Boston Scientific). Placed transurethrally prior to flexible ureteroscopy to maintain stable ureteral access during the RIRS procedure. Used in combination with laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG or Thulium) for fragmentation of intrarenal stones of 1-3 cm. Accessory instruments (retrieval basket, stone cone) employed per standardised intraoperative protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Diagnosis of intrarenal lithiasis with maximum stone diameter of 1-3 cm on preoperative non-contrast abdomino-pelvic CT scan
- Candidate for treatment by flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) as indicated by the treating urologist
- Attended at the Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain)
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
- Able to comply with the study follow-up schedule (CT scan at 1 and 3 months post-intervention)
You may not qualify if:
- Active urinary tract infection or urosepsis at the time of the planned intervention
- Known ureteral stricture precluding passage of a ureteral access sheath
- Pregnancy
- Prior urinary diversion incompatible with transurethral access (e.g., urinary conduit, neobladder)
- Bleeding disorder or anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy that cannot be safely interrupted perioperatively
- Stone diameter \<1 cm or \>3 cm on preoperative CT
- Inability to provide informed consent (cognitive impairment, language barrier without interpreter availability)
- Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial that could interfere with the outcomes of this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virgen del Rocio University Hospital
Seville, Seville, 41013, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Danilovic A, Cavalanti A, Rocha BA, Traxer O, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M. Assessment of Residual Stone Fragments After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol. 2018 Dec;32(12):1108-1113. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0529.
PMID: 30398369BACKGROUNDCui D, Ma Q, Xie S, Wang G, Li G, Chen G. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for </= 2 cm renal stones. Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 27;14(1):4745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55333-w.
PMID: 38413652BACKGROUNDBerquet G, Prunel P, Verhoest G, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones. World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):229-32. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1181-5. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
PMID: 24166287BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paula Rodríguez-Marcos, MD
Department of Urology. Unit of Urolithiasis. Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rafael A Medina-López, PhD
Department of Urology. Unit of Uro-Oncology. Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2026
First Posted
July 1, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2030
Last Updated
July 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- IPD and supporting information will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results article and will remain available for a minimum of 5 years following initial data availability. Requests submitted after this period will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
- Access Criteria
- Access to IPD will be granted to researchers who provide a methodologically sound research proposal, approved by their institutional review board where applicable. Requests must be submitted to the principal investigator (Dr. Enrique Argüelles Salido, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain) via institutional email. Data will be transferred via a secure, password-protected platform under a signed data sharing agreement. Data will not be used for commercial purposes.
Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the primary publication will be shared, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices). This includes data for the primary outcome (stone-free rate at 1 month) and all pre-specified secondary outcomes. Data will be shared upon reasonable request to the principal investigator, subject to a data sharing agreement ensuring compliance with GDPR (EU Regulation 2016/679) and Spanish Law 3/2018 on Personal Data Protection.