NCT07595601

Brief Summary

Background: Practice guidelines require emergency and critical care nurses (ECC) to be skillful in ECG and cardiac monitoring. Evidence suggests that nurses' proficiency is still inadequate with this regard. Computer interpretation of the ECG (CIE) is accurate and improves clinicians' accuracy in ECG interpretation. Unfortunately, nurses are not taught or trained to use this technology. Through this study the investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness of three educational interventions to improve ECC nurses' proficiency in CIE. Methods. The investigators applied a randomized mixed, crossover and parallel, design. Linear mixed model analysis was used to examine differences in CIE test score among groups and across time. There were three interventional groups (G0, no intervention then flyer; G1, face-to-face then online; and G2, online then face-to-face) with three points of time measurement (T0, baselines; T1, after first intervention, and T2 after second intervention).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
268

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2026

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 19, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 19, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Electrocardiographycomputer interpretationECGemergency and critical careinterpretation softwarealgorithmnurse

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Emergency and Critical Care Nurses Proficiency in Computer Interpretation of the ECG

    Emergency and Critical Care Nurses scores on the "Computer Interpretation of the ECG" test score. The test is scored out of 28 (range 0 to 28), with higher scores indicating greater proficiency. The test scale name is "Computer Interpretation of the ECG" test scale

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 months

Study Arms (3)

no intervention then a flyer

EXPERIMENTAL

the flyer was a small, palm-sized, crafted from fine-quality material, thoughtfully designed to be colorful, visually inviting, and easy going, featuring carefully selected introductory images, ample whitespace, and minimal text to ensure clarity, quick engagement, and polished first impression.

Other: Flyer

Face-to-face then online lectures

EXPERIMENTAL

the face-to-face content included audiovisual aids, case scenarios, and immediate feedback discussions. The online content included artificial intelligence enhanced audiovisual aids (videos and images), integrated interactive feedback mechanisms (e.g., requiring the participant to scan a QR code and respond to real-time MCQ questions). The face-to-face lecture time was totally 45 minutes. The online total lecture time was 25 minutes.

Other: face-to-face lectureOther: Online lecture

Online then face-to-face lectures

EXPERIMENTAL

the face-to-face content included audiovisual aids, case scenarios, and immediate feedback discussions. The online content included artificial intelligence enhanced audiovisual aids (videos and images), integrated interactive feedback mechanisms (e.g., requiring the participant to scan a QR code and respond to real-time MCQ questions). The face-to-face lecture time was totally 45 minutes. The online total lecture time was 25 minutes.

Other: face-to-face lectureOther: Online lecture

Interventions

FlyerOTHER

the flyer was a small, palm-sized, crafted from fine-quality material, thoughtfully designed to be colorful, visually inviting, and easy going, featuring carefully selected introductory images, ample whitespace, and minimal text to ensure clarity, quick engagement, and polished first impression.

no intervention then a flyer

the face-to-face content included audiovisual aids, case scenarios, and immediate feedback discussions. The face-to-face lecture time was totally 45 minutes

Face-to-face then online lecturesOnline then face-to-face lectures

The online content included artificial intelligence enhanced audiovisual aids (videos and images), integrated interactive feedback mechanisms (e.g., requiring the participant to scan a QR code and respond to real-time MCQ questions). The online total lecture time was 25 minutes.

Face-to-face then online lecturesOnline then face-to-face lectures

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Every nurse working in the emergency department and critical care units of the participating hospitals

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Jordan

Amman, 11942, Jordan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Emergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Amer M Hasanien, PhD

    The University of Jordan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This is a randomized mixed (hybrid) crossover and parallel (delayed intervention) design. Participating ECC nurses were randomly assigned to 3 groups (G0, G1, and G2), Figure 1. We employed a crossover comparison design of face-to-face and online educational interventions for groups G1 and G2, and a parallel delayed flyer educational intervention for group G0. Specifically, G1 received face-to-face then online educational interventions. G2 received online then face-to-face educational interventions. G0 received no intervention then a flyer.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor. Head of Clinical Nursing Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2026

First Posted

May 19, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

May 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all, except identifying information. Based on reasonable request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
time of official publication to May 8th 2029
Access Criteria
from any researcher from any country. They will be able to access all but identifying information. access is through contacting the corresponding author.
More information

Locations