Applied Research on a Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
Applied Research on a Group-based Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
1 other identifier
interventional
218
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to verify the short-term and long-term effects of a group-based non-pharmacological intervention program for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline, and to evaluate its implementation outcomes, through a rigorously designed cluster randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2029
June 5, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 years
May 20, 2026
June 1, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Episodic memory
Using the Huashan version of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) for assessment, it is mainly used to evaluate immediate recall, short-delay recall, long-delay recall, and other key components. The test includes 12 words belonging to three semantic categories (4 words per category). The testing procedure is as follows: The examiner reads out the 12 words in sequence, and the subject immediately recalls them. This process is repeated three consecutive times to form the immediate memory test. After an interval of 5 minutes, short-delay recall is conducted, and after 20 minutes, long-delay recall is implemented. The scoring rule is that each correctly recalled word earns 1 point. The immediate memory score is the sum of correct recalls from the first three trials (maximum score 36). This study records the scores for immediate recall, short-delay recall, and long-delay recall, with higher scores indicating better memory function.
week0,week12,week24
Gobal cognitive function
The assessment uses the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Higher scores indicate better performance, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30.
week0,week12,week24
Executive function
The Shape Trail Test (STT) was used to assess executive function. The test consists of two parts: Part A requires participants to connect 25 numbers in ascending order; Part B involves 25 numbers presented within two different shapes. The scoring indicators are the time taken to complete STT-A and STT-B, with shorter completion times indicating better executive function.
week0,week12,week24
Attention
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is used to assess the patient's attention. The subject is required to match the corresponding symbols to the numbers (1-9) as quickly as possible within 90 seconds. Each correctly filled symbol earns 1 point, and a reversed symbol earns 0.5 points. The maximum score for the test is 90.
week0,week12,week24
Linguistic function
Animal verbal fluency is used to assess a patient's language fluency. The test requires the subject to name as many examples as possible within the category of animals in one minute. Scoring is typically based on the total number of correctly named animal names. Lower scores indicate reduced language ability.
week0,weel12,week24
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Depression
week0,weel12,week24
Anxiety
week0,week12,week24
Social network
week0,week12,week24
Social participation
week0,week12,week24
Timed "Up and Go" test
week0,week12,week24
Study Arms (2)
Non-Pharmacological Interventions
EXPERIMENTALNon-Pharmacological Interventions
Waiting List Control Group
OTHERTo ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group.
Interventions
6 components(social intercourse, cognitive interventions, physical activities interventions, rational diet, understanding and risk management of diseases, emotion management)
To ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2026
First Posted
June 5, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2029
Last Updated
June 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share