Multimodal Imaging and Digital Pathology for Prostate Cancer Prediction
A Multicenter Study of a Deep Learning Model Based on Spatial Registration of Multimodal Imaging and Digital Pathology for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
3,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a multicenter observational study. A deep learning model integrated with multimodal imaging and digital pathology spatial registration is built based on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound and postoperative digital pathological whole slide images. The study is designed to achieve accurate prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer and non-invasive risk stratification. Unnecessary prostate biopsy and overdiagnosis can be reduced to support the optimization of clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2025
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2030
May 29, 2026
May 1, 2026
5.1 years
May 13, 2026
May 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)
The diagnostic performance of the multimodal deep learning model in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer using preoperative imaging data from this prospective and retrospective multicenter cohort. The AUC will be calculated to evaluate the model's discriminative ability.
Baseline (at the time of imaging/pathology data collection)
Interventions
This is an observational study. No new treatment, drug, device, or procedure is being administered to participants. Only standard-of-care clinical data, imaging, and pathology records are collected and analyzed.
Eligibility Criteria
This is a prospective and retrospective multicenter cohort study. The study population consists of consecutive male subjects aged 40-90 years who are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy, with complete standard-of-care preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images, and corresponding pathological diagnosis results. The collected data include: 1. Preoperative mpMRI and TRUS images 2. Digital whole-slide images of prostate biopsy specimens 3. Digital whole-slide images of radical prostatectomy specimens (if performed) The prospective cohort will include newly enrolled subjects who provide written informed consent, while the retrospective cohort will include historical subjects with complete imaging, pathology slide, and clinical data from participating centers.
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy.
- Subjects who have completed standard-of-care preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) examinations.
- Subjects with complete pathological diagnosis results available.
- Age between 40 and 90 years.
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent (for prospective cohort participants only).
You may not qualify if:
- Prior history of pelvic radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy.
- Incomplete or poor-quality mpMRI or TRUS images (e.g., motion artifacts, insufficient sequences).
- Concurrent other primary malignant tumors.
- Severe systemic diseases that may affect the evaluation of the prostate.
- Subjects with incomplete clinical or pathological data.
- Contraindications to MRI examination (e.g., incompatible metallic implants, severe claustrophobia).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Liuzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
Liuzhou, Guangxi, 545006, China
Related Publications (13)
Shao L, Liang C, Yan Y, Zhu H, Jiang X, Bao M, Zang P, Huang X, Zhou H, Nie P, Wang L, Li J, Zhang S, Ren S. An MRI-pathology foundation model for noninvasive diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer. Nat Cancer. 2025 Oct;6(10):1621-1637. doi: 10.1038/s43018-025-01041-x. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
PMID: 40897909RESULTRusu M, Jahanandish H, Vesal S, Li CX, Bhattacharya I, Venkataraman R, Zhou SR, Kornberg Z, Sommer ER, Khandwala YS, Hockman L, Zhou Z, Choi MH, Ghanouni P, Fan RE, Sonn GA. ProCUSNet: Prostate Cancer Detection on B-mode Transrectal Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence for Targeting During Prostate Biopsies. Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Apr;8(2):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.012. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
PMID: 39880746RESULTSaha A, Hosseinzadeh M, Huisman H. End-to-end prostate cancer detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction. Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102155. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102155. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
PMID: 34245943RESULTLee YJ, Moon HW, Choi MH, Eun Jung S, Park YH, Lee JY, Kim DH, Eun Rha S, Kim SH, Lee KW, Choi YJ, Lee YS, Lee W, Lee S, Grimm R, von Busch H, Han D, Lou B, Kamen A. MRI-based Deep Learning Algorithm for Assisting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection: A Bicenter Prospective Study. Radiology. 2025 Mar;314(3):e232788. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232788.
PMID: 40067105RESULTTwilt JJ, Saha A, Bosma JS, Padhani AR, Bonekamp D, Giannarini G, van den Bergh R, Kasivisvanathan V, Obuchowski N, Yakar D, Elschot M, Veltman J, Futterer J, Huisman H, de Rooij M; PI-CAI Consortium. AI-Assisted vs Unassisted Identification of Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Images. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15672.
PMID: 40512493RESULTGoel S, Shoag JE, Gross MD, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Robinson B, Khani F, Baltich Nelson B, Margolis DJ, Hu JC. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
PMID: 31492650RESULTPham THN, Schulze-Hagen MF, Rahnama'i MS. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;7(2):e1962. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1962. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
PMID: 38217298RESULTDrost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
PMID: 31022301RESULTMoliere S, Hamzaoui D, Ploussard G, Mathieu R, Fiard G, Baboudjian M, Granger B, Roupret M, Delingette H, Renard-Penna R. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Aug;8(4):1182-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.11.001. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
PMID: 39547898RESULTEpstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820.
PMID: 28177964RESULTZeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji JS, Zou X, Xia C, Sun K, Yang Z, Li H, Wang N, Han R, Liu S, Li H, Mu H, He Y, Xu Y, Fu Z, Zhou Y, Jiang J, Yang Y, Chen J, Wei K, Fan D, Wang J, Fu F, Zhao D, Song G, Chen J, Jiang C, Zhou X, Gu X, Jin F, Li Q, Li Y, Wu T, Yan C, Dong J, Hua Z, Baade P, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003-15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 May;6(5):e555-e567. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X.
PMID: 29653628RESULTSchafer EJ, Laversanne M, Sung H, Soerjomataram I, Briganti A, Dahut W, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Patterns and Trends in Global Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: An Update. Eur Urol. 2025 Mar;87(3):302-313. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
PMID: 39668103RESULTBray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
PMID: 38572751RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fubo Wang, MD
Guangxi Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 12 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Doctoral Tutor of Medical Science
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2026
First Posted
May 29, 2026
Study Start
May 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2030
Last Updated
May 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This study does not have a plan to share individual participant data due to institutional and ethical restrictions.