Endoscopic Versus Conventional Parotidectomy for Benign Parotid Tumors
miniparo
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare endoscopic and conventional parotidectomy in the management of benign parotid tumors regarding surgical outcomes, facial nerve preservation, operative time, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results, in order to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and potential advantages of the endoscopic minimally invasive technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 29, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
May 20, 2026
May 1, 2026
8 months
May 15, 2026
May 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Surgical safety and feasibility
Assessment of intraoperative and postoperative complications and conversion rate to open surgery.
During surgery and up to 3 months postoperatively.
Facial nerve function
Assessment using House-Brackmann grading system.
24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Intraoperative blood loss
Intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Endoscopic Parotidectomy Group
EXPERIMENTALExperimental Arm Endoscopic Parotidectomy
Conventional Open Parotidectomy Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional Parotidectomy
Interventions
Minimally invasive endoscopic-assisted parotidectomy performed through anterior chest wall approach for benign parotid tumors.
Conventional open parotidectomy performed through modified Blair incision for management of benign parotid tumors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Patients with benign parotid tumors involving the superficial lobe of the parotid gland
- Tumors located in the inferior pole with or without limited deep lobe extension
- Tumor size suitable for minimally invasive approach ≤4 cm
- Patients fit for surgery under general anesthesia
- Patients willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent parotid tumors
- Previous parotid surgery on the affected side
- Pre-existing facial nerve dysfunction
- Previous neck surgery or extensive cervical/anterior chest wall scarring
- Significant comorbidities contraindicating surgery or general anesthesia
- Suspected or confirmed malignant parotid tumors
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of General Surgery, Maxillofacial and Head and Neck Unit
Asyut, 2063045, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
O'Brien CJ. Current management of benign parotid tumors--the role of limited superficial parotidectomy. Head Neck. 2003 Nov;25(11):946-52. doi: 10.1002/hed.10312.
PMID: 14603455BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2026
First Posted
May 20, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 29, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be publicly available. De-identified data may be available from the principal investigator upon reasonable academic request and after approval by the Institutional Review Board.