IAU Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy Study
IAUPCNL
International Alliance of Urolithiasis Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy Study
1 other identifier
observational
4,000
1 country
4
Brief Summary
During the past 10-15 years, important advancements have been witnessed in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques and instrumentation. The development of miniaturized PCNL techniques and modern laser technologies has contributed to lower complication rates, alongside changes in exiting strategies and postoperative drainage protocols. Ultrasound is increasingly utilized to create percutaneous access, and many medical centers have transitioned to the supine position for PCNL or perform Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS). All these developments have helped to individualize treatment strategies and to improve clinical outcomes for patients. However, there remains an ongoing discussion regarding the optimal indications and limitations of the different miniaturized PCNL techniques compared to standard PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). This prospective observational study is organized under the auspices of the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) and focuses on the contemporary indications, surgical techniques, instrumentation, exiting strategies, efficacy, and risk factors for intraoperative and postoperative complications of PCNL. Participating investigators will collect data on the PCNL procedures performed in their respective clinical centers prospectively for a period of 12-18 months. The study will be initiated in each clinical center following formal approval from the IAU Scientific Committee, which will also announce the conclusion of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2026
CompletedJune 3, 2026
May 1, 2026
6.8 years
May 25, 2026
May 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Stone-Free Rate (SFR)
The primary efficacy outcome defined as the percentage of patients achieving clinical success at the 1-month follow-up evaluation. Stone-free status is defined as the complete absence of residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) characterized as measuring $\\le 3\\text{ mm}$ in maximum diameter. Efficacy and fragment clearance will be verified using the participating center's standard postoperative imaging protocols, which include kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) radiography, renal ultrasonography, or non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scans.
1 month postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Postoperative Complication Rate
Up to 30 days postoperatively
Perioperative Hemoglobin Drop
Within 24 hours postoperatively
Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)
From the day of surgery/admission until formal hospital discharge, assessed up to 14 days
Total Operative Time
During the surgical procedure
Postoperative Change in Renal Function
Preoperatively up to 1 month postoperatively
Other Outcomes (3)
Primary Percutaneous Renal Access Success Rate
During the surgical procedure
Perioperative Blood Transfusion Rate
Up to 30 days postoperatively
Intraoperative Radiation Exposure Time
During the surgical procedure
Study Arms (1)
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL)
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL)
Interventions
Patients included in this observational study undergo Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of renal calculi according to the established protocols of each participating center. The surgical procedure involves creating a percutaneous tract to the renal collecting system under ultrasound, fluoroscopic, or combined guidance. The study observes a wide spectrum of contemporary techniques, including standard-tract PCNL and miniaturized versions (Mini-PCNL), performed in either prone or supine positions. Specific procedural data are recorded, including the method of tract dilation (balloon, telescopic, or single-step), the type of lithotripsy energy used (laser, ultrasonic, or pneumatic), and postoperative drainage strategies (standard nephrostomy, tubeless, or stent-only). As an observational study, the choice of specific technique and equipment is determined by the treating surgeon based on clinical indications and institutional standards.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of consecutive adult patients (18 years or older) diagnosed with renal or proximal ureteral calculi who are candidates for percutaneous stone surgery and are treated in real-world clinical practice settings. Participants are enrolled across 21 participating secondary and tertiary referral academic medical centers and hospitals globally, capturing a highly diverse and heterogeneous international population across multiple geographic regions
You may qualify if:
- Patient age 18 years or older at the time of enrollment.
- Diagnosed with single or multiple renal calculi (including complex and staghorn calculi) or proximal ureteral stones.
- Scheduled to undergo any primary or secondary percutaneous surgical stone intervention, including standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or any of its miniaturized variations (Mini-PCNL, Ultra-mini PCNL, Super-mini PCNL, or Micro-PCNL).
- Voluntarily provided written informed consent for participation and data utilization.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient age under 18 years.
- Patients scheduled to undergo alternative primary treatment modalities for the targeted stone burden as a standalone procedure (e.g., retrograde intrarenal surgery \[RIRS\] or shockwave lithotripsy \[SWL\]).
- Presence of an active, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) or clinical urosepsis at the time of the scheduled surgical procedure.
- Uncorrected severe coagulopathy or uncorrectable bleeding diathesis.
- Missing, incomplete, or unavailable medical charts or follow-up records rendering outcome assessment impossible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Foundation Endourologylead
- The International Alliance of Urolithiasiscollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Foundation Endourology
Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1606, Bulgaria
Foundation Endourology
Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1606, Bulgaria
Foundation Endourology
Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1606, Bulgaria
Military Medical Academy, Department of Urology and Nephrology
Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1606, Bulgaria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kemal Sarika, PhD
Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye
- STUDY CHAIR
Guohua Zeng, PhD
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- STUDY CHAIR
Simon Choong, PhD
Institute of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2026
First Posted
June 3, 2026
Study Start
August 15, 2019
Primary Completion
June 15, 2026
Study Completion
June 15, 2026
Last Updated
June 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 6 months after publication of the primary manuscript 36 months after publication.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified academic researchers and clinicians with a methodologically sound research proposal that aims to advance the field of endourology and stone disease management." What: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the published articles, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan (SAP), and data dictionary. How: Proposals should be submitted directly to the corresponding author (Prof. Iliya Saltirov, saltirov@vma.bg). All requests will be reviewed by the IAU Scientific Committee to ensure ethical standards and scientific validity. To gain access, requesters must sign a formal Data Access Agreement (DAA) to protect participant confidentiality and ensure data security.
De-identified individual participant data collected during the study, including data dictionaries, will be made available to researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the IAU Scientific Committee. This is intended for the purpose of further academic research and meta-analyses to improve patient care in endourology