ORASIS in Breast Reconstruction
ORASIS and Microsurgical Anastomosis Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the use of ORASIS during microsurgical anastomosis formation in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction and its potential effects on surgical precision, surgeon efficiency, and anastomosis outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that the use of ORASIS will decrease the amount of time needed to perform microsurgical anastomoses, reduce interruptions for irrigation and suction, and increase the quality of anastomoses in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2026
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
July 1, 2026
June 1, 2026
1 year
June 22, 2026
June 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mean anastomosis time (minutes)
Total anastomosis time will be defined as the number of minutes from first suture placement to anastomosis completion.
From first suture placement to anastomosis completion
Mean ischemia time (minutes)
Total ischemia time will be defined as the number of minutes from flap division to flap reperfusion.
From pedicle transection to anastomosis completion
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean number of interruptions per procedure
From beginning of microsurgical anastomosis to end of microsurgical anastomosis
Mean NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) score
From beginning of microsurgical anastomosis to end of microsurgical anastomosis
Mean Surgical Assessment Metric Scale (SAMS) overall scores
From beginning of microsurgical anastomosis to end of microsurgical anastomosis
Surgeon Survey
Within 1 month after conclusion of DIEP flap surgery procedure
Incidence of postoperative complications 0-48 hours after procedure
Within 48 hours after DIEP flap surgery
Other Outcomes (2)
Estimated cost difference per case (economic impact metrics)
During the entirety of the DIEP flap procedure
Number of surgeons per case
During the entirety of the DIEP flap procedure
Study Arms (2)
Control Arm
NO INTERVENTIONIn the control arm, surgeons will perform two microsurgical anastomoses without the use of ORASIS in either bilateral or unilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. If bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction is performed in the control arm, only the first microsurgical anastomosis for each bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction will be assessed. In both study arms, surgeons will perform end-to-end anastomosis using current standard-of-care techniques. This will include the formation of anastomoses between the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) perforators and internal mammary artery (IMA) in the antegrade direction of blood flow using 8-0 nylon sutures, as well as the deep inferior epigastric vein (DIEV) perforators and internal mammary vein (IMV).
ORASIS Arm
EXPERIMENTALIn the ORASIS arm, surgeons will perform two microsurgical anastomoses with the use of ORASIS in either bilateral or unilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. If bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction is performed in the treatment arm, ORASIS will only be used in the first microsurgical anastomosis performed in each bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction; only the breast reconstructed with the use of ORASIS will be assessed. In both study arms, surgeons will perform end-to-end anastomosis using current standard-of-care techniques. This will include the formation of anastomoses between the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and internal mammary artery (IMA) in the antegrade direction of blood flow using 8-0 nylon sutures, as well as the deep inferior epigastric vein (DIEV) perforators and internal mammary vein (IMV).
Interventions
The study intervention is the use of the ORASIS device during Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. ORASIS is a dual irrigation and suction device that can be placed in the surgical field during the formation of microsurgical anastomoses. The device was previously registered with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under registration number 878.4200; the device is currently not registered with the FDA as it is pending renewal. The device is manufactured by a partner company (Spectroplast/Ricoh UK) with compliance to international quality standards. The manufacturer has successfully implemented the ISO 9001 Quality Management System across operational areas following a comprehensive audit process that supports compliance with FDA Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) requirements (21 CFR Part 820) for Class I medical devices. Spectroplast/Ricoh UK is certified under FDA ISO 10993 standards for biological evaluation of medical devices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction patients who have received a prior mastectomy (either unilateral or bilateral) on the breast undergoing reconstruction
- Patients who received mastectomies for oncologic or prophylactic indications
- Patients receiving either immediate or delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction
- Age 18 or older at the time of patient consent and DIEP flap surgery
You may not qualify if:
- History of any prior tissue expander placement or breast reconstruction on the breast undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction
- Patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction for indications other than oncologic or prophylactic post-mastectomy breast reconstruction
- Under the age of 18 at the time of patient consent or DIEP flap surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (2)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Duke Raleigh Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2026
First Posted
June 26, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
July 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Confidentiality of subject data will be ensured by de-identification of subject data. During data collection, subject identifiers and relevant data elements will be recorded in the database. Then, study-specific identification numbers will be assigned to each subject. Prior to dissemination of any information in this database beyond the DUMC's secure servers or firewall, all identifiers will be stripped from the database and data will only be referenced by the study-specific identification numbers. The adequacy of the Duke Research Data Lifecycle will be evaluated and approved by the Surgery CRU and IT personnel prior to study conduct. Any publications or presentations that result from this research will not identify any subjects individually and will present data in aggregate form only. Data collected as part of this study will not be submitted to the FDA; data collected will only be used for publication as part of an assessment of device efficacy.