NCT07667049

Brief Summary

NEC, a life-threatening, GI emergency characterized by increased IP, affects approximately 7 to 10% of preterm neonates, and typically occurs within 7 to 14 days of birth with mortality as high as 30-50%. NEC symptoms mainly involve GI dysfunction, such as abdominal distension and feeding intolerance, but the presentation can be non-specific with few warning signs. Current therapies may be invasive, including surgical interventions that are often ineffective due to the rapid progression of the disease. Prematurity is the greatest risk factor for development of NEC due to physiological immaturity of the GI tract and altered levels of the normal GI microbiota. Several studies suggest that the initiation of an intense systemic and local inflammatory cascade leads to intestinal necrosis . Antenatal exposure to infection/inflammation may predispose the developing intestinal mucosa to subsequent injury or dysregulated inflammatory responses. Previous studies have linked presence of amniotic fluid infection/elevated cytokines, cord blood cytokines, and umbilical cord inflammation with risk for NEC in preterm neonates. In a rat model of NEC, maternal prenatal exposure to microbial LPS led to increased frequency and severity of intestinal injury. Taken together, these observations suggest that intestinal injury may be initiated in utero and contributes to increased IP at birth in the preterm neonate. Many of the defense mechanisms present in the mature intestine, such as peristalsis and tight junctions between intestinal epithelial cells are decreased in an immature intestine, and thus bacteria normally confined to the intestinal lumen are able to reach systemic organs and tissues. Bacterial translocation triggers the activation of an exaggerated inflammatory response, which leads to further epithelial damage. Our analysis of the initial cohort of 43 preterm infants, and others' previous studies have shown that IP is high at birth in preterms (\<33wk gestation) with a rapid maturation of the intestinal barrier over the first 2 weeks. However, in some infants, high IP persisted and/or recurred in association with altered levels of the normal microbiota (bacteria community composition). Specifically, the investigators observed that (1) rapid maturation of intestinal barrier function, characterized by decreased IP, correlates with increased microbial community diversity (Figure 1), and most outstandingly, the increased abundance of beneficial bacteria Clostridiales (Figure 2); (2) Clostridiales is highly transcriptionally active and co-active with the probiotic bacterium Bifidobacterium; (3) neonatal factors, including early introduction of breast milk, shorter period of antibiotic exposure, and later gestational age, favor the early colonization of the gut microbiota by members of Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium, which altogether are associated with improved intestinal barrier in preterm infants; (4) low Clostridiales spp. abundance (\<5%) and early gestational age (\<31.7wk) were identified to be the most discriminatory features for elevated IP by supervised learning scheme, reaching an accuracy of 86.1%. (5) Clostridiales and Bifidobacteriales are the most abundant bacteria groups in later stages (phase II/III at 6-18 months of age) as shown in Figure 2, suggesting a process of gaining prosperity of these two bacterial groups during intestine development after birth. Altogether our preliminary results suggest the early colonization of the natural occurring probiotics strains Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium strongly associate with rapid maturation of intestinal barrier function, and their measurement are highly promising for early detection and as potential nutritional supplement to prevent NEC in the high-risk preterm population. Investigators propose in this study to recruit additional 150 mother-infant dyads (justified in study size analysis in research design), to address our hypothesis that the two naturally occurring beneficial bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium are rapidly gaining prosperity during normal intestine development in association with improved barrier function measured by La/Rh ratio. This continuation of the initial study builds on the previous findings that identified commensal bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium species as a strong indicator to the lowered IP and rapid maturation of intestinal barrier, to substantiate measurement of these probiotic strains combined with associated neonatal factors to form an accurate, rapid detection of intestinal permeability abnormality. The investigators propose in this study to recruit additional 150 mother-infant dyads (justified in study size analysis in research design), to address our hypothesis that the two naturally occurring beneficial bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium are rapidly gaining prosperity during normal intestine development in association with improved barrier function measured by La/Rh ratio.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
11mo left

Started Jul 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress5%
Jul 2026Jun 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2026

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2026

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

July 6, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Intestinal permeabilitynecrotizing enterocolitispreterm infantsdual sugar probe test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement of intestinal permeability

    The study outcome measures will be intestinal permeability (quantitative) and leaky gut (binary). Increased levels of urine Lactulose/Rhamnose \[La/Rh\] ratio \>0.05 will identify infants with increased intestinal permeability (IP).

    1 year

Study Arms (1)

Lactulose-Rhamnose solution

OTHER
Drug: measurement of intestinal permeability

Interventions

Measure intestinal permeability by use of non-digestable sugars known to not cross the intestinal barrier in normal healthy intestinal tissue.

Lactulose-Rhamnose solution

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 4 Days
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • \<5 days Gestational age 24-32 weeks

You may not qualify if:

  • Nonviable or planned withdrawal of care
  • Significant GI dysfunction (e.g. heme-positive stools, abdominal distension (girth \>2 cm baseline), or bilious emesis/ aspirates.
  • Triplet or higher order multiple
  • Severe asphyxia
  • Lethal chromosome abnormalities
  • Cyanotic congenital heart disease
  • Intestinal atresia or perforation
  • Abdominal wall defects
  • Known galactosemia or other galactose intolerance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (12)

  • van Elburg RM, Fetter WP, Bunkers CM, Heymans HS. Intestinal permeability in relation to birth weight and gestational and postnatal age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jan;88(1):F52-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.1.f52.

    PMID: 12496227BACKGROUND
  • Noone C, Menzies IS, Banatvala JE, Scopes JW. Intestinal permeability and lactose hydrolysis in human rotaviral gastroenteritis assessed simultaneously by non-invasive differential sugar permeation. Eur J Clin Invest. 1986 Jun;16(3):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb01332.x.

    PMID: 3089818BACKGROUND
  • Malagon I, Onkenhout W, Klok M, van der Poel PF, Bovill JG, Hazekamp MG. Gut permeability in neonates after a stage 1 Norwood procedure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):547-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000175990.72753.97.

    PMID: 16148815BACKGROUND
  • Piena M, Albers MJ, Van Haard PM, Gischler S, Tibboel D. Introduction of enteral feeding in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after evaluation of intestinal permeability changes. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jan;33(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90355-4.

    PMID: 9473094BACKGROUND
  • Albers MJ, Steyerberg EW, Hazebroek FW, Mourik M, Borsboom GJ, Rietveld T, Huijmans JG, Tibboel D. Glutamine supplementation of parenteral nutrition does not improve intestinal permeability, nitrogen balance, or outcome in newborns and infants undergoing digestive-tract surgery: results from a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Apr;241(4):599-606. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000157270.24991.71.

    PMID: 15798461BACKGROUND
  • Rouwet EV, Heineman E, Buurman WA, ter Riet G, Ramsay G, Blanco CE. Intestinal permeability and carrier-mediated monosaccharide absorption in preterm neonates during the early postnatal period. Pediatr Res. 2002 Jan;51(1):64-70. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200201000-00012.

    PMID: 11756641BACKGROUND
  • Piena-Spoel M, Albers MJ, ten Kate J, Tibboel D. Intestinal permeability in newborns with necrotizing enterocolitis and controls: Does the sugar absorption test provide guidelines for the time to (re-)introduce enteral nutrition? J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Apr;36(4):587-92. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22288.

    PMID: 11283883BACKGROUND
  • Beach RC, Menzies IS, Clayden GS, Scopes JW. Gastrointestinal permeability changes in the preterm neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1982 Feb;57(2):141-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.2.141.

    PMID: 7065710BACKGROUND
  • van Wijck K, Verlinden TJ, van Eijk HM, Dekker J, Buurman WA, Dejong CH, Lenaerts K. Novel multi-sugar assay for site-specific gastrointestinal permeability analysis: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;32(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

    PMID: 22892368BACKGROUND
  • van Wijck K, Bessems BA, van Eijk HM, Buurman WA, Dejong CH, Lenaerts K. Polyethylene glycol versus dual sugar assay for gastrointestinal permeability analysis: is it time to choose? Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:139-50. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S31799. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

    PMID: 22888267BACKGROUND
  • Bjarnason I. Intestinal permeability. Gut. 1994 Jan;35(1 Suppl):S18-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s18.

    PMID: 8125384BACKGROUND
  • Fasano A. Physiological, pathological, and therapeutic implications of zonulin-mediated intestinal barrier modulation: living life on the edge of the wall. Am J Pathol. 2008 Nov;173(5):1243-52. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080192. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

    PMID: 18832585BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EnterocolitisGastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Marcela Pasetti, PhD

    University of Maryland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2026

First Posted

June 24, 2026

Study Start

July 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Last Updated

July 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share