Brain-controlled Spinal Cord Stimulation in Participants With Chronic Stroke for Lower and Upper Limb Rehabilitation
Stroke-BSI
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the preliminary safety and effectiveness of using a cortical recording device (ECoG) combined with cervical and lumbar targeted epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord to restore voluntary motor functions of upper and lower limbs in participants with chronic stroke suffering from mobility impairment. The goal is to establish a direct bridge between the motor intention of the participant and the spinal cord, which should not only improve or restore voluntary control of arm and leg movement and support immediate mobility, but also promote neurological recovery when combined with neurorehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Sep 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2032
June 8, 2026
June 1, 2026
2.1 years
April 15, 2026
June 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Preliminary safety
Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Adverse Events (AE) that are deemed related or possibly related to the procedure or to the ARC-BSI Stroke System.
From enrollment until End of the Study timepoint (at 5 years)
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremities
Pre-implantation: Baseline (B) Post-implantation (counting from first surgery) :6-Months measures (M6), 1-Year Measures (Y1), then Yearly Measures until 5 years (Y2, Y3, Y4 and Y5). All the timepoint Measures last 1 to 2 weeks.
10 Meters Walk Test (10MWT)
Pre-implantation: Baseline (B) Post-implantation (counting from first surgery) :6-Months measures (M6), 1-Year Measures (Y1), then Yearly Measures until 5 years (Y2, Y3, Y4 and Y5). All the timepoint Measures last 1 to 2 weeks.
6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT):
Pre-implantation: Baseline (B) Post-implantation (counting from first surgery) :6-Months measures (M6), 1-Year Measures (Y1), then Yearly Measures until 5 years (Y2, Y3, Y4 and Y5). All the timepoint Measures last 1 to 2 weeks.
Timed Up and Go (TUG):
Pre-implantation: Baseline (B) Post-implantation (counting from first surgery) :6-Months measures (M6), 1-Year Measures (Y1), then Yearly Measures until 5 years (Y2, Y3, Y4 and Y5). All the timepoint Measures last 1 to 2 weeks.
EMG-based Gait Analysis
Baseline, 6-Months measures, 1-Year Measures, then Yearly Measures until 5 years.
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL)
Baseline; monthly for up to 1 year during the Main Study phase; and every 3 months for up to 5 years during the Optional Study Extension phase
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale (PIADS)
Monthly for up to 1 year during the Main Study phase; and every 3 months for up to 5 years during the Optional Study Extension phase
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Baseline; monthly for up to 1 year during the Main Study phase; and every 3 months for up to 5 years during the Optional Study Extension phase
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
All participants
EXPERIMENTALAll participants receive the same intervention.
Interventions
Implantation of a 64 channel - ECoG array over the sensory motor cortex of one side's upper and lower limbs, combined with an implantation of two 16 channel spinal cord stimulation system, one over the cervical region and one over the lumbar region. The decoded motor intentions are driving the implanted spinal cord stimulation system. Brain-controlled spinal cord stimulation is used for training and rehabilitation to recover voluntary movements.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be between 18-70 years old at the time of enrolment.
- Must have suffered from a subcortical including brain stem stroke that occurred at least 9 months but not more than 10 years prior to enrolment.
- Must have a score lower than 25 on the Fugl-Meyer upper-limb scale.
- Must be able to stand with or without assistive device for 30 seconds.
- Must have a score higher than 22 at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
- Must present right or left hemiplegia.
- Must have completed primary standard of care rehabilitation.
- Must provide and sign the study's Informed Consent prior to any study-related procedures.
- Must be able to understand and interact with the study team in French or English.
- Must agree to comply in good faith with all conditions of the study and to attend all scheduled appointments.
- Must use effective contraception for women of childbearing capacity.
- Must be able to withhold antiplatelet/anticoagulation agents perioperatively for the time of the surgeries (if applicable).
You may not qualify if:
- Must not be pregnant or breast feeding (if applicable).
- Must not have the intention to become pregnant during the study (if applicable).
- Must not have any diseases and conditions that would increase the morbidity and mortality of the implantation surgery.
- Must not have any mental instability, including a diagnosis of personality disorder, psychosis, substance abuse, or severe depression as assessed by the psychologist.
- Must not have any other medical conditions that would make the subject unable to participate in testing in the judgment of the investigators (e.g., major cognitive disorder, renal failure, hepatic dysfunction, epilepsy, etc.).
- Must not have ongoing significant dysphagia or aspiration difficulties or require ventilator support.
- Must not have any active implanted device, such as a pacemaker or other neurostimulator.
- Must not have any spinal anatomical abnormalities or incompatibilities with the implanted system precluding surgery.
- Must not have severe spasticity of the upper limb or lower limb (Modified Ashworth Scale \> 3).
- Must not have indication requiring frequent MRIs.
- Must not participate in another clinical study using drugs or medical devices that might interfere with the outcomes of the study.
- Must not be the investigator him/herself, his/her family members, employees, and other dependent persons.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1005, Switzerland
Related Publications (14)
Ajiboye AB, Willett FR, Young DR, Memberg WD, Murphy BA, Miller JP, Walter BL, Sweet JA, Hoyen HA, Keith MW, Peckham PH, Simeral JD, Donoghue JP, Hochberg LR, Kirsch RF. Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1821-1830. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30601-3. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
PMID: 28363483BACKGROUNDHochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, Masse NY, Simeral JD, Vogel J, Haddadin S, Liu J, Cash SS, van der Smagt P, Donoghue JP. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012 May 16;485(7398):372-5. doi: 10.1038/nature11076.
PMID: 22596161BACKGROUNDJovanovic LI, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Rademeyer HJ, Alavinia M, McGillivray C, Kalsi-Ryan S, Popovic MR, Marquez-Chin C. Brain-computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy for rehabilitation of reaching and grasping after spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021 Mar 19;7(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00380-4.
PMID: 33741900BACKGROUNDSchirmer CM, Shils JL, Arle JE, Cosgrove GR, Dempsey PK, Tarlov E, Kim S, Martin CJ, Feltz C, Moul M, Magge S. Heuristic map of myotomal innervation in humans using direct intraoperative nerve root stimulation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jul;15(1):64-70. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.SPINE1068. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
PMID: 21476796BACKGROUNDUchiyama S, Ishizuka N, Shimada K, Teramoto T, Yamazaki T, Oikawa S, Sugawara M, Ando K, Murata M, Yokoyama K, Minematsu K, Matsumoto M, Ikeda Y; JPPP Study Group. Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Elderly Patients With Vascular Risk Factors: Japanese Primary Prevention Project. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):1605-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012461. Epub 2016 May 10.
PMID: 27165949BACKGROUNDPuentes S, Kaido T, Hanakawa T, Ichinohe N, Otsuki T, Seki K. Internal capsule stroke in the common marmoset. Neuroscience. 2015 Jan 22;284:400-411. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
PMID: 25453768BACKGROUNDKato K, Sawada M, Nishimura Y. Bypassing stroke-damaged neural pathways via a neural interface induces targeted cortical adaptation. Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 16;10(1):4699. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12647-y.
PMID: 31619680BACKGROUNDLorach H, Galvez A, Spagnolo V, Martel F, Karakas S, Intering N, Vat M, Faivre O, Harte C, Komi S, Ravier J, Collin T, Coquoz L, Sakr I, Baaklini E, Hernandez-Charpak SD, Dumont G, Buschman R, Buse N, Denison T, van Nes I, Asboth L, Watrin A, Struber L, Sauter-Starace F, Langar L, Auboiroux V, Carda S, Chabardes S, Aksenova T, Demesmaeker R, Charvet G, Bloch J, Courtine G. Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface. Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7963):126-133. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5. Epub 2023 May 24.
PMID: 37225984BACKGROUNDBenabid AL, Costecalde T, Eliseyev A, Charvet G, Verney A, Karakas S, Foerster M, Lambert A, Moriniere B, Abroug N, Schaeffer MC, Moly A, Sauter-Starace F, Ratel D, Moro C, Torres-Martinez N, Langar L, Oddoux M, Polosan M, Pezzani S, Auboiroux V, Aksenova T, Mestais C, Chabardes S. An exoskeleton controlled by an epidural wireless brain-machine interface in a tetraplegic patient: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Dec;18(12):1112-1122. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30321-7. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
PMID: 31587955BACKGROUNDSelfslagh A, Shokur S, Campos DSF, Donati ARC, Almeida S, Yamauti SY, Coelho DB, Bouri M, Nicolelis MAL. Non-invasive, Brain-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Locomotion Rehabilitation in Individuals with Paraplegia. Sci Rep. 2019 May 1;9(1):6782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43041-9.
PMID: 31043637BACKGROUNDBiasiucci A, Leeb R, Iturrate I, Perdikis S, Al-Khodairy A, Corbet T, Schnider A, Schmidlin T, Zhang H, Bassolino M, Viceic D, Vuadens P, Guggisberg AG, Millan JDR. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 20;9(1):2421. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z.
PMID: 29925890BACKGROUNDKathe C, Skinnider MA, Hutson TH, Regazzi N, Gautier M, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Ceto S, James ND, Cho N, Baud L, Galan K, Matson KJE, Rowald A, Kim K, Wang R, Minassian K, Prior JO, Asboth L, Barraud Q, Lacour SP, Levine AJ, Wagner F, Bloch J, Squair JW, Courtine G. The neurons that restore walking after paralysis. Nature. 2022 Nov;611(7936):540-547. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05385-7. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
PMID: 36352232BACKGROUNDPowell MP, Verma N, Sorensen E, Carranza E, Boos A, Fields DP, Roy S, Ensel S, Barra B, Balzer J, Goldsmith J, Friedlander RM, Wittenberg GF, Fisher LE, Krakauer JW, Gerszten PC, Pirondini E, Weber DJ, Capogrosso M. Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis. Nat Med. 2023 Mar;29(3):689-699. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02202-6. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
PMID: 36807682BACKGROUNDWist S, Clivaz J, Sattelmayer M. Muscle strengthening for hemiparesis after stroke: A meta-analysis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;59(2):114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
PMID: 26969343BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jocelyne Bloch, MD
CHUV
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2026
First Posted
May 28, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2032
Last Updated
June 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share