NCT07676825

Brief Summary

High anal fistula is a complex anorectal condition that can cause persistent pain, purulent discharge, recurrent infection, and a significant reduction in quality of life. The conventional cutting seton technique is an established treatment modality; however, it may be associated with postoperative pain, delayed healing, recurrence, and impairment of anal continence. GLUBRAN® is a synthetic surgical adhesive with antimicrobial and tissue-healing properties that may enhance the performance of the cutting seton and improve clinical outcomes. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a conventional cutting seton with a GLUBRAN®-coated cutting seton in adult patients with high anal fistulas. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups and followed for six months after surgery. The primary and secondary outcome measures will include fistula healing rate, time to complete healing, postoperative pain, anal continence, recurrence, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. The findings of this study may provide evidence regarding whether coating a cutting seton with GLUBRAN® offers clinical advantages over the conventional technique, potentially leading to improved healing, reduced postoperative morbidity, and better preservation of anal continence in the management of high anal fistulas.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2026

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 11, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 11, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 30, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

June 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

FistulaHigh FistulaComplex FistulaSetonGlubran

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Continence

    Assessment of continence status using a validated scoring system (e.g., Wexner Incontinence Score) to compare the impact of both techniques on sphincter function. (0 - 20) 0 being no incontinence, and 20 being no continence.

    6 months

  • Healing Rate

    To compare the complete healing rate and time of complete healing after treatment using either Seton placement or GLUBRAN®-coated Seton over a standardized follow-up period of 6 months

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Hospital Stay Duration

    2 days

  • Incidence of complications such as infection, abscess formation, bleeding.

    6 months

  • Recurrence

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Glubran-coated Seton

EXPERIMENTAL

Using Glubran combined with Seton in the managment of high/complex perianal fistula

Procedure: Glubran-coated Seton

Seton

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Using regular Seton that is already established in the management of high/complex perianal fistula

Procedure: Seton

Interventions

Using 2 ampules of no. 1 Vicryl suture as a Seton combined with Glubran 2 in the management of high/complex perianal fistula

Glubran-coated Seton
SetonPROCEDURE

Using 2 ampules of no. 1 Vicryl as a regular Seton

Seton

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patients fit for surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, malignancy, or radiation-associated fistulas (due to different healing patterns and management protocols).
  • Presence of acute perianal abscess at the time of surgery
  • Patients with uncontrolled comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorders, immunosuppression) that could affect healing.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kasr Al Ainy Hospital

Giza, Giza Governorate, 11562, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Barillari P, Basso L, Larcinese A, Gozzo P, Indinnimeo M. Cyanoacrylate glue in the treatment of ano-rectal fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Dec;21(8):791-4. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0090-0. Epub 2006 Apr 20.

    PMID: 16625375BACKGROUND
  • 8. Koli D, Kumar P, Panda V. "Evaluation of the role of cyanoacrylate glue in the management of fistula-in-ano." International Surgery Journal. 2020;7(9):3349-3353.

    BACKGROUND
  • Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):243-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.02877.x.

    PMID: 9501826BACKGROUND
  • Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976 Jan;63(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630102.

    PMID: 1267867BACKGROUND
  • Shirah BH, Shirah HA. The Impact of the Outcome of Treating a High Anal Fistula by Using a Cutting Seton and Staged Fistulotomy on Saudi Arabian Patients. Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Oct;34(5):234-240. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.03.23. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

    PMID: 30304930BACKGROUND
  • 1. Treatment of fistula-in-ano with tight (cutting) seton: analysis of outcomes and efficacy assessment. Al-Marzooq TJM, Hassan QA, Alnaser MKH, Al-edani MS. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:5-8

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fistula

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ismail A Shafik, M.D.

    Kasr El Aini Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Abdelrahman M. Ibrahim, M.D.

    Kasr El Aini Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ahmed Y. Ahmed, M.D.

    Kasr El Aini Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: articipants diagnosed with high anal fistula and meeting the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel study groups. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random allocation sequence with concealed allocation. Group A (Control Group) will undergo conventional cutting seton placement using a silk seton. Group B (Intervention Group) will undergo cutting seton placement using a silk seton coated with GLUBRAN® surgical adhesive prior to insertion. All surgical procedures will be performed according to standardized operative techniques, and all participants will receive the same postoperative care and follow-up schedule. Participants will be evaluated during the postoperative period and at regular follow-up visits to assess healing, continence, pain, recurrence, and complications. The primary outcomes include complete healing rate, time to complete healing, and continence preservation as assessed by the Wexner Continence Score
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
General Surgery Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2026

First Posted

June 30, 2026

Study Start

January 11, 2026

Primary Completion

July 11, 2026

Study Completion

July 11, 2026

Last Updated

June 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared publicly due to patient confidentiality considerations, the sensitive nature of clinical surgical data, and institutional data protection policies. Only aggregated results will be reported.

Available IPD Datasets

Individual Participant Data Set Access
Study Protocol Access

Locations