Topical Capsaicin Versus Diclofenac for Chronic Temporomandibular Joint-Related Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of topical capsaicin cream and topical diclofenac gel in women with chronic temporomandibular joint-related pain. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does topical capsaicin reduce pain intensity more effectively than topical diclofenac?
- Do the treatments improve jaw function, pressure pain threshold, and neuropathic pain symptoms? Researchers will compare topical capsaicin cream with topical diclofenac gel to evaluate differences in pain relief and functional improvement. Participants will:
- Apply the assigned topical medication four times daily for 7 days
- Attend clinical examinations and pain assessments at baseline, Day 8, and Month 1
- Complete pain-related questionnaires and functional jaw measurements during follow-up visits
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 28, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedJuly 1, 2026
June 1, 2026
7 months
May 14, 2026
June 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity was evaluated using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in patients with temporomandibular disorder-related pain. Changes in VAS scores were compared between the capsaicin and diclofenac
Baseline, Day 8, and 1 Month
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pressure Pain Threshold
Baseline, Day 8, and 1 Month
Maximum Mouth Opening
Baseline, Day 8, and 1 Month
McGill Pain Questionnaire Scores
Baseline, Day 8, and 1 Month
DN4 Neuropathic Pain Scores
Baseline, Day 8, and 1 Month
Lateral Excursion Measurements
Baseline, Day 8, and 1 Month
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Capsaicin Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 0.075% topical capsaicin cream applied four times daily over the temporomandibular joint lateral pole region for 7 days.
Diclofenac Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received 1% diclofenac diethylammonium gel applied four times daily over the temporomandibular joint lateral pole region for 7 days.
Interventions
Topical capsaicin cream applied four times daily over the temporomandibular joint region for 7 days.
Topical diclofenac diethylammonium gel applied four times daily over the temporomandibular joint region for 7 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female participants aged between 18 and 65 years
- Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder (TMD)-related pain
- Presence of pain for at least 3 months
- Baseline pain intensity sufficient to require treatment
- Willingness to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits
- Signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to capsaicin or diclofenac
- Presence of systemic inflammatory or neurological disease
- Use of systemic analgesics, corticosteroids, or muscle relaxants during the study period
- Active skin lesions or dermatologic disease in the application area
- Previous temporomandibular joint surgery
- Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days
- Inability to comply with study procedures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Mena M, Dalbah L, Levi L, Padilla M, Enciso R. Efficacy of topical interventions for temporomandibular disorders compared to placebo or control therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):337-356. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.6.337. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
PMID: 33409363BACKGROUNDHaanpaa M, Treede RD. Capsaicin for neuropathic pain: linking traditional medicine and molecular biology. Eur Neurol. 2012;68(5):264-75. doi: 10.1159/000339944. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
PMID: 23037991BACKGROUNDKlinge SA, Sawyer GA. Effectiveness and safety of topical versus oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a comprehensive review. Phys Sportsmed. 2013 May;41(2):64-74. doi: 10.3810/psm.2013.05.2016.
PMID: 23703519BACKGROUNDAlomar X, Medrano J, Cabratosa J, Clavero JA, Lorente M, Serra I, Monill JM, Salvador A. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007 Jun;28(3):170-83. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2007.02.002.
PMID: 17571700BACKGROUNDGan TJ. Diclofenac: an update on its mechanism of action and safety profile. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jul;26(7):1715-31. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.486301.
PMID: 20470236BACKGROUNDCraft RM, Mogil JS, Aloisi AM. Sex differences in pain and analgesia: the role of gonadal hormones. Eur J Pain. 2004 Oct;8(5):397-411. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.01.003.
PMID: 15324772BACKGROUNDHarper DE, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ. Pain Mechanisms and Centralized Pain in Temporomandibular Disorders. J Dent Res. 2016 Sep;95(10):1102-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034516657070. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
PMID: 27422858BACKGROUNDBusse JW, Casassus R, Carrasco-Labra A, Durham J, Mock D, Zakrzewska JM, Palmer C, Samer CF, Coen M, Guevremont B, Hoppe T, Guyatt GH, Crandon HN, Yao L, Sadeghirad B, Vandvik PO, Siemieniuk RAC, Lytvyn L, Hunskaar BS, Agoritsas T. Management of chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2023 Dec 15;383:e076227. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076227.
PMID: 38101929BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants were blinded to treatment allocation during the study period.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2026
First Posted
May 20, 2026
Study Start
August 28, 2025
Primary Completion
April 6, 2026
Study Completion
April 6, 2026
Last Updated
July 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06