Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Versus Placebo on Pain and Health Related Quality of Life of Patients With Piriformis Muscle Syndrome
PiriTox
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Versus Placebo on Pain and Health Related Quality of Life of Patients With Piriformis Muscle Syndrome
2 other identifiers
interventional
108
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Piriformis muscle syndrome (PMS) is characterized by symptoms caused by compression or irritation of the sciatic nerve by the piriformis muscle as it exits the sciatic notch. PMS commonly evokes the symptoms of sciatica and is likely underdisagnosed. Patients who experience pain related to piriformis syndrome will complain of aggravated pain after prolonged periods of sitting or upon rising from a seated position. Around 98% of patients evoke positional buttock pain, especially during prolonged sitting (car journeys, for example). This is less true for sciatic pain radiation, which is still found in 63% of cases, systematically associated with the notion of buttock pain. Treatments for PMS aim to reduce or eliminate sciatic pain and also control buttock pain. Reducing these pains can improve the physical condition and emotional state of the patient. Several approaches have been proposed including physical therapy (massage-physiotherapy, self-rehabilitation techniques) combined with the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and muscle relaxants to reduce inflammation, spasm and pain. Many patients do not respond to conventional care. Surgery may be considered only in those cases who do not improve with conservative therapy or injections. However, decompressive surgery is an invasive treatment, indicated in case of complete failure of all medical strategies, with physical and functional consequences. In recent years, several published studies showed the use of botulinum toxin (BT) injection as a new therapeutic option to reduce buttock and sciatic pain induced by PMS. The study team previously observed the efficacy of BT/A1 administration into the piriformis muscle in patients who were previously treated with medication and rehabilitation protocols with no pain improvement. Pain relief was considered as "very good" or "good" for 77% of the patients, "average" for 7.4% and "poor" for 15.6%. No adverse events were reported. More recently, Fishman and colleagues reported the results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled study including 56 patients and comparing physical therapy, incobotulinum toxin A and placebo. Data are sparse concerning BT injection for PMS and no multicenter randomized clinical trial have been performed. Two out of three randomized trials (Fishman 2004, 2017) are based on highly selected patients (3 standard deviations or more beyond on the prolongation of the posterior tibial or fibular nerve H-reflex in FAIR test). Therefore, BT efficacy may be overestimated and remains to be evaluated among unselected PMS patients, regardless of analgesic treatments or physical therapy. Finally, no randomized studies have reported the heatlh-related quality of life of PMS patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2026
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2029
June 3, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.5 years
May 29, 2026
May 29, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in sciatic pain
Measured on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) visual analog scale
From baseline to Week 6
Secondary Outcomes (52)
Change in buttock pain intensity
From baseline to Week 6
Health-related quality of life
Baseline
Health-related quality of life
Week 6
Health-related quality of life
Week 12
Health-related quality of life
Week 18
- +47 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Botulinum toxin injection
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo injection
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Incobotulinumtoxin type A (200 U in 2 mL of preservative-free normal saline) will be injected in equally divided doses (1mL; 100 U for incobotulinumtoxin A) into 2 locations in the affected buttock region
Placebo (normal saline solution and excipients described in Xeomin) will be injected in equally divided doses (1mL) into 2 locations in the affected buttock region
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Objective clinical diagnosis of unilateral piriformis syndrome for at least 3 months (as assessed by Clinical Scoring System for the Diagnosis of Piriformis Muscle Syndrome: score of 8 or greater
- Absence of herniated lumbar disc which can explain radiating pain (MRI or computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine)
- Patients not responding to conventional care (physiotherapy, muscle relaxants, analgesics)
- Baseline sciatic pain intensity of at least 4 points on visual analog scale
- Provision of written informed consent
- Patients affiliated to social security system (health insurance coverage).
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral piriformis muscle syndrome.
- History of piriformis syndrome surgery.
- History of botulinum toxin administration.
- Any treatment (general or local) likely to interfere with botulinum toxin or evaluation of the primary endpoint (Corticosteroids, aminoglycosides).
- Corticosteroids in the past 3 weeks.
- Signs of severe fibrosis (on MRI or CT) of the piriformis muscle.
- Other causes of sciatic pain (lumbar root compression, inflammatory, infectious or neoplasic pelvic disease, particularly for inflammatory sacroiliac pain).
- Hip prosthesis on the same side as piriformis syndrome; knee prosthesis is tolerated.
- Contraindication to BT injection:
- History of intolerance, hypersensitivity or known allergy to any botulinum toxin product or excipients;
- Patients with myasthenia gravis or other diseases of the neuromuscular junction;
- Patients with Lambert-Eaton Syndrome;
- Patients with neurological disorders such as dysphagia, swallowing disorders or aspiration pneumonia;
- Current infection at the proposed injection site;
- Long-term anticoagulant therapy ;
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
CHU de Besançon
Besançon, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
Hôpital Universitaire Paris Cochin
Paris, France
Institut Universitaire de Réadaptation Clémenceau
Strasbourg, France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arnaud Dupeyron
CHU Nîmes
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2026
First Posted
June 3, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2029
Last Updated
June 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05