Fluorescence-Guided Surgical Resection for Reducing Unexpected Positive Margins in Patients With Sarcoma, SarcoSIGHT Trial
SarcoSIGHT: A Randomized-Control Trial of Fluorescence Guided Sarcoma Surgery Versus the Standard of Care
3 other identifiers
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This phase II trial compares standard of care surgical resection to fluorescence-guided surgical resection using indocyanine green and fluorescence imaging for reducing unexpected positive margin rates in patients with sarcoma. Surgical margins are one of the criteria used in assessing the effectiveness of a given surgical procedure. They are the edges or border of the tissue removed in cancer surgery. A negative margin means that the resected tumor is surrounded by normal tissue, which implies there is no disease left in the patient. By contrast, a positive margin means that sarcoma cells are visible at the edge of the tumor. Positive margins may be classified as planned when they are expected pre-operatively due to the preservation of a critical structure, or unexpected when the pathologist reports the presence of tumor at the margin despite the surgeon having intended to remove it in its entirety. Fluorescence-guided surgery is an established surgical method that involves the administration of fluorescent dye (in this case, indocyanine green) into the tumor, which can then be visualized with a special camera during surgery to help surgeons identify tumor versus healthy tissue. Fluorescence-guided surgery may reduce the rate of unexpected positive margins in patients undergoing surgery for sarcoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started May 2027
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2028
June 22, 2026
June 1, 2026
12 months
June 9, 2026
June 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Unexpected positive margin (UPM) rate
The margin status of each tumor will be taken from the pathology report for each patient enrolled in the trial. This will be recorded at six months post- surgery and will be classified according to the R classification system. The UPM rate for each arm will be defined by calculating the percentage of patients in that arm with a UPM on histopathological assessment of the resection specimen. The percentage of patients with unexpected positive margins will be calculated for each group to give the unexpected positive margin rate. This will then be compared between the two groups. Will use a logistic regression that adjusts key covariates including stratification factors used in the randomization. A Wald test and a 95% confidence interval will be extracted from this model. A two-sided p-value will be found from the Wald test.
At 6 months post-surgery
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Intraoperative complications
During surgical resection
Postoperative complications
Up to 12 months
Length of index operation
During surgical resection
Length of inpatient stay
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Recurrence
Up to 12 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm I (standard of care)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients undergo standard of care surgical resection.
Arm II (FGS)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive ICG IV 12-24 hours prior to their scheduled surgery. Patients then undergo FGS with intraoperative fluorescence imaging.
Interventions
Undergo FGS
Undergo surgical resection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented written informed consent of the participant
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of intermediate to high grade sarcoma
- All ages
- Amenable to surgical resection as a part of curative intent for the patient
- Willingness to:
- Respond to surveys during the trial
- Permit medical record/ clinical laboratory result review
You may not qualify if:
- Due for surgery with palliative intent
- Recurrent tumors
- Intracranial, retroperitoneal, and visceral anatomical locations
- A woman of childbearing potential who is currently pregnant (as confirmed by urine pregnancy test)
- A woman who are currently breastfeeding
- Known allergies to ICG, iodine, iodine dyes or shellfish
- Unable to provide written and informed consent
- Patients with hyper-thyroidism or autonomic thyroid adenomas
- Premature infants/neonates with exchange transfusion indication due to hyperbilirubinemia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- City of Hope Medical Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thinzar Lwin
City of Hope Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The histopathology staff and senior trial statistician will be blinded and unaware of the surgery type to allow for blinded measurement and analysis of primary outcome.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2026
First Posted
June 16, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
May 15, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 11, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 11, 2028
Last Updated
June 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06