Reciprocal Inhibition vs PNF for Cervical Spondylitis
RI-PNF-CS
Comparative Effects of Reciprocal Inhibition Technique and Passive PNF Stretching on Pain, Functional Disability, and Range of Motion in Cervical Spondylitis
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cervical spondylitis is a common cause of chronic neck pain and limited function. Physiotherapists often use two manual techniques: Reciprocal Inhibition (RI) and Passive Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching. However, no previous study has directly compared these two techniques in patients with confirmed cervical spondylitis. This randomized controlled trial will include 60 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylitis based on clinical and imaging findings. Participants will be randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A will receive Reciprocal Inhibition Technique. Group B will receive Passive PNF Stretching. Both groups will receive 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with three sessions per week on alternate days. Pain will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Functional disability will be measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Cervical range of motion will be measured using a standard goniometer. All measurements will be taken at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. The goal is to determine which technique is more effective for reducing pain, improving function, and increasing neck mobility in cervical spondylitis patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 24, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2026
CompletedJune 10, 2026
June 1, 2026
5 months
June 1, 2026
June 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Pain Intensity
Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 0 to 10 cm line where 0 means no pain and 10 means worst possible pain. Higher score indicates worse pain.
Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention
Change in Neck Disability Index Score
Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10-item questionnaire. Each item scores 0 to 5. Total score ranges from 0 to 50, converted to a percentage. Higher percentage indicates greater disability. Minimum detectable change is 5 points.
Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention
Change in Cervical Range of Motion
Active cervical range of motion measured using a standard universal goniometer. Movements measured: flexion, extension, right lateral flexion, left lateral flexion, right rotation, left rotation. Measured in degrees. Three trials performed per movement; average recorded.
Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention
Study Arms (2)
Reciprocal Inhibition Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive Reciprocal Inhibition Technique for cervical spine.
Passive PNF Stretching Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive Passive Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation stretching for cervical spine.
Interventions
Patient sits comfortably. Therapist applies one stretch per cervical muscle group. Each stretch: 30-second passive hold, followed by 10-second push (patient gently pushes against therapist), then 10 seconds relaxation. Two sets performed for cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. Recovery period between sets. Total 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions/week, alternate days). Performed by a licensed physiotherapist.
Patient sits upright with back support. Therapist stands behind and passively moves the patient's neck until first resistance. Patient then performs a pain-free isometric contraction against therapist's resistance for 10 seconds. After relaxation, therapist moves neck into greater range of motion. Three repetitions performed for cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. Total 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions/week, alternate days). Performed by a licensed physiotherapist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Confirmed diagnosis of cervical spondylitis by MRI or radiograph.
- Chronic neck pain lasting more than 4 months.
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 7 or higher.
- Age between 25 and 65 years.
- Willing to provide written informed consent.
- Bacteriological or histological confirmation where available.
You may not qualify if:
- Upper limb fracture or recent injury.
- Cervical radiculopathy with neurological deficit.
- Systemic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes with neuropathy).
- Congenital cervical deformity.
- Cognitive impairment preventing cooperation.
- Previous cervical spine surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Faisalabad
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, 3800, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2026
First Posted
June 10, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion
May 24, 2026
Study Completion
June 15, 2026
Last Updated
June 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share