Effect of Immediate Placement and Loading of Compressive Versus Conventional Implants

NCT07601347 | Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: 202626
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The current study aims to compare immediate placement and loading of compressive versus conventional dental implants after atraumatic extraction regarding the effectiveness, bone resorption and survival of each of them.

Conditions

Other Endosseous Dental Implant Failure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• stability

  using AnyCheck Device from 1 to 100

  6 months

• Pain after the surgery

  using visual analogue scale from 1 to 10

  6 months

• Crestal Bone resorption and deposition

  using cone beam computed tomography .

  6 months

• Crestal bone loss

  using periodontal probe

  6 months

Study Arms (2)

Immediate placement of conventional endosteal implants

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Removal of non restorable tooth then immediate placement of conventional implants then immediate loading

Procedure: Immediate implant placement and loading

Immediate placement of compressive implants

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Removal of non restorable tooth then immediate placement of compressive implants then immediate loading

Procedure: Immediate implant placement and loading

Interventions

Immediate implant placement and loading PROCEDURE

1. Preoperative Cone beam 2. Articaine 4% local anesthesia in two sides 3. Piezoelectric device used around the badly decay tooth 4. Ensuring the preservation of the associated gingiva and papillae. 5. Following the elevation of the flap, atraumatic extraction by using piezoelectric device: A. The teeth will be retrieved without stress. B. The Conventional dental implant will be put directly into the alveolar bone c. Placement of healing abutment in conventional implant and measurement d. Stability measured using AnyCheck or periotest device of both implants and crestal bone level by periodontal probe postoperatively. e. Suturing f. Cone beam xray postoperatively g. Postoperative instructions and medications h. after one week immediate loading by placement of temporary pmma crown

Immediate placement of conventional endosteal implants

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 40 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Medically free patient
• Males and females
• Non-smoker patients
• Age ranging from 20-40 years
• Badly destructed upper premolar teeth that require implants, bone covering 2/3 of the root and of sufficient bone volume.

You may not qualify if:

• Patients with systemic conditions known to affect the periodontal status and healing such as uncontrolled diabetes and osteoporosis
• Heavy smokers
• Unfavorable position of the tooth or remaining roots
• Vitamin D deficiency,
• Periapical lesion/ periodontal affection

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Ahmed Nagi Alghandour: lead

Study Sites (1)

Beni-suef university

Banī Suwayf, Egypt

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

ahmed alghandour, phd

CONTACT

01224567435; ahmed.nagi@dent.bsu.eg

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: dr ahmed nagi alghandour

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 30, 2026
• First Posted: May 22, 2026
• Study Start: December 1, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): December 1, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): December 1, 2026
• Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations

EG (1)