Experimental Study and Training for Tanzanian Students and Health Professionals With a New Simulator for Manual Neonatal Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to build capacity and assess the teaching effectiveness of a new simulator for manual neonatal ventilation in third-year nursing and clinical officer students, as well as healthcare professionals from the neonatology, gynecology, and pediatric departments. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the high-fidelity active setup of the simulator improve the percentage of target pressure achieved and the mean ventilation frequency compared to other configurations?
- How do different simulator configurations affect the training outcomes of unexperienced and experienced personnel, based on objective evaluations by expert clinicians and knowledge surveys?
- What is the self-reported usability and perceived usefulness of the different simulator configurations among the trainees? Researchers will compare a medium-fidelity passive setup, a high-fidelity passive setup with mechanical feedback, and a high-fidelity active setup with both mechanical and sensor feedback to see if the high-fidelity active configuration results in significantly higher clinical performance scores and better achievement of ventilation targets. Participants will:
- Attend theoretical frontal lectures covering manual emergency ventilation procedures and medical simulation.
- Complete pre-training and post-training surveys to assess baseline knowledge, evaluate acquired skills, and report on the simulator's usability.
- Participate in hands-on simulator training, practicing the clinical procedure (positioning the newborn, positioning the mask, and ventilating) three times.
- Undergo a final simulation session for evaluation, where performance is objectively scored by a tutor and automatically recorded by the simulator's sensors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2026
CompletedJune 24, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 days
June 11, 2026
June 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP) (Objective 1)
The primary outcome, used to assess the Objective 1, was the ventilatory performance measured by the simulator, i.e. Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP) during hands-on training on Day 2 and Day 3, and the evaluation session on Day 4. In accordance with international guidelines, we considered as gold-standard a PIP of 25 cmH₂O (centimeters of water). For each participant and trial, we computed the mean and standard deviation of PIP.
Day 2, Day 3 and Day 4
Ventilation Rate (Objective 1)
The other primary outcome, used to assess the Objective 1, was the ventilatory performance measured by the simulator, i.e. Ventilation Rate during hands-on training on Day 2 and Day 3, and the evaluation session on Day 4. In accordance with international guidelines, we considered as gold-standard a Ventilation Rate of 40 breaths per minute. For each participant and trial, we computed the mean and standard deviation of the Ventilation Rate .
Day 2, Day 3 and Day 4
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Skill acquisition assessment (Objectives 2 and 3)
Day 1 and day 4
Other Outcomes (1)
User-reported usability and perceived usefulness (Objective 4)
Day 4
Study Arms (3)
Training with simulator configuration A
EXPERIMENTALGroup A used a medium-fidelity passive setup of the simulator without mechanical feedback or mobile user interface guidance.
Training with simulator configuration B
EXPERIMENTALGroup B used a high-fidelity passive setup of the simulator providing mechanical feedback through chest and/or abdominal rise, without mobile user interface guidance.
Training with simulator configuration C
EXPERIMENTALGroup C used a high-fidelity active setup of the simulator combining mechanical feedback with real-time sensor-based guidance via a mobile user interface.
Interventions
Medical training on manual neonatal ventilation with phisical simulator
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Third-year nursing students enrolled at the Tosamaganga Institute of Health and Allied Sciences (TIHAS).
- Third-year clinical officer students enrolled at TIHAS.
- Healthcare professionals working at Tosamaganga Hospital within the neonatology, gynecology, midwifery, and pediatrics departments.
- Individuals who voluntarily choose to attend the course.
You may not qualify if:
- Healthcare professionals working in fields outside of nursing, gynecology, midwifery, neonatology, and pediatrics.
- Participants who fail to complete the full training program, either by not attending all sessions or by prematurely withdrawing from the course.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tosamaganga Regional Referral Hospital
Tosamaganga, Iringa, P.O. Box 11, Tanzania
Related Publications (4)
Maglio S, Tamirat S, Tesfaye M, Wolde M, Tognarelli S, Menciassi A, Facci E. Toward the design of a tailored training course for birth assistance: an Ethiopian experience. Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Jan 26;47:32. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.32.42221. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38586071BACKGROUNDTuratsinze S, Willson A, Sessions H, Cartledge PT. Medical student satisfaction and confidence in simulation-based learning in Rwanda - Pre and post-simulation survey research. Afr J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;10(2):84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
PMID: 32612914BACKGROUNDBoling B, Hardin-Pierce M. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on knowledge and confidence in critical care training: An integrative review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
PMID: 26520213BACKGROUNDLee HC, Strand ML, Finan E, Illuzzi J, Kamath-Rayne BD, Kapadia V, Mahgoub M, Niermeyer S, Schexnayder SM, Schmolzer GM, Weglarz J, Williams AL, Weiner GM, Wyckoff M, Yamada NK, Szyld E. Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2025 American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2025 Oct 21;152(16_suppl_2):S385-S423. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001367. Epub 2025 Oct 22.
PMID: 41122887BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2026
First Posted
June 24, 2026
Study Start
June 17, 2025
Primary Completion
June 20, 2025
Study Completion
June 20, 2025
Last Updated
June 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Starting date: Janualy 1st 2026 End date: November 30st 2026
- Access Criteria
- Data can be accessed by reseachers upon request only for reseach purpose and with a signed data access agreement after approval of a proposal. Any request can be sent to arianna.menciassi@santannapisa.it
Anonimized and aggregated data corresponding to the primary outcomes (mean and standard deviations of PIP and Ventilation Rate per trial per group).