PMCF Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of METROSAN Spinal Systems and BONEGRAFT Filling Materials
INFO SPINE
A Prospective, Multi-Center, Observational Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of METROSAN Spinal Systems and BONEGRAFT Filling Materials Used in Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Surgery
2 other identifiers
observational
561
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, observational Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) study designed to collect additional safety and clinical performance data on CE-marked Titania® spinal instrumentation and fusion systems, and Bonegraft® bone filling materials (synthetic bone grafts and bone cements). The study aims to evaluate short-term (12-month) safety and effectiveness, identify previously unknown side effects, monitor defined complications, and assess risks based on real-world evidence in patients undergoing spinal surgery. All investigated products are used within their intended purpose under routine clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 26, 2028
May 29, 2026
May 1, 2026
2 years
May 18, 2026
May 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score from baseline (for Cervical Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
The NDI is used to evaluate neck-pain-related disability. It consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5. While the total raw score ranges from 0 to 50, results are expressed as a percentage (0-100%) for clinical evaluation, consistent with the referenced literature (Heller et al., 2009). Following clinical benchmarks, a reduction of ≥15% in the NDI score at the 12th-month follow-up compared to baseline is defined as a successful clinical improvement.
[12 months]
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline (for Thoracolumbar Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
The ODI is used to assess the impact of thoracolumbar pain on daily life activities (personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sexual life, social life, and travel). It consists of 10 items, each scored from 0 to 5. The total score is calculated using the formula: (total score x 100) / (5 x number of questions answered), resulting in a scale from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Evaluations will be performed at baseline (pre-op) and at each follow-up visit (Day 12, Week 6, and Months 3, 6, and 12). A reduction of ≥15 points in the ODI score at the 12th-month follow-up compared to baseline is defined as a successful clinical improvement.
[12 months]
Fusion rate for Spinal Fusion Systems
Fusion status will be evaluated using radiographs and/or CT scans (if available) at each postoperative follow-up visit. The assessment is based on the presence of a continuous trabecular bone bridge between the vertebral bodies. Fusion will be categorized into three groups: Solid Fusion: Presence of a continuous bone bridge between the vertebrae. Fibrous Fusion: Absence of a continuous bone bridge, but no signs of instability (translation \< 3 mm on dynamic radiographs). Non-fusion: Absence of a continuous bone bridge along with abnormal motion (\> 3 mm translation on radiographs). The evaluation will be concluded once solid fusion is achieved.
[12 months]
Adjacent segment motion in subjects with dynamic instrumentation
In subjects undergoing dynamic posterior stabilization, motion at the adjacent segments will be evaluated using flexion and extension radiographs (if available) at all follow-up visits. The primary assessment involves measuring the differences in the disc space angles. These measurements will be compared with baseline (preoperative) values to monitor changes in adjacent segment mobility over the 12-month follow-up period.
[12 months]
Change in Intervertebral Disc Height
The intervertebral disc height will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the Dabbs method. The assessment is based on the average of the measurements taken from the anterior and posterior regions of the disc space, expressed in millimeters (mm) by the formula (A+B)/2. These radiological measurements will be compared with preoperative (baseline) values to identify any changes in disc height throughout the 12-month follow-up period.
[12 months]
Assessment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Intervertebral disc degeneration will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the Pfirrmann Classification system. This system grades the degree of disc degeneration based on MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) findings, focusing on disc structure, distinction between nucleus and annulus, signal intensity, and disc height. The scale ranges from Grade I (normal disc structure with high signal intensity) to Grade V (severe degeneration with collapsed disc space). Categorical grades obtained at each control period will be compared with baseline (preoperative) status to monitor the progression or stabilization of disc degeneration throughout the 12-month follow-up period, where a shift toward higher grades signifies worsening of degeneration.
12 months
Cervical and segmental lordosis assessment (for Cervical Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
Cervical and segmental lordosis will be evaluated at each follow-up visit and compared with preoperative measurements. Lateral radiographs of the cervical spine will be used to measure lordosis angles using the Cobb angle method. This assessment aims to monitor the maintenance or restoration of the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and the specific treated segments throughout the 12-month follow-up period.
[12 months]
Lordosis restoration and sagittal balance assessment (for Thoracolumbar Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion Systems)
Sagittal balance and lordosis restoration will be evaluated using full-spine radiographs (tele-radiographies, if available) at baseline and each follow-up visit (Day 12, Week 6, Months 3, 6, and 12). Clinical success will be assessed based on the Schwab sagittal alignment classification parameters. This assessment is a categorical evaluation based on whether patients achieve the predefined optimal correction thresholds for three key spinal parameters: 1) Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA) \< 50 millimeters, 2) Pelvic Tilt (PT) \< 20 degrees, and 3) Pelvic Incidence minus Lumbar Lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch within ±9 degrees. At each follow-up period, patients will be categorized into two groups: those who achieve all these optimal parameters and those who do not. Patients meeting all three thresholds will be classified as 'successful' according to the Schwab criteria.
[12 months]
Incidence of adverse events and complications
Safety data will be collected by recording all adverse events (AEs) and complications encountered during the 12-month follow-up period. This includes intraoperative complications, device-related failures, and any postoperative adverse events (e.g., infection, neurological deficit, or reoperation).
[12 months]
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical outcome assessment using Odom's Criteria
[12 months]
Assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
[12 months]
Assessment of health-related quality of life with SF-12
[12 months]
Patient satisfaction assessment
[12 months]
Study Arms (17)
Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)" will be followed for 12 months.
Posterior Cervical Stabilization Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Posterior Cervical Stabilization Systems" will be followed for 12 months.
Cervical Plate Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Plate System" will be followed for 12 months.
Cervical Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)" will be followed for 12 months.
Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
Cervical Disc Prosthesis (PEEK)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Cervical Disc Prosthesis (PEEK)" will be followed for 12 months.
Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages (PEEK)" will be followed for 12 months.
Interspinous Fusion Device (Titanium)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Interspinous Fusion Device (Titanium)" will be followed for 12 months.
Posterior Thoracolumbar Stabilization Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Posterior Thoracolumbar Stabilization Systems" will be followed for 12 months.
Posterior Thoracolumbar Clamp Systems
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Posterior Thoracolumbar Clamp Systems" will be followed for 12 months.
Thoracolumbar Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Titania® Thoracolumbar Dynamic Stabilization Systems (Elastic Rod)" will be followed for 12 months.
Synthetic Bone Grafts (Cervical Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Grafts" will be followed for 12 months. The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., NDI scores) in the cervical region.
Synthetic Bone Grafts (Thoracolumbar Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Grafts" will be followed for 12 months. The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., ODI scores) in the thoracolumbar region.
Bone Cement (Cervical Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Cement" will be followed for 12 months. The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., ODI scores) in the cervical region.
Bone Cement (Thoracolumbar Application)
Subjects undergoing surgery with "Bonegraft® Synthetic Bone Cement" will be followed for 12 months. The product is evaluated within this group specifically for its application and clinical outcomes (e.g., ODI scores) in the thoracolumbar region.
Interventions
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
This is a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) of the CE-marked device used according to its intended purpose within routine clinical practice. As this is an observational study, the device is selected and applied based on the physician's clinical judgment, and no additional interventions or procedures beyond standard care are performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent cervical or thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation and/or fusion surgery under current medical practice with appropriate indications, in whom at least one of the investigational devices was used, and who meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria. The study will enroll a total of 561 subjects across 17 product groups (33 subjects per group, accounting for a 10% dropout rate) at 3 centers in Turkey. All patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty using Tıpmed™ Primary Hip Prosthesis Systems, who were informed about this study and voluntarily agreed to participate will be included.
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older.
- Skeletally mature.
- Male or female.
- Undergone spinal surgery (cervical or thoracolumbar) for any indication under current medical practice.
- Titania® spinal stabilization/fusion systems and/or BONEGRAFT® bone cements or BONEGRAFT® bone graft materials used during the operation.
- No general health condition contraindicating surgery.
- No legal restriction (military service, incarceration, or equivalent).
- Provision of signed and dated Informed Consent Form (ICF)
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in another interventional clinical investigation
- Suspected or confirmed pregnancy
- Morbid obesity
- Neurological or psychiatric conditions preventing compliance with postoperative care and instructions
- Active spinal or systemic infection
- High fever or leukocytosis
- Severe osteoporosis and/or disease affecting bone metabolism
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to PEEK, Titanium, or PMMA
- Congenital abnormality, tumor, or other condition preventing secure implant fixation or likely to shorten implant useful life
- Inadequate tissue coverage at the operative site
- Legally restricted individuals (military personnel, prisoners, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery
Izmir, 35150, Turkey (Türkiye)
Demokrasi University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery
Izmir, 35390, Turkey (Türkiye)
Van Yuzuncu Yil University Dursun Odabas Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery
Van, 65000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hasan Kamil Sucu, Professor
Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2026
First Posted
May 29, 2026
Study Start
April 27, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 26, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 26, 2028
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will not be shared due to confidentiality and intellectual property policies of the sponsor.