Evaluation of the Impact of Virtual Park on Training Motivation in Adult Patients
VP_Adults
Evaluation of the Impact of a Rehabilitation Intervention Based on Cycling With Virtual Park on Training Motivation in Adult Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and motivational impact of VirtualPark, a virtual reality-based dual-task rehabilitation system, in adults with neurological and age-related conditions. VirtualPark is a virtual reality application designed to deliver cognitive exercises during cycling training using a commercially available ergometer (THERA-Trainer Tigo). The system integrates physical and cognitive tasks in simulated real-life environments. The intervention integrates motor and cognitive training tasks targeting domains such as attention, inhibition, working memory, and navigation. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, cross-over pilot study. It will compare cycling training performed with and without virtual reality. Participants will complete both intervention conditions over a 4-week period separated by a wash-out phase with standard rehabilitation activities. The order of conditions will be randomized. The study will assess motivation during rehabilitation training, usability and user experience of the system, as well as exploratory effects on cognitive and motor performance, functional abilities, perceived exertion, and safety. The study will enroll adult participants (≥18 years) with conditions such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, mild cognitive impairment, spinal cord injury, and frail older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
May 29, 2026
May 1, 2026
6 months
May 15, 2026
May 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intrinsic Motivation
It is evaluated with the Interest/Enjoyment subscale of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). It is a part of a questionnaire, composed of 7 items to be answered on a 7-point Likert scale. For each statement, participants must provide a level of agreement on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 equals "strongly disagree" and 7 equals "strongly agree." . Total scores range from 7 to 49, with higher scores indicating greater intrinsic motivation and enjoyment during rehabilitation training.
Baseline, Week 2, Week 5
Motivation
the patient's motivational spectrum is assessed using the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS), a self-report questionnaire. It consists of 16 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale and investigates four factors: intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. For each statement, participants must provide a level of agreement on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 equals "strongly disagree" and 7 equals "strongly agree." . Total scores range from 4 to 28 on each subscale, with higher scores indicating greater presence of that type of motivation towards rehabilitation activity.
Baseline, Week 2, Week 5
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Usability
Week 2 or Week 5
user experience in relation to the adoption of the proposed technology
Week 2 or Week 5
Cognitive Function
Baseline, week 2, week 5, week 9
Cognitive Function
Baseline, Week 2, Week 5, Week 9
Cognitive Function
Baseline, Week 2, Week 5, Week 9
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Motor Function
Up to 5 weeks
Motor Funcion
Up to 5 weeks
Motor function
Up to 5 weeks
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cycling with Virtual Park
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform cycling training using a commercially available ergometer (THERA-Trainer Tigo) combined with the VirtualPark virtual reality system. The intervention includes simultaneous motor and cognitive training (dual-task), with cognitive exercises targeting attention, inhibition, working memory, and navigation during cycling.
Cycling withouth Virtual Park
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants perform standard cycling training using the ergometer (THERA-Trainer Tigo) without virtual reality. This represents conventional motor rehabilitation (supportive care) without the addition of cognitive tasks delivered through VirtualPark.
Interventions
Participants perform standard cycling training without virtual reality-based tasks
Participants perform cycling training using a commercially available ergometer combined with a non-immersive virtual reality system. Virtual Reality offers cognitive exercises targeting attention, inhibition, working memory, and navigation during cycling.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent to the study
- subjects \> 18 years and \<85 years
- diagnosis of MCI according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders VTh Edition (DSM V TR American Psychological Association 2013)
- detection of ischemic stroke within 6 months preceding the study, frail elderly subjects (Gobbens RJ et al. 2010)
- subjects affected by idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to the MDS-PD criteria (Postuma et al., 2015)
- subjects affected by possible, probable and definite ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria (Brooks Br, et al. 2000)
- subjects affected by MS according to the McDonald criteria (2017) with disability measured with the EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) \<= 8
- patients with spinal cord injury of different etiology with incomplete spinal cord injury, AIS (ASIA impairment scale) grade C and D, MMSE \>18
- subjects naïve to the use of the RV
- no ongoing behavioral disorders.
You may not qualify if:
- Other concomitant neurological pathologies in addition to the one under study
- presence of visual disturbances that do not allow access to the experimental virtual reality protocol
- presence of impaired cardiorespiratory function or other organic instabilities that contraindicate ergometer training
- severe osteoporosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Marta Mondellinilead
- Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Centercollaborator
- University of Pisacollaborator
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpAcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Istituti a Carattere Scientifico Maugeri Bari
Bari, Bari, 70124, Italy
Istituti a Carattere Scientifico Maugeri Telese
Telese Terme, Benevento, 82037, Italy
Centro di Riabilitazione Villa Beretta
Costa Masnaga, Lecco, 23845, Italy
Istituti a Carattere Scientifico Maugeri Milano Camaldoli
Milan, Milano, 20138, Italy
Istituti a Carattere Scientifico Maugeri Montescano
Montescano, Pavia, 27040, Italy
Istituti a Carattere Scientifico Maugeri Pavia
Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
Università di Pisa
Pisa, Pisa, 56126, Italy
Related Publications (29)
Xu X, Fu Z, Le W. Exercise and Parkinson's disease. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2019;147:45-74. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
PMID: 31607362BACKGROUNDYu J, Wu J, Lu J, Wei X, Zheng K, Liu B, Xiao W, Shi Q, Xiong L, Ren Z. Efficacy of virtual reality training on motor performance, activity of daily living, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: an umbrella review comprising meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Sep 30;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01256-y.
PMID: 37777748BACKGROUNDWang L, Zhang H, Ai H, Liu Y. Effects of virtual reality rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Oct 28;21(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01492-w.
PMID: 39468617BACKGROUNDTrevizan IL, Silva TD, Dawes H, Massetti T, Crocetta TB, Favero FM, Oliveira ASB, de Araujo LV, Santos ACC, de Abreu LC, Coe S, Monteiro CBM. Efficacy of different interaction devices using non-immersive virtual tasks in individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: a cross-sectional randomized trial. BMC Neurol. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1212-3.
PMID: 30558556BACKGROUNDTortora C, Di Crosta A, La Malva P, Prete G, Ceccato I, Mammarella N, Di Domenico A, Palumbo R. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2024 Jan;93:102146. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102146. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
PMID: 38036103BACKGROUNDSiciliano M, Chiorri C, Battini V, Sant'Elia V, Altieri M, Trojano L, Santangelo G. Regression-based normative data and equivalent scores for Trail Making Test (TMT): an updated Italian normative study. Neurol Sci. 2019 Mar;40(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3673-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
PMID: 30535956BACKGROUNDShah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.
PMID: 2760661BACKGROUNDPostuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, Obeso J, Marek K, Litvan I, Lang AE, Halliday G, Goetz CG, Gasser T, Dubois B, Chan P, Bloem BR, Adler CH, Deuschl G. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1591-601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424.
PMID: 26474316BACKGROUNDPoli L, Greco G, Gabriele M, Pepe I, Centrone C, Cataldi S, Fischetti F. Effect of Outdoor Cycling, Virtual and Enhanced Reality Indoor Cycling on Heart Rate, Motivation, Enjoyment and Intention to Perform Green Exercise in Healthy Adults. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Oct 2;9(4):183. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040183.
PMID: 39449477BACKGROUNDPelosin E, Ponte C, Putzolu M, Lagravinese G, Hausdorff JM, Nieuwboer A, Ginis P, Rochester L, Alcock L, Bloem BR, Nieuwhof F, Cereatti A, Della Croce U, Mirelman A, Avanzino L. Motor-Cognitive Treadmill Training With Virtual Reality in Parkinson's Disease: The Effect of Training Duration. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;13:753381. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.753381. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 35069171BACKGROUNDPedroli E, Greci L, Colombo D, Serino S, Cipresso P, Arlati S, Mondellini M, Boilini L, Giussani V, Goulene K, Agostoni M, Sacco M, Stramba-Badiale M, Riva G, Gaggioli A. Characteristics, Usability, and Users Experience of a System Combining Cognitive and Physical Therapy in a Virtual Environment: Positive Bike. Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 19;18(7):2343. doi: 10.3390/s18072343.
PMID: 30029502BACKGROUNDPapaioannou T, Voinescu A, Petrini K, Stanton Fraser D. Efficacy and Moderators of Virtual Reality for Cognitive Training in People with Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;88(4):1341-1370. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210672.
PMID: 35811514BACKGROUNDAiello EN, Esposito A, Gramegna C, Gazzaniga V, Zago S, Difonzo T, Appollonio IM, Bolognini N. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and its sub-scales: validation and updated normative data in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):979-984. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05392-y. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
PMID: 34184168BACKGROUNDOhura T, Hase K, Nakajima Y, Nakayama T. Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2.
PMID: 28841846BACKGROUNDNuzum H, Stickel A, Corona M, Zeller M, Melrose RJ, Wilkins SS. Potential Benefits of Physical Activity in MCI and Dementia. Behav Neurol. 2020 Feb 12;2020:7807856. doi: 10.1155/2020/7807856. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32104516BACKGROUNDMrakic-Sposta S, Di Santo SG, Franchini F, Arlati S, Zangiacomi A, Greci L, Moretti S, Jesuthasan N, Marzorati M, Rizzo G, Sacco M, Vezzoli A. Effects of Combined Physical and Cognitive Virtual Reality-Based Training on Cognitive Impairment and Oxidative Stress in MCI Patients: A Pilot Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Oct 1;10:282. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00282. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30327596BACKGROUNDMonaco M, Costa A, Caltagirone C, Carlesimo GA. Forward and backward span for verbal and visuo-spatial data: standardization and normative data from an Italian adult population. Neurol Sci. 2013 May;34(5):749-54. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1130-x. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
PMID: 22689311BACKGROUNDMeng L, Li X, Li C, Tsang RCC, Chen Y, Ge Y, Gao Q. Effects of Exercise in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;99(9):801-810. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001419.
PMID: 32452880BACKGROUNDMcDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032.
PMID: 11456302BACKGROUNDMcAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Mar;60(1):48-58. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413.
PMID: 2489825BACKGROUNDHan P, Zhang W, Kang L, Ma Y, Fu L, Jia L, Yu H, Chen X, Hou L, Wang L, Yu X, Kohzuki M, Guo Q. Clinical Evidence of Exercise Benefits for Stroke. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1000:131-151. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4304-8_9.
PMID: 29098620BACKGROUNDGobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. In search of an integral conceptual definition of frailty: opinions of experts. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.09.015. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
PMID: 20511101BACKGROUNDGalperin I, Mirelman A, Schmitz-Hubsch T, Hsieh KL, Regev K, Karni A, Brozgol M, Cornejo Thumm P, Lynch SG, Paul F, Devos H, Sosnoff J, Hausdorff JM. Treadmill training with virtual reality to enhance gait and cognitive function among people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. 2023 Mar;270(3):1388-1401. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11469-1. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
PMID: 36357586BACKGROUNDFundaro C, Casale R, Maestri R, Traversoni S, Colombo R, Salvini S, Ferretti C, Bartolo M, Buonocore M, Giardini A. Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q): development and implementation of an instrument to evaluate patients' perception during training. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Mar 24;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01146-3.
PMID: 36964543BACKGROUNDFernandez-Vazquez D, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Navarro-Lopez V. Haptic Glove Systems in Combination with Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality for Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 20;19(16):10378. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610378.
PMID: 36012019BACKGROUNDDubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621.
PMID: 11113214BACKGROUNDColombo V, Mondellini M, Fumagalli A, Aliverti A, Sacco M. A virtual reality-based endurance training program for COPD patients: acceptability and user experience. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 May;19(4):1590-1599. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2219699. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
PMID: 37272556BACKGROUNDBrooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL; World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000 Dec;1(5):293-9. doi: 10.1080/146608200300079536. No abstract available.
PMID: 11464847BACKGROUNDBorg G. Ratings of perceived exertion and heart rates during short-term cycle exercise and their use in a new cycling strength test. Int J Sports Med. 1982 Aug;3(3):153-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026080.
PMID: 7129724BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marta Mondellini, Psychologist
Istituto di Sistemi e Tecnologie Industriali Intelligenti per il Manifatturiero Avanzato
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cira Fundarò, MD
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Montescano
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Lunetta, MD
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Milano Camaldoli
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefania De Trane, MD
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Bari
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Marcuccio, MD
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Telese
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chiara Pavese, MD
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Pavia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Franco Molteni, MD
Centro di Riabilitazione Villa Beretta
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carmelo Chisari, MD
University of Pisa
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2026
First Posted
May 29, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to data protection and privacy constraints, and in accordance with applicable GDPR regulations and institutional policies.