Effects of a 6-Month Gymnastics Program on Somatotype and Motor Performance in Children Across Age Groups
Motor Progress
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study adopted a controlled 6-month study design to compare the gymnastics group (n= 56) with the inactive control group (n=88). Anthropometric profiling, somatotype assessment, and motor performance tests were conducted pre- and post-intervention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedMay 29, 2026
January 1, 2025
5 months
May 5, 2026
May 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Circumferences (Girths) Measurements
Girth measurements were taken to the nearest 0.1 cm using a flexible, non-stretchable anthropometric tape measure (Lufkin W606PM, Apex Tool Group). The measured girths included the head, neck, shoulder, chest, waist, hip, relaxed arm, forearm, thigh, maximum calf, and ankle circumferences. Care was taken to ensure the tape measure was at a right angle to the long axis of the body segment and did not compress the subcutaneous tissue.
6 month
Skinfold Thickness Measurements
Skinfold thicknesses were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using a Harpenden skinfold caliper (Baty International, West Sussex, UK). Measurements were taken in duplicate at nine standardized sites: triceps, subscapular, biceps, chest, axillary, abdominal, suprailiac, anterior thigh, and medial calf. If the difference between the first two measurements exceeded 5%, a third measurement was taken, and the median value was recorded for analysis. Furthermore, to obtain a comprehensive and robust quantification of total subcutaneous adiposity, the sum of all nine measured skinfolds (Σ9SF) was calculated. In pediatric kinanthropometry, the absolute sum of multiple skinfold sites is widely recognized as a highly reliable proxy for total body fatness, as it circumvents the inherent biological maturation errors and prediction biases associated with population-specific body density and body fat percentage equations.
6 month
Waist-to-Height Ratio
Calculated by dividing waist circumference (cm) by standing height (cm). This ratio serves as a highly validated, age-independent proxy for central adiposity and health risk in pediatric populations.
Six Month
Segment Lengths and Bone Breadths Measurements
Segment lengths (arm span, total arm, forearm, total leg, thigh, tibia, and foot lengths) were measured using a segmometer and anthropometric tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. Skeletal breadths were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a sliding spreading caliper. The breadth measurements included the shoulder, biacromial, biiliac, bitrochanteric, knee (biepicondylar femur), elbow (biepicondylar humerus), and wrist.
Six Month
Body Fat (BF) and Fat-Free Mass
Relative body fat percentage (BF%) was estimated using the pediatric-specific skinfold equations developed by Slaughter et al. Specifically, this calculation utilized the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses, adjusted for biological sex and maturation, which is considered the gold standard for clinical field assessments in youth. Subsequently, total body fat mass was determined, and absolute Fat-Free Mass (FFM in kg) was calculated by subtracting this estimated fat mass from the total body mass.
six month
Skeletal Muscle Mass
Total skeletal muscle mass (kg) was estimated by employing validated anthropometric prediction models for children and adolescents, which account for standing height as well as corrected limb girths (i.e., thigh, calf, and arm circumferences that have been corrected for their respective overlying subcutaneous adipose tissue thicknesses).
six month
Arm Muscle Area
AMA was calculated to estimate regional upper-body muscularity and protein reserves. AMA (cm²) was derived from relaxed arm girth (cm) and triceps skinfold thickness (cm) using the standard anthropometric equation
six month
Somatotype
The anthropometric somatotype components, namely endomorphy, mesomorphy, and ectomorphy, were calculated according to the Heath-Carter method \[17, 24\]. Endomorphy was estimated based on the height-adjusted sum of three skinfold thicknesses: triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac.
six month
Motor Performance Tests
Flexibility (Sit and Reach Test): Lower-Body Explosive Power: Muscular Endurance: Speed (20-m Sprint):
six month
Body Composition
Endomorphy was estimated based on the height-adjusted sum of three skinfold thicknesses: triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac. Mesomorphy was determined using humerus (elbow) breadth, femur (knee) breadth, height, and corrected limb girths. Corrected arm girth (CAG) and corrected calf girth (CCG) were adjusted for the corresponding skinfold thicknesses. Ectomorphy was derived from the Height-Weight Ratio (HWR), which was calculated as height divided by the cube root of body mass.
6 months
Weight
Participants were assessed barefoot and wearing minimal clothing. Participants' body weight was measured using a Seca (Seca GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) scale with an accuracy of 0.1 kg.
6 Month
Height
Participants' height was measured using a Seca (Seca GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) stadiometer with an accuracy of 0.1 cm.
6 month
Body Mass Index
Participants' body mass indices (BMI) were calculated using the weight/height² formula (kg/m² ).
6 month
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group
EXPERIMENTALControl Group
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- For Experimental Group: Active and continuous participation in a gymnastics program during the entire 6-month period.
- Inactive control group : comprised participants who did not practice any form of sports, athletics, and physical training outside their usual physical education classes at school.
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of any chronic metabolic, cardiovascular, and endocrine disorders;
- a history of severe musculoskeletal injuries and orthopedic surgeries within the past year;
- the use of medications known to have a significant impact on body composition and physical performance; and
- an attendance rate of less than 85% for the gymnastics sessions (only for the intervention group).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kazakh National University of Sports
Astana, Kazakhstan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
May 29, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share