Effect of Manual and Mechanical Glide Path Preparation on Working Length Accuracy.
Comparison of Working Length Accuracy Following Manual and Mechanical Glide Path Preparation: An In Vitro Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Accurate working length determination is essential for successful root canal treatment and is influenced by proper glide path preparation. This in vitro study aims to compare the accuracy of working length achievement following manual and mechanical glide path preparation techniques. Sixty extracted single-rooted permanent teeth will be randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1 will undergo manual glide path preparation using stainless steel K-files, while Group 2 will receive mechanical glide path preparation using rotary PathFile instruments. Initial and final working lengths will be measured using an electronic apex locator and confirmed with digital radiographs. The difference between the initial and final working lengths will be analyzed statistically. The results of this study will help identify the more effective glide path preparation technique for maintaining working length accuracy and improving endodontic treatment outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 10, 2026
July 28, 2026
July 1, 2026
6 days
May 21, 2026
July 25, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of working length achievement in mm
The primary outcome of this study will be the accuracy of working length achievement after glide path preparation using manual and mechanical techniques. It will be assessed by measuring the difference between the initial working length (recorded before instrumentation) and the final working length (recorded after glide path preparation and canal shaping) in millimeters. Working length measurements will be obtained using an apex locator and confirmed with digital periapical radiographs. A smaller difference between the initial and final working lengths will indicate better maintenance and achievement of the accurate working length.
Six months
Study Arms (2)
Manual Glide Path Preparation
EXPERIMENTALTeeth in this arm will undergo glide path preparation using manual stainless steel K-files (size #10) with a watch-winding motion and gentle vertical filing to establish a smooth glide path up to the predetermined working length.
Mechanical Glide Path Preparation
ACTIVE COMPARATORTeeth in this arm will undergo glide path preparation using rotary PathFile instruments (#13 and #16) with an engine-driven handpiece, following the manufacturer's instructions to establish the glide path up to the predetermined working length.
Interventions
Glide path is created using stainless steel K-files (size #10) with a watch-winding motion and gentle vertical filing to establish a smooth path from the canal orifice to the apex.
Glide path is created using rotary PathFile instruments (#13 and #16) with an engine-driven handpiece, following manufacturer instructions to establish a smooth path from the canal orifice to the apex.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Extracted permanent single-rooted teeth. Teeth with fully formed mature apices. Teeth with intact roots and no structural defects. Root canals with curvature less than 15 degrees. Teeth with patent canals allowing negotiation with a size #10 K-file.
You may not qualify if:
- Teeth with caries, fractures, cracks, or root defects. Teeth with previous endodontic treatment. Teeth showing root resorption or calcified canals. Teeth with unusual root canal anatomy or multiple canals. Teeth with severe canal curvature greater than 15 degrees. Teeth with immature apices or open apices.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aleena Malik, BDS
Pakistan
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alina Malik
School Of Dentistry,Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University,Islamabad
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Comparison of Working Length Accuracy Following Manual and Mechanical Glide Path Preparation: An In Vitro Study.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2026
First Posted
May 28, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
October 4, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 10, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 10, 2026
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share