Is a Standard Hand Rehabilitation Program Sufficient in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Central Sensitization
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The presence of central sensitization leads to overestimation of pain sensitivity and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Central sensitization should not be overlooked in RA patients to avoid over-treatment for inflammation and to determine the need for treatment of nociplastic pain. While literature contains no studies comparing alternative programs with the standard hand rehabilitation program in the presence of central sensitization in rheumatoid arthritis patients, the objective of this study is to investigate whether desensitization exercises provide additional benefit in this patient group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 22, 2026
ExpectedMay 20, 2026
May 1, 2026
4 months
May 12, 2026
May 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
VAS
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is used to assess pain intensity. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst possible pain." Lower scores indicate a better clinical outcome.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3-month exercise program, and at the 6-month follow-up.
CENTRAL DESENSİTİZATİON SCALE
Participants were categorized based on their Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) scores, which range from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (extreme symptoms). A clinical threshold was set at 40; participants scoring 40 or higher were identified as meeting the criteria for central sensitization
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3-month exercise program, and at the 6-month follow-up.
DURUOZ HAND INDEX
Participants achieved a functional response based on the Duruöz Hand Index (DHI), which ranges from 0 (best outcome) to 90 (worst outcome). A response was defined as a significant reduction in the total score from baseline, where lower scores indicate improved hand function and independence in daily activities.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3-month exercise program, and at the 6-month follow-up.
Dynamometer-measured hand grip strength measurements (kg)
Hand grip strength was measured using a calibrated dynamometer to assess isometric muscle strength. Results are reported in kilograms (kg). On this scale, higher values indicate greater muscle strength and better physical performance (best outcome), while lower values indicate reduced grip strength (worst outcome).
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3-month exercise program, and at the 6-month follow-up.
Pinchmeter-measured finger strength measurements (kg) (Tip, Lateral, Palmar)
Finger pinch strength was measured using a calibrated pinchmeter to evaluate fine motor strength in three positions: Tip pinch (thumb to index finger), Lateral pinch (thumb to the radial side of the index finger), and Palmar pinch (thumb to index and middle fingers). Measurements are recorded in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater functional strength and better hand performance (best outcome), whereas lower values indicate reduced pinch force (worst outcome).
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3-month exercise program, and at the 6-month follow-up.
Study Arms (3)
Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
EXPERIMENTALSARAH Exercise
Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Central Sensitization1
EXPERIMENTALSARAH Exercise
Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Central Sensitization2
EXPERIMENTALSARAH Exercise + Desensitization Exercises
Interventions
Participants will be asked to practice home exercises every day of the week for 12 weeks. The SARAH exercise program consists of 7 mobility and 4 strengthening exercises. Progress will be made by increasing the repetitions and duration of the exercises every week.
Participants will be asked to practice home exercises every day of the week for 12 weeks. The SARAH exercise program consists of 7 mobility and 4 strengthening exercises. Progress will be made by increasing the repetitions and duration of the exercises every week.
Participants will be asked to practice home exercises every day of the week for 12 weeks. The SARAH exercise program consists of 7 mobility and 4 strengthening exercises. In addition to the strengthening and mobility exercises, participants will also perform desensitization exercises 7 days a week for 3 months. Progress will be made by increasing the repetitions and duration of the exercises every week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Having had surgery on the extremity to be treated within the last 6 months
- Patients with active arthritis
- Patients with cognitive deficit
- Patients who do not consent to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fulya Coşkunlead
Study Sites (1)
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim Ve Araştirma Hastanesi Validebağ Ek Hizmet Binasi
Istanbul, ÜSKÜDAR, 34674, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Mesci N, Mesci E, Kandemir EU, Kulcu DG, Celik T. Impact of central sensitization on clinical parameters in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. North Clin Istanb. 2024 Apr 22;11(2):140-146. doi: 10.14744/nci.2023.81231. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38757102BACKGROUNDWilliams MA, Srikesavan C, Heine PJ, Bruce J, Brosseau L, Hoxey-Thomas N, Lamb SE. Exercise for rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 31;7(7):CD003832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003832.pub3.
PMID: 30063798BACKGROUNDEngland BR, Smith BJ, Baker NA, Barton JL, Oatis CA, Guyatt G, Anandarajah A, Carandang K, Chan KK, Constien D, Davidson E, Dodge CV, Bemis-Dougherty A, Everett S, Fisher N, Fraenkel L, Goodman SM, Lewis J, Menzies V, Moreland LW, Navarro-Millan I, Patterson S, Phillips LR, Shah N, Singh N, White D, AlHeresh R, Barbour KE, Bye T, Guglielmo D, Haberman R, Johnson T, Kleiner A, Lane CY, Li LC, Master H, Pinto D, Poole JL, Steinbarger K, Sztubinski D, Thoma L, Tsaltskan V, Turgunbaev M, Wells C, Turner AS, Treadwell JR. 2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for Exercise, Rehabilitation, Diet, and Additional Integrative Interventions for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Aug;75(8):1603-1615. doi: 10.1002/acr.25117. Epub 2023 May 25.
PMID: 37227116BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- asistant doctor in physical medicine and rehabilitation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2026
First Posted
May 20, 2026
Study Start
August 22, 2025
Primary Completion
December 22, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 22, 2026
Last Updated
May 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05