Comparison of IV Analgesia Protocols After the Regional Block's Effect Diminishes in Thoracic Surgery
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Intravenous Analgesia Protocols Used After the Duration of Block Action for Postoperative Pain Control in Thoracic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
135
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three different intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) regimens-Fentanyl, Tramadol, and Ibuprofen-in managing postoperative pain and respiratory performance in patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS). While regional blocks like Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block provide effective early analgesia, their effect typically diminishes after 8-12 hours, leading to potential 'rebound pain.' This study specifically investigates the period following the duration of the regional block's action. The primary goal is to evaluate which IV PCA protocol better controls pain (Visual Analog Scale scores) and supports better respiratory performance (measured by incentive spirometry) during the first 72 hours post-surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 27, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2026
June 9, 2026
May 1, 2026
4 months
May 14, 2026
June 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain Intensity (VAS)
Evaluation of postoperative pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Both static (at rest) and dynamic (during coughing) VAS scores are recorded to assess the quality of analgesia. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst possible pain". Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Postoperative 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Maximal Inspiratory Volume (ml)
Postoperative 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours.
Rescue Analgesic Requirement
Postoperative 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours.
Length of Hospital and ICU Stay
From surgery until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.
Incidence of Postoperative Side Effects
Up to 72 hours postoperatively.
Study Arms (3)
Group F (Fentanyl Group)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group are assigned to receive intravenous (IV) Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) using a fentanyl solution. The treatment is initiated either at the 6th postoperative hour or upon the first request for analgesia (VAS \>4). This arm is the potent opioid-based treatment group.
Group T (Tramadol Group)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group are assigned to receive IV PCA using a tramadol solution. Similar to Group F, the protocol is initiated at the 6th postoperative hour or at the first analgesic demand. This arm represents the weak opioid-based approach.
Group I (Ibuprofen Group)
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group are assigned to receive IV PCA using an ibuprofen solution. Similar to Group F and T, the protocol is initiated at the 6th postoperative hour or at the first analgesic demand. This arm is the non-opioid, NSAID-based treatment group.
Interventions
Patients receive intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) using a fentanyl solution (4 mcg/ml), initiated at the 6th postoperative hour (or earlier if VAS \>4) and continued for 72 hours. Basal infusion rate: 0.2 μg/kg/h Demand bolus dose: 20 μg Lockout interval: 20 minutes
Patients receive intravenous PCA using a tramadol solution (2 mg/ml), initiated at the 6th postoperative hour (or earlier if VAS \>4) and continued for 72 hours. Basal infusion rate: 10 mg/h Demand bolus dose: 10 mg Lockout interval: 20 minutes
Patients receive intravenous PCA using an ibuprofen solution (2 mg/ml), initiated at the 6th postoperative hour (or earlier if VAS \>4) and continued for 72 hours. Basal infusion rate: 20 mg/h Demand bolus dose: 10 mg Lockout interval: 20 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients aged 18 to 80 years.
- \- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status Score of I-III.
- \- Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kg/m².
- \- Undergoing elective thoracic surgery via Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS).
- \- Voluntary participation confirmed by signing the written Informed Consent Form.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Age below 18 or above 80 years.
- \- Advanced organ failure (e.g., severe hepatic or renal impairment).
- \- ASA physical status \> III.
- \- History of chronic pain treatment or long-term opioid use.
- \- BMI \< 18 kg/m² or \> 35 kg/m².
- \- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- \- Limited cooperation due to dementia or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders.
- \- Communication barriers (inability to communicate in the native language).
- \- History of substance or drug abuse.
- \- Known allergy or contraindication to the study drugs (Fentanyl, Tramadol, or Ibuprofen).
- \- Contraindication to regional block placement (e.g., infection at the injection site).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Ankara, Keçiören, 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Feray S, Lubach J, Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Van de Velde M; PROSPECT Working Group *of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. PROSPECT guidelines for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):311-325. doi: 10.1111/anae.15609. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
PMID: 34739134BACKGROUNDMitchell J, Couvreur C, Forget P. Recent Advances in Perioperative Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):38. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010038.
PMID: 39797121BACKGROUNDHarris DJ, Hilliard PE, Jewell ES, Brummett CM. The association between incentive spirometry performance and pain in postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):232-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000239.
PMID: 25899952BACKGROUNDSun JJ, Xiang XB, Xu GH, Cheng XQ. A Novel Opioid-Sparing Analgesia Following Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Non-Inferiority Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Jun 6;17:1641-1650. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S405990. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37305403BACKGROUNDYu H, Tian W, Xu Z, Jiang R, Jin L, Mao W, Chen Y, Yu H. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with opioids after thoracoscopic lung surgery: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01785-4.
PMID: 35941536BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dilek Unal, MD, Prof.
University of Health Sciences, Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- While the primary investigator responsible for the administration and adjustment of the Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) devices was aware of the group assignments, the patients were blinded to the specific drug they received. Furthermore, the researchers who recorded the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and measured the incentive spirometry volumes at each visit were blinded to the treatment groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2026
First Posted
May 28, 2026
Study Start
June 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 27, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 15, 2026
Last Updated
June 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data collected during the study are considered confidential institutional data according to the study protocol and informed consent forms approved by the local ethics committee. The data will only be available to authorized regulatory bodies and the investigation team to ensure participant privacy and data security.