Intraoperative Driving Pressure and Postoperative Lung Ultrasound Score in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Intraoperative Driving Pressure and Postoperative Lung Ultrasound Score in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
1 other identifier
observational
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between intraoperative driving pressure and postoperative lung ultrasound scores in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. During this specific surgery, factors such as pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning can significantly affect respiratory mechanics. Postoperative lung condition will be objectively assessed using the lung ultrasound score (LUS). The findings may provide valuable insights for optimizing intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2026
June 11, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 months
May 5, 2026
June 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) From Preoperative Baseline to 24 Hours Postoperatively
The primary outcome is the difference in lung aeration between preoperative baseline (LUS 0, at T0: pre-induction, awake, supine) and 24 hours postoperatively (LUS 2). Lung aeration is evaluated via a 12-region ultrasound protocol; each quadrant is scored 0-3, yielding a total of 0-36 (higher scores indicate worse aeration). This change (LUS 0 to LUS 2) will be correlated with the mean intraoperative driving pressure (ΔP = Pplat - PEEP). Mean ΔP is calculated as the average of measurements obtained at predefined intraoperative milestones: T\_basal (immediately post-intubation), T1 (1st hour, immediately post-establishment of pneumoperitoneum and deep Trendelenburg), T2, T3, T4, T5 (hourly intervals during pneumoperitoneum/Trendelenburg maintenance), and T\_neutral (within 10 minutes post-desufflation, return to supine).
Baseline LUS0 (T0: pre-induction) and 24 hours postoperatively (LUS 2).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS) From Preoperative Baseline(LUS0) to 30 Minutes Postoperatively(LUS1)
Baseline (T0: pre-induction) and 30 minutes postoperatively (LUS 1).
Correlation Between Total Anesthesia Duration and Postoperative Changes in Lung Ultrasound Scores (LUS)
From the start of anesthesia induction until extubation (for total duration, assessed up to 6 hours) and at specific assessment points: Baseline (T0), 30 minutes postoperatively (LUS 1), and 24 hours postoperatively (LUS 2).
Correlation of Intraoperative Mechanical Power With Changes in Lung Ultrasound Scores (LUS)
Intraoperatively from anesthesia induction to the end of surgery (for mechanical power data collection, assessed up to 6 hours) and at Baseline (T0), 30 minutes (LUS 1), and 24 hours postoperatively (LUS 2) for ultrasound scores.
Correlation Between Intraoperative Driving Pressure and Arterial Blood Gas Parameters
Intraoperatively, at specific predefined milestones: T_basal, T1 (1st hour, immediately post-pneumoperitoneum/Trendelenburg), T2, T3, T4, T5, and T_neutral (assessed up to 6 hours).
Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs) and Correlation With Intraoperative Driving Pressure
From the end of surgery (extubation) up to 24 hours postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult male patients scheduled for elective robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Etlik City Hospital.
You may qualify if:
- Male patients aged between 18 and 80 years.
- Scheduled for elective robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III.
- Willingness to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal to participate.
- Severe obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease (e.g., severe COPD, uncontrolled asthma).
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m\^2.
- Pre-existing severe lung pathology or active pulmonary infection.
- Hemodynamic instability or severe cardiovascular disease (e.g., severe heart failure, recent myocardial infarction).
- Requirement for postoperative mechanical ventilation.
- Emergency surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, Ankara, 06170, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Yoon HK, Kim BR, Yoon S, Jeong YH, Ku JH, Kim WH. The Effect of Ventilation with Individualized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Postoperative Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 19;10(4):850. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040850.
PMID: 33669526RESULTLi Y, Xu W, Cui Y, Sun Y, Wang C, Wen Z, An K. Effects of driving pressure-guided ventilation by individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Anesth. 2023 Dec;37(6):896-904. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03251-y. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
PMID: 37707572RESULTZhang Y, Zhu J, Xi C, Wang G. Effect of driving pressure-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation strategy on postoperative atelectasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2025 Mar 26;26(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08819-5.
PMID: 40140868RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
May 28, 2026
Study Start
May 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 20, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 15, 2026
Last Updated
June 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share