The Impact of Shoulder Immobilization by Orthoses on Human Joint Biomechanics and Inter-joint Coordination
Biomechanics
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Shoulder joint orthoses are commonly used for patients with shoulder disorders to stabilize and protect shoulder joint after injury or surgery. These devices maintain proper anatomical alignment of the shoulder joint and surrounding soft tissues, reducing pain, facilitating proper recovery, and preventing further injury. Commonly used shoulder orthoses include shoulder sling, abduction brace, and figure-of-eight shoulder brace. The appropriate orthosis is selected based on patient's specific clinical needs, and it should be worn for an appropriate duration to avoid over or inadequate shoulder immobilization. When patients wear shoulder orthoses during daily activities, such as sit-to-stand, level walking, climbing stairs, or overcoming obstacles of a certain height, the immobilized shoulder reduces reciprocal arm swing, altering body's balance mechanism and potentially increasing the risk of falls. Different shoulder orthoses with various shoulder position affect human motor coordination and balance to varying degrees. Therefore, assessing the changes in body movements caused by shoulder immobilization with orthoses can provide crucial clinical information to aid in clinical decision-making. This study utilizes stereophotogrammetry to measure and analyze subjects' motion changes while their shoulders are immobilized with orthoses. It aims to understand the biomechanical changes when subjects participate in static balance tests and dynamic activities. Through corresponding biomechanical analyses, including kinematics, dynamics, and joint coordination, the study seeks to understand the extent of the impact of shoulder orthoses on human movements. This information would serve as important reference data for subsequent clinical decisions regarding whether to use orthoses or not, the duration of use, and the suitability of the orthoses for patients of different ages.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2030
June 22, 2026
February 1, 2026
4.1 years
February 3, 2026
June 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Crossing speed in m/s
VICON system would record the distance of body movement while participants crossing the obstacle, and crossing speed would be calculate as Distance divided by time (m/s)
From enrollment to 6 months follow-up
Toe-obstacle distance in mm and joint angles in degree(°)
VICON system would record the distance between big toe and obstacle, recorded as toe clearance in mm. Also the position of body segments would be recorded to calculate hip, knee and ankle joints, recorded as degree in °.
From enrollment to 6 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change of joint angle in degree(°)
From enrollment to 6 months follow-up
Study Arms (1)
Joint immobilization by sling
EXPERIMENTALParticipants would wear a simple shoulder sling to immobilize unilateral side of shoulder joint.
Interventions
Unilateral shoulder joint immobilized by simple shoulder sling
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with mid-shaft clavicle fractures aged between 20-65 years old. Free from any neuromusculoskeletal disease of the lower limbs and the lower back except for the clavicle fractures
- Patients with acute shoulder rotators severe rupture aged between 20-65 years old. Free from any neuromusculoskeletal disease of the lower limbs and the lower back except for the shoulder rotators rupture.
- Healthy controls with age, height, and weight matched to patient groups. Free from any neuromusculoskeletal disease of the lower limbs and the lower back.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who have other gait altering disorders.
- Age below 20 or above 65.
- If a female participant is pregnant, she will be excluded until recovery from pregnancy.
- If he/she rejects to give his/her informed consent.
- Has any neuromusculoskeletal diseases, orthopedic or medical diseases other than shoulder injuries resulting in difficulty of motion and ambulation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan, 100229, Taiwan
Related Publications (6)
Tung JY, Gage WH, Poupart P, McIlroy WE. Upper limb contributions to frontal plane balance control in rollator-assisted walking. Assist Technol. 2014 Spring;26(1):15-21; quiz 22-3. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.789456.
PMID: 24800450BACKGROUNDBostrom KJ, Dirksen T, Zentgraf K, Wagner H. The Contribution of Upper Body Movements to Dynamic Balance Regulation during Challenged Locomotion. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jan 26;12:8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00008. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29434544BACKGROUNDForero J, Misiaszek JE. Balance-corrective responses to unexpected perturbations at the arms during treadmill walking. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Oct 1;112(7):1790-800. doi: 10.1152/jn.00719.2013. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
PMID: 25031255BACKGROUNDMarigold DS, Patla AE. Adapting locomotion to different surface compliances: neuromuscular responses and changes in movement dynamics. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1733-50. doi: 10.1152/jn.00019.2005. Epub 2005 May 11.
PMID: 15888535BACKGROUNDHorak, F.B. and J.M. Macpherson, Postural Orientation and Equilibrium. Comprehensive Physiology, 2011: p. 255-292.
BACKGROUNDMohebbi A, Amiri P, Kearney RE. Identification of human balance control responses to visual inputs using virtual reality. J Neurophysiol. 2022 Apr 1;127(4):1159-1170. doi: 10.1152/jn.00283.2021. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
PMID: 35353629BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
YAO-CHANG LO, M.D.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2026
First Posted
June 22, 2026
Study Start
November 27, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2030
Last Updated
June 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It's a independent research by PI.