This Study Compares the Conventional Cutting Seton Technique and a GLUBRAN®-Coated Seton in High Perianal Fistula Treatment. The Study Aims to Determine Whether the GLUBRAN®-Coated Seton Improves Healing, Reduces Postoperative Pain and Recurrence, and Better Preserves Anal Continence.
Comparative Study Between Regular Seton and GLUBRAN® Coated Seton in the Management of High Anal Fistula (Novel Technique)
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High anal fistula is a complex anorectal condition that can cause persistent pain, purulent discharge, recurrent infection, and a significant reduction in quality of life. The conventional cutting seton technique is an established treatment modality; however, it may be associated with postoperative pain, delayed healing, recurrence, and impairment of anal continence. GLUBRAN® is a synthetic surgical adhesive with antimicrobial and tissue-healing properties that may enhance the performance of the cutting seton and improve clinical outcomes. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a conventional cutting seton with a GLUBRAN®-coated cutting seton in adult patients with high anal fistulas. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups and followed for six months after surgery. The primary and secondary outcome measures will include fistula healing rate, time to complete healing, postoperative pain, anal continence, recurrence, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. The findings of this study may provide evidence regarding whether coating a cutting seton with GLUBRAN® offers clinical advantages over the conventional technique, potentially leading to improved healing, reduced postoperative morbidity, and better preservation of anal continence in the management of high anal fistulas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 11, 2026
CompletedJune 30, 2026
June 1, 2026
6 months
June 23, 2026
June 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Continence
Assessment of continence status using a validated scoring system (e.g., Wexner Incontinence Score) to compare the impact of both techniques on sphincter function. (0 - 20) 0 being no incontinence, and 20 being no continence.
6 months
Healing Rate
To compare the complete healing rate and time of complete healing after treatment using either Seton placement or GLUBRAN®-coated Seton over a standardized follow-up period of 6 months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Hospital Stay Duration
2 days
Incidence of complications such as infection, abscess formation, bleeding.
6 months
Recurrence
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Glubran-coated Seton
EXPERIMENTALUsing Glubran combined with Seton in the managment of high/complex perianal fistula
Seton
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsing regular Seton that is already established in the management of high/complex perianal fistula
Interventions
Using 2 ampules of no. 1 Vicryl suture as a Seton combined with Glubran 2 in the management of high/complex perianal fistula
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patients fit for surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, malignancy, or radiation-associated fistulas (due to different healing patterns and management protocols).
- Presence of acute perianal abscess at the time of surgery
- Patients with uncontrolled comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders, immunosuppression) that could affect healing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kasr Al Ainy Hospital
Giza, Giza Governorate, 11562, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Barillari P, Basso L, Larcinese A, Gozzo P, Indinnimeo M. Cyanoacrylate glue in the treatment of ano-rectal fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Dec;21(8):791-4. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0090-0. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
PMID: 16625375BACKGROUND8. Koli D, Kumar P, Panda V. "Evaluation of the role of cyanoacrylate glue in the management of fistula-in-ano." International Surgery Journal. 2020;7(9):3349-3353.
BACKGROUNDGarcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):243-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.02877.x.
PMID: 9501826BACKGROUNDParks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976 Jan;63(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630102.
PMID: 1267867BACKGROUNDShirah BH, Shirah HA. The Impact of the Outcome of Treating a High Anal Fistula by Using a Cutting Seton and Staged Fistulotomy on Saudi Arabian Patients. Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Oct;34(5):234-240. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.03.23. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
PMID: 30304930BACKGROUND1. Treatment of fistula-in-ano with tight (cutting) seton: analysis of outcomes and efficacy assessment. Al-Marzooq TJM, Hassan QA, Alnaser MKH, Al-edani MS. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:5-8
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ismail A Shafik, M.D.
Kasr El Aini Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Abdelrahman M. Ibrahim, M.D.
Kasr El Aini Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Y. Ahmed, M.D.
Kasr El Aini Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- General Surgery Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2026
First Posted
June 30, 2026
Study Start
January 11, 2026
Primary Completion
July 11, 2026
Study Completion
July 11, 2026
Last Updated
June 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality considerations, the sensitive nature of clinical surgical data, and institutional data protection policies. Only aggregated results will be reported.