Comparison of Early Pleural Irrigation Strategy With Saline to the Standard of Care for the Management of Complicated Pleural Infections.
EPISSOC
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Early Pleural Irrigation Strategy With Saline to the Standard of Care for the Management of Complicated Pleural Infections.
1 other identifier
interventional
244
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) is regarded by recent guidelines as a "rescue" therapy for managing complicated pleural infections; however, it is associated with significant side effects, including pleural bleeding, pain, and fever. Pleural irrigation with saline may serve as an alternative, yet evidence supporting its effectiveness is limited to a single small- scale, single-center randomized trial. The objective of the study is to compare the risk of treatment failure at 30 days (defined as a composite outcome that includes death, the need for thoracic surgery, or additional intrapleural enzyme therapy) between an early pleural irrigation strategy and standard care for complicated pleural infections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2026
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2029
July 1, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 years
June 18, 2026
June 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of treatment failure
Treatment failure, defined as a composite outcome that includes death, the need for thoracic surgery, or additional intrapleural enzyme therapy. This criterion will be assessed at 30 days.
at 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Volume of pleural fluid drained from randomization
at day 3
Incidence of adverse events
at 90 days
Intra-hospital mortality
at 30 days
Intra-hospital mortality
at 90 days
Rate of thoracic surgery
at 30 days
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intrapleural irrigation
EXPERIMENTALExperimental group: 500 mL bags of 0.9% sodium chloride will be administered into the thoracic cavity via the chest tube using a three way tap and gravity (no infusion pump or pressure). The infusion is followed by free drainage with thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O). This process will occur twices daily for a total of 6 irrigations.
standard care
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group: Standard care includes pleural drainage with 20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride flushes administered twice daily for 3 days to maintain tube patency. Thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O) will be applied to chest tubes.
Interventions
500 mL bags of 0.9% sodium chloride will be administered into the thoracic cavity via the chest tube using a three way tap and gravity (no infusion pump or pressure). The infusion is followed by free drainage with thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O). This process will occur two times daily for a total of 6 irrigations.
Standard care includes pleural drainage with 20 mL 0.9% sodium chloride flushes administered two times daily for 3 days to maintain tube patency. Thoracic suction (up to -20 cmH2O) will be applied to chest tubes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years old) capable of fully understanding the study;
- Complicated pleural infection (macroscopically purulent fluid, positive for bacteria on Gram's staining, positive on culture for bacterial infection, loculated effusion, pH \<7.2, great abundance) leading to thoracic drainage;
- Initial ultrasound evaluation to estimate pleural fluid abundance and detect fibrinous septation;
- Social security affiliation
- Written informed consent
- Highly effective contraceptive methods for women of childbearing age include: Combined hormonal contraception (estrogen and progestogen) associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable); intrauterine device; hormone- releasing intrauterine system; bilateral occlusion of the Fallopian tubes; vasectomized partner; sexual abstinence
You may not qualify if:
- Tuberculous pleural effusions;
- Previous treatment with intrapleural fibrinolytic agents (urokinase, streptokinase, alteplase, or DNase) or intrapleural saline lavage;
- Previous thoracic surgery for pleural infection;
- Contraindications to auxiliary treatments, to fibrinolysis or surgery as well as to procedures such as drainage and lavage;
- Pregnancy or lactation;
- Expected survival of less than 3 months;
- Thoracic drainage since more than 24h;
- Patient deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision or placed under judicial protection (guardianship or supervision);
- Inability to give informed written consent;
- Participation in another clinical trial;
- Patient being a relative of the investigator or any member of the team directly involved in the study, including assistant physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and coordinators
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amienslead
- University Hospital, Toulousecollaborator
- Central Hospital Saint Quentincollaborator
- CRC CHI Creteil Francecollaborator
- University Hospital, Tourscollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmescollaborator
- University Hospital, Brestcollaborator
- CH Morlaixcollaborator
- University Hospital, Caencollaborator
- University Hospital, Rouencollaborator
- University Hospital, Angerscollaborator
- Hospices Civils de Lyoncollaborator
- CH Pontoisecollaborator
- CH Avignoncollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier VALENCIENNEScollaborator
- CH Le Havrecollaborator
- Tenon Hospital, Pariscollaborator
- University Hospital, Bordeauxcollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Argenteuilcollaborator
- University Hospital, Strasbourg, Francecollaborator
- Nantes University Hospitalcollaborator
- CH Haguenaucollaborator
- CHU de Reimscollaborator
- Centre Hospitalier Alpes Lemancollaborator
- Central Hospital, Nancy, Francecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, Picardie, 80054, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2026
First Posted
June 24, 2026
Study Start
May 13, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2029
Last Updated
July 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share