Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) in Peru: Mechanisms of Individual and Intergenerational Change
2 other identifiers
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recent advances in intervention research have revealed the promise of transdiagnostic, modular approaches implemented by lay paraprofessionals for the treatment of the most prevalent mental health concerns in settings affected by adversity (e.g., anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress), but to date, few effectiveness trials have examined the indirect effects of treatment on intergenerational and economic outcomes or moderators of treatment effectiveness. There is thus a critical need not only for the continued expansion of the evidence-basis for care in low-resource settings, but also for the evaluation of factors contributing to effectiveness across multiple dimensions to gain a better understanding of the sustainability, long-term benefits, and cost-effectiveness of these approaches. The current study will conduct a rigorous evaluation of an existing program, the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) with women (N=300) who are mothers of young children (ages 4-6). The trial will take place in the context of an integrated community care setting in Lima, Peru's most populous and impoverished district, San Juan de Lurigancho. The primary aims are to (1) evaluate the primary and indirect effects of CETA (2) examine moderators of treatment effectiveness, including implementation quality and neighborhood factors and (3) examine CETA's cost effectiveness. The central hypotheses are that (H1a) CETA will improve women's mental health, intimate partner violence, and parenting and that (H1b) CETA will have indirect benefits for women's economic outcomes and for their children's adjustment. It is also hypothesized (H2) that effectiveness will be enhanced by strong implementation quality and the presence of neighborhood promotive factors, and weakened by neighborhood disadvantage. Hypotheses will be evaluated using an RCT employing a longitudinal design with assessments at baseline (T1), post-test (T2), 6-month follow-up (T3) and 12-month follow-up (T4). Women will be randomized into the intervention condition (CETA + Enhanced Case Management \[ECM\]) or the comparison condition (ECM). Robust, multi-source (i.e., participant, therapist, supervisor, census data) and multi-method data (i.e., interview, observational assessment, google street view coding) will be gathered. The contribution will be significant by advancing research on both direct and long-term benefits of maternal mental health care for family systems, and is likely to provide important insights into the sustainability and cost effectiveness of these approaches. The expected outcome is an evidence-based, cost-effective, integrated approach to maternal mental health care that can be readily implemented by local organizations. Further, it is anticipated that learnings from this project will respond to broader global public health concerns and provide opportunity for cross-context reciprocal innovation. Expanding the evaluation of CETA delivered in Spanish not only has advantages for the specific context under study, but provides an important foundation for addressing health disparities in Spanish-language mental health services in the US as well.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started May 2026
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2030
June 25, 2026
June 1, 2026
4 years
June 5, 2026
June 19, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Depression
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale: Scores from from 0 to 60, where low scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Posttraumatic Stress
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: Scores range from 0 to 80, where lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Anxiety
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7: Scores range from 0-21, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Wellbeing
WHO-5 Wellbeing Index: Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Intimate Partner Violence
Escala de Violencia; Scores range from 0-3, with lower scores indicating lower frequency of violence.
Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Parenting - observed
Dyadic Parent Child Interaction Coding System: Scoring is a tally based system based on number of specific behaviors present; low scores indicate lower frequency of behavior and higher scores indicate higher frequency of behavior. Range floor is zero, with no set ceiling.
Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Parenting - Self-reported
Alabama Parenting Scale - Preschool Version: Positive parenting ranges from 0-48, inconsistent parenting from 0-28 and punitive parenting from 0-20. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of parenting behavior.
Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Child Adjustment
Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Emotion regulation & prosocial skills
Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Days out of work
Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Investment in children
Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Time investment in children
Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CETA + Enhanced Case Management
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receiving CETA will receive a modular CBT 1-on-1 therapeutic program for approximately 12 weeks. They will also receive access to the standard of care provided by the partner agency (enhanced case management).
Enhanced Case Management
ACTIVE COMPARATORECM will include a needs assessment and referral to needed resources, with a follow-up interview after approximately 12 weeks to see which resources were accessed.
Interventions
CETA was designed for implementation with lay paraprofessionals working in LMICs. It has shown evidence of effectiveness in addressing posttraumatic stress, depression, anxiety, IPV, substance use, and suicide/safety issues. CETA employs a precision science approach using a modular framework. That is, all participants receive a common core of elements (i.e., Engagement, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, \[and for this study\] Caregiver Skills) with additional specific elements guided by individual symptom presentation, thus balancing standardization and personalization. Elements of CETA include: Engagement, Psychoeducation, Anxiety Management Strategies, Behavioral Activation, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, Imaginal \& Live Gradual Exposure, Suicide/Homicide/Danger Assessment and Planning, and Substance Use CBT/MI for Alcohol and Drug Use. The Caregiver Skills module includes information about effective parenting skills for preschool-aged children such as praise, selective
Women assigned to both conditions will receive ECM, which is a standardized (already existing) service at INFAM that includes four stages: intake, referral, guided support, and follow-up. At intake, women will participate in a structured interview that includes a brief assessment of multisystem risk and protective factors (i.e., social, economic, daily living, basic needs, and physical and mental health). Depending on assessed needs, women will be referred to relevant services. As needed, the social worker will provide guided support for accessing services (e.g., helping with paperwork for insurance applications). The ECM process is concluded by a follow-up interview to ascertain progress in accessing referrals and documents women's progress toward identified social service referral goals across domains.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- live in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru,
- be at least 18 years of age,
- have a child between the ages of 4 and 6, and
- have the ability to travel to INFAM for study assessments and treatment sessions
You may not qualify if:
- living outside of San Juan de Lurigancho,
- those who are unable or unwilling to attend in-person sessions, or
- the presence of severe intellectual disabilities or mental illness (these individuals will be referred to other local services)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Patrizio Peyton
Lima, Peru
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2026
First Posted
June 25, 2026
Study Start
May 18, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2030
Last Updated
June 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Code an analytic plan will be made available as a part of publications; study protocol will be published open access during the study
- Access Criteria
- All study data will be open access with the exception of raw data, which is available by reasonable request.
De-identified data will be shared at the conclusion of the study.