NCT07662967

Brief Summary

Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytological slides obtained during EBUS-TBNA improves diagnostic yield by providing real-time adequacy assessment and preliminary diagnostic orientation after each needle pass. In centers without a dedicated cytopathologist, ROSE is performed by a second interventional pulmonologist acting as a dedicated ROSE operator (interventional pulmonologist-performed ROSE, IP-ROSE), a model associated with good but variable diagnostic performance compared to cytopathologist-performed ROSE. This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary diagnostic performance of an investigational artificial intelligence prototype for digital ROSE. The prototype, developed in-house by the Principal Investigator, analyzes microscopic images of Diff-Quik stained cytological slides acquired through a dedicated digital microscope, together with basic clinical data, via API calls to a multimodal AI model. It produces two outputs: sample adequacy (appropriate/not appropriate) and malignancy suspicion (benign/malignant), each with a confidence score. The AI output is recorded in the study database for research purposes only and is not shown to the operator in real time; it does not influence clinical decisions during the procedure. The study is a prospective, monocentric, observational pilot study enrolling 65 adult patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA or peripheral TBNA with IP-ROSE at a single interventional pulmonology unit. The primary statistical unit is the individual ROSE slide, with an expected 130 to 160 evaluable slides. Co-primary endpoints are: (1) technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds; and (2) AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%. Secondary endpoints include AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion, agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator, and AI output latency. The AI prototype is not a commercially approved or CE-marked medical device. It was developed internally by the Principal Investigator for research purposes and is evaluated exclusively within this study. Data from this pilot study will inform the design of a subsequent confirmatory non-inferiority trial, which will be the subject of separate registration and ethical approval.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started Jul 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Jul 2026Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

June 23, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 17, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

bronchoscopyartificial intelligence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • technical feasibility of the AI prototype

    technical feasibility of the AI prototype, defined as the proportion of slides with valid AI output within 90 seconds

    6 months

  • AI accuracy

    AI accuracy for sample adequacy assessment compared to the definitive cytopathological diagnosis, with an expected 95% confidence interval precision of ±5.5%

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • AI accuracy for malignancy suspicion

    6 months

  • Agreement between the AI prototype and the IP-ROSE operator

    6 months

  • AI output latency

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy

patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected malignant disease of the lung or mediastinum or for suspected interstitial lung disease

Diagnostic Test: ROSE

Interventions

ROSEDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Bronchologist's Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE) compared with those of the AI and then compared with the pathological anatomy report

Also known as: AI-ROSE, IP-ROSE
patients with an indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

patients with clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Clinical indication for diagnostic bronchoscopy with EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and/or TBNA on peripheral lung lesions, according to ACCP/ERS-ESTS guidelines and the Unit's diagnostic pathways.
  • The procedure will be performed in two-person mode with IP-ROSE performed as per the center's SOP.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to undergo the required follow-up.

You may not qualify if:

  • Absolute contraindications to bronchoscopy.
  • Known histological diagnosis of the target lesion (except re-staging).
  • Concomitant interventional procedures that alter the standard sequence.
  • Inability to provide written informed consent.
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, compromises patient safety or the reliability of the data.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung NeoplasmsDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Matilde Boccia, Medical Doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2026

First Posted

June 23, 2026

Study Start

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

June 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share