The Co-Production and Evaluation of the Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease (CoCoA-PAD)
CoCoA-PAD
2 other identifiers
observational
120
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Background. Healthcare professionals can now diagnose the earliest stages of Alzheimer's disease (early-AD) and new drugs are effective at slowing the disease. The National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom has started to develop plans for how to implement these key achievements into clinical practice, so that patients can receive timely diagnosis and treatment. Cognitive assessments measure someone's memory and thinking skills and are required for an early-AD diagnosis. There are concerns that the NHS does not have the workforce to deliver cognitive assessments, and that this will delay early-AD diagnosis and treatment. Memory nurses are the largest staffing group in memory services. I have developed a plan for memory nurses to deliver full cognitive assessments. This would prevent delays to early diagnosis and treatment. Research Aims. This research will use a co-design approach. This involves working with service users and memory nurses to co-develop and evaluate a new cognitive assessment and cognitive training course for nurses. Research Methods. The cognitive assessment and training course will be evaluated using service-user and nurse feedback. 120 older adults with subjective memory complaints will be asked to complete a cognitive assessment, a brain scan, and a blood test. We will use this information to tell us if the cognitive assessment is good enough. Patient and Public Involvement. This proposal was co-developed with older adults and memory nurses. The adapted cognitive assessment and the cognitive training will be co-created with ten older adults and five memory-nurses, who will consult on all stages of the project. Dissemination. The research findings will be published in academic journals and conferences, and an information-sheet will be created for the public. The cognitive training resources will be made freely available. We will use the results of this research to request funding to translate the cognitive assessment into an NHS approved health-technology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2026
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2028
May 20, 2026
May 1, 2026
1.7 years
May 9, 2026
May 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE)
Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE) trial 2 learning score for both Set 1 and Set 2 stimuli. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better learning performance.
12 month follow up assessment
Matching Animals and Names Exam - Total Binding Score
Matching Animals and Name Exam (MANE) binding scores. The task includes associative binding, temporal binding, and spatial binding scores. Each score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating better binding performance. These scores are combined into a total binding score (0-36).
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Colour and Object Binding and Location Test trial 3
Colour and Object Binding and Location Test (COBALT) trial 3 object score. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better object recognition performance.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Binding of Allocentric Spatial and Location Transformations (BASALT) total score
Binding of Allocentric Spatial and Location Transformations (BASALT) total score. The score is calculated from four trials, each scored from 0 to 6. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating better spatial binding and allocentric transformation performance.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
False Familiarity Task
False Familiarity Task false positive score. Scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more false positive responses and poorer discrimination between previously presented and similar items. The primary outcome is the total number of mnemonic errors.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Dichotic Sentence Identification score
Dichotic Sentence Identification score. The task includes left ear, right ear, and ear discrepancy scores. Left ear and right ear scores each range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better sentence identification performance. The ear discrepancy score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a greater difference between left and right ear performance.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Dichotic Digits Test score
Dichotic Digits Test score. The task includes left ear, right ear, and ear discrepancy scores. Left ear and right ear scores each range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better digit identification performance. The ear discrepancy score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a greater difference between left and right ear performance.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Odd-One-Out Test
Odd-One-Out perceptual discrimination. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more errors and poorer perceptual discrimination performance. Additionally, we will be timing participants. Adjusted time to complete scores will also be recorded, with longer time associated with greater levels of difficulty.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Verbal fluency semantic relatedness
Verbal fluency semantic relatedness score. This score will quantify the semantic relatedness of words generated during the verbal fluency task using a pre-specified analysis pipeline. Higher scores indicate greater semantic relatedness between generated words.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Structure-from-Motion coherence threshold
Structure-from-Motion coherence threshold. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating a higher coherence threshold and poorer structure-from-motion perception.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Dynamic rotating Glass pattern coherence threshold
Dynamic rotating Glass pattern coherence threshold. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating a higher coherence threshold and poorer dynamic form perception.
Baseline; repeat assessment at 12 months for a subset of participants.
Study Arms (1)
At risk for Alzheimer's Disease
A mixed cohort of participants with either subjective cognitive decline (SCD+) or mild cognitive impairment will be recruited to the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a research descriptor used to refer to people who believe that their cognitive functioning has deteriorated despite performing in the 'normal' range on objective measures of cognitive functioning. People with SCD are at increased risk of developing dementia, and therefore SCD is considered a potential early clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a descriptor used to refer to people who report experiencing a decline in cognitive functioning and demonstrate cognitive impairment on objective testing. It is thought to be a transitional phase between normal aging and dementia.
You may qualify if:
- \>3.38 on IQCODE Self-Report items 1-7 (PROTECT) OR
- ≥4 on SCD-Q9 (non-Protect) AND
- Age ≥65 years
- Onset of SCD within the last 5 years
- English as a first language
- Normal demographically adjusted performance on standardised cognitive tests
- Specific Race and Education (using stratified sampling approach)
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment, i.e., performance ≥1 SD below demographically adjusted norms (PROTECT) OR
- ≤17 on the telephone MoCA (non-PROTECT) AND
- Lacks mental capacity to consent to research
- Diagnosis of dementia
- Sensory impairment that cannot be corrected for with sensory aids, e.g., blindness.
- Previous neurological injury (stroke, traumatic brain injury, severe epilepsy, brain tumour)
- Other neurodegenerative syndrome (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, etc)
- Diagnosis of learning disability
- Severe depression (PHQ-9≥15 OR score ≥1 on PHQ-9 suicide question
- Current severe psychiatric disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or psychotic disorders)
- Current drug or alcohol abuse
- Untreated diagnosis of sleep apnoea.
- \>3.38 on IQCODE Self-Report items 1-7 (PROTECT)
- Cognitive impairment, i.e., performance ≥1 SD below demographically adjusted norms (PROTECT) OR
- ≥4 on SCD-Q9 (non-PROTECT)
- +17 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Plymouthlead
- Devon Partnership NHS Trustcollaborator
- North East London Foundation Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
Plymouth, Devon, Plymouth PL6 8BU, United Kingdom
Research Delivery Team
Exeter, United Kingdom
North East London NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nicolas Farina, PhD
University of Plymouth
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral Clinical and Practitioner Academic Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2026
First Posted
May 20, 2026
Study Start
May 5, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2028
Last Updated
May 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05