NASVAL-SVT: Nasal Swab Versus Modified Valsalva for Supraventricular Tachycardia
NASVAL-SVT
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Nasal Swab and Modified Valsalva Maneuver for the Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia
Other study identifiers
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
May 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Brief Summary
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a common heart rhythm disorder seen in emergency departments, causing a rapid heartbeat (typically 150-250 beats per minute). The current best non-drug treatment, the modified Valsalva maneuver (mVM), successfully restores normal rhythm in about 43% of cases. When these maneuvers fail, intravenous adenosine is used, which, while effective, can cause brief but distressing side effects such as chest tightness, shortness of breath, and intense anxiety. During the COVID-19 pandemic, some patients briefly fainted during nasal swab collection. This happens because inserting a swab into the back of the nasal cavity (nasopharynx) stimulates the trigeminal nerve, which then activates the vagus nerve and slows the heart - a phenomenon called the trigeminocardiac (or nasocardiac) reflex. One published case report described a patient whose SVT was terminated within 10 seconds using a nasal swab. This study compares the nasal swab technique with the modified Valsalva maneuver in patients presenting to the emergency department with SVT. Patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. The primary outcome is whether a normal heart rhythm is restored within 1 minute of the procedure. Patient comfort and satisfaction are also measured. The study is conducted in two phases. The first (pilot) phase (30 patients per group) will assess whether the study can be successfully conducted and collect data to finalize the required sample size. The second (main) phase will use the pilot phase's actual data to determine the final number of participants needed.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
- Recruitment status
- recruiting
- Estimated enrollment
- 60 participants
- Study completion date
June 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
- Listed locations
- 1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Actual (reported)First Submitted
May 23, 2026
Actual (reported)First Posted
June 1, 2026
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
May 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
June 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
- Last Updated
- June 1, 2026
- Status Verified
- May 2026
- Last Update Submitted
- May 23, 2026