NCT07655284

Brief Summary

Radical Cystectomy (RC) remains the gold standard for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC); however, use of ureteral stents at time of surgery remains controversial without level 1 evidence to comment on risks or benefits of their use. RC complications commonly include urinary tract infections (UTIs), pyelonephritis, ureteroileal leakage and stenosis, and can occur with either ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder diversions. Traditionally, ureteral stents are thought to support anastomotic healing and reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage and strictures; however, emerging evidence from retrospective studies suggests that stent use may paradoxically increase rates of postoperative morbidity. This randomized, multicenter and prospective study aims to compare 30-day postoperative complication rates between stented and non-stented urinary diversions in patients undergoing RC for MIBC, in both ileal conduit or neobladder with either robotic or open approaches.

Trial Health

67
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
190

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
37mo left

Started Sep 2026

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2026

Expected
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2029

2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2029

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Status Verified

June 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

bladder cancercystectomyureteral stents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative readmission rate

    percent of patients re-admitted

    30-days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • length of stay

    30 days

  • procedure duration

    30 days

  • blood transfusion rate

    30 days

  • Emergency room visits

    30 days

  • patient reported pain on analog scale

    30 days

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

ureteral stents placed at time of cystectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

standard of care ureteral stent placement at time of radical cystectomy (control arm)

Device: ureteral stents

stent-free, no stent placement at time of cystectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

forgo ureteral stent placement at time of radical cystectomy (intervention arm)

Device: no ureteral stent

Interventions

standard of care single-J externalized ureteral stents to be placed at time of radical cystectomy

ureteral stents placed at time of cystectomy

no ureteral stents used at time of radical cystectomy

stent-free, no stent placement at time of cystectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults (\> 18 years old)
  • Muscle invasive bladder cancer or non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with indication of Radical Cystectomy
  • No concomitant surgeries like nephrectomies, colectomies or removal of other organs affected by the tumor (Except standard lymph node dissections as well as in men the prostate and seminal vesicles and in women the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries and vagina, that are considered part of the oncological radical cystectomy.)
  • Patients who have the capacity to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • History of prior urinary diversion
  • Patients who decline to participate, lack understanding of the study's purpose, or are unable to provide informed consent
  • Cystectomy for other reasons than Bladder cancer
  • Previous radiation therapy in the pelvis for any reason
  • Extremely debilitated patients, malnourished individuals, or those undergoing palliative or hygienic cystectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP)

São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Timothy N Clinton, MD

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Timothy N Clinton, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2026

First Posted

June 17, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2029

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

As part of IRB approval of the study decision was for privacy policy that only aggregated data would be intended to be shared outside the institutional system and any IPD would be solely stored on HIPAA compliant servers at the facility. De-identified or aggregated data would be permitted to be shared so long as subjects could not be identified.

Locations