NCT07593300

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided Romboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block versus lower thoracic Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ultrasound-guided Romboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block is effective as the lower thoracic Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block for intra and postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic abdominal surgery for the first 24 hours? What complications do participants have when doing these interventions? Researchers will compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided Romboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block with the lower thoracic Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Participants will: Start general anesthesia and be given either block according to the randomization chart. The blood pressure and heart rate will be measured at intervals to determine if the participants need extra intraoperative analgesics. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be used postoperatively to test pain severity. Rescue morphine analgesia will be measured and compared in both groups. Any complications will be reported. Patient and surgeon satisfaction will be measured.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
May 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2026

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 18, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 20, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

May 18, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Erector Spine Plane BlockLaparoscopic surgeryRhomboid Intercostal block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative analgesia

    Pain will be assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0-10 scale). Will be measured by NRS at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperative 1. Mild pain (NRS 1-3) will be treated with 1 g paracetamol IV every six hours (maximum 4 g/day). 2. Moderate pain (NRS 4-6) will receive the same paracetamol regimen plus ketorolac 30 mg IV every eight hours (maximum 120 mg/day). 3. Severe pain (NRS 7-10) will receive the above plus 0.1 mg/kg IV morphine when indicated.

    from 0 to 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Total morphine consumption (mg) in 24 h.

    from 0 to 24 hours postoperative

  • Intra-operative vital signs (HR)

    Before induction of anesthesia till the end of surgery

  • • Intra-operative vital signs: Mean Blood Pressure (MBP)

    Before induction of anesthesia till the end of surgery

  • Possible complications

    Intra- and post-operatively for 24 hours.

Study Arms (2)

Group A (n=35): Ultrasound-guided RISS block.

EXPERIMENTAL

The patient will be positioned in the lateral decubitus with the ipsilateral arm abducted to move the scapula laterally and open the intercostal and subscapular spaces. A high-frequency linear probe (10-14 MHz) will be applied 1-2 cm medial to the medial scapular border in an oblique-sagittal plane at the T5-T6 level. Using an in-plane approach, a 22 G, 80 mm block needle will be advanced from superomedial to inferolateral (cephalocaudal) until the tip lies between RM and ICM. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection with 1-2 ml saline, 10 ml of the prepared solution (1% lidocaine + 0.25% bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone) will be injected in 5 ml aliquots, with real-time observation of spread deep to RM. The probe will then be slid caudally and laterally to the T8-T9 level to visualize the fascial plane at the mid-axillary line between the serratus anterior (SA) muscle and the external intercostal muscle to inject the other 10 ml of local anesthetic.

Procedure: Group A (n=35): Ultrasound-guided RISS block (RISS):

Group B (n=35): Receiving ultrasound-guided lower thoracic ESP block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patient will be positioned laterally. A linear probe will be placed 3 cm lateral to the posterior midline at the T8-T9 level to identify the transverse process (TP) and erector spinae muscle (ESM). A 22 G, 80 mm Echogenic block needle will be advanced in-plane from cranial to caudal until the tip rests deep to ESM but superficial to the TP. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of the prepared solution (1% lidocaine + 0.25% bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone) will be injected in 5 ml aliquots, with real-time ultrasound confirmation of longitudinal spread cranially and caudally along the fascial plane. The block will be performed bilaterally following the same stepsA solution composed of 20 ml mixed xylocaine 1% + 0.25 % bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone on each side.

Procedure: Group B (n=35): Ultrasound-guided lower thoracic ESP block

Interventions

The patient will be positioned in the lateral decubitus with the ipsilateral arm abducted to move the scapula laterally and open the intercostal and subscapular spaces. A high-frequency linear probe (10-14 MHz) will be applied 1-2 cm medial to the medial scapular border in an oblique-sagittal plane at the T5-T6 level. Using an in-plane approach, a 22 G, 80 mm block needle will be advanced from superomedial to inferolateral (cephalocaudal) until the tip lies between RM and ICM. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection with 1-2 ml saline, 10 ml of the prepared solution (1% lidocaine + 0.25% bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone) will be injected in 5 ml aliquots, with real-time observation of spread deep to RM. The probe will then be slid caudally and laterally to the T8-T9 level to visualize the fascial plane at the mid-axillary line between the serratus anterior (SA) muscle and the external intercostal muscle to inject the other 10 ml of local anesthetic.

Group A (n=35): Ultrasound-guided RISS block.

The patient will be positioned laterally. A linear probe will be placed 3 cm lateral to the posterior midline at the T8-T9 level to identify the transverse process (TP) and erector spinae muscle (ESM). A 22 G, 80 mm Echogenic block needle will be advanced in-plane from cranial to caudal until the tip rests deep to ESM but superficial to the TP. After negative aspiration, 20 ml of the prepared solution (1% lidocaine + 0.25% bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone) will be injected in 5 ml aliquots, with real-time ultrasound confirmation of longitudinal spread cranially and caudally along the fascial plane. The block will be performed bilaterally following the same stepsA solution composed of 20 ml mixed xylocaine 1% + 0.25 % bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone on each side.

Group B (n=35): Receiving ultrasound-guided lower thoracic ESP block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for laparoscopic abdominal surgery (e.g., cholecystectomy, colectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, hernia repair, appendectomy).
  • Age from 18 - 60 years old.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I, II. (i.e., ASA I: a normal healthy patient; ASA II: patients with mild controlled systemic disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who refuse the research consent.
  • Allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
  • Cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Bleeding tendency (including pre-existing blood disease and patients on full anticoagulant therapy).
  • Morbid obese patients (BMI\>35 kg/m2)
  • Vascular compromise of lower extremity (e.g., Burger disease, Raynaud's disease).
  • Connective tissue disease (e.g., Scleroderma).
  • Suspected malignancy or intra-abdominal infection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Souad Kafafi University Hospital (SKUH), Faculty of Medicine, MUST

Giza, Giza Governorate, 15525, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Lin J, Wu H, Wen Z, Li Y, Jiang C, Lin B, Gu Y. Subserratus Anterior Plane Block vs Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 25;18:1615-1625. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S506226. eCollection 2025.

  • Wang S, Wang H, Chen X, Li M, Xu D. Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Rhomboid Intercostal and Sub-Serratus Plane Block Comparison of Thoracoscopic Intercostal Nerve Block After Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. J Pain Res. 2024 Dec 21;17:4471-4481. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S484092. eCollection 2024.

  • Elsharkawy H, Maniker R, Bolash R, Kalasbail P, Drake RL, Elkassabany N. Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block: A Cadaveric and Clinical Evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):745-751. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000824.

Study Officials

  • Manar M ElKholy, Profesor

    Prof. of Anesth, Kasr Alainy hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mohamed Abdelaziz Taha, Assist. Prof.

    Assist. Prof. of Anesth, Souad Kafafi University hospital, Faculty of Medicine, MUST

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ahmed SK Elkhodary, Lecturer

    Lecturer of surgery at Souad Kafafi University hospital, Faculty of Medicine, MUST

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Emad LM Ahmed, Lecturer

CONTACT

Mohamed M Ahmed, Resident

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Group A: Receiving ultrasound-guided RISS block. A solution composed of 20 ml mixed xylocaine 1% + 0.25 % bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone on each side. Group B: Receiving ultrasound-guided lower thoracic ESP block (T8-T9) A solution composed of 20 ml mixed xylocaine 1% + 0.25 % bupivacaine + 4 mg dexamethasone on each side. The infiltrative local anesthesia will be administered via a 22-gauge, 80-mm Echogenic block needle
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
lecturer of anesthesia, SICU and pain management, Faculty of medicine.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Posted

May 18, 2026

Study Start

May 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

May 18, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Demographic Information: Age, sex, race, and other relevant demographic details. Baseline Characteristics: Health status, medical history, and any pre-existing conditions prior to the trial. Treatment Assignment: Information on the intervention or treatment each participant received. Outcome Measures: Data on primary and secondary outcomes as defined in the trial protocol. Adverse Events: Reports of any side effects or adverse events experienced by participants during the trial. Follow-up Data: Information collected during follow-up periods, including long-term outcomes

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
may 2026 to December 2026
Access Criteria
Researchers: Who: Academic researchers, industry scientists, and regulatory agencies. What: Full IPD, including demographic data, treatment assignments, and outcome measures. How: Through data sharing platforms or repositories after submitting a research proposal and obtaining necessary approvals. Regulatory Authorities: Who: Agencies like the FDA or EMA. What: Full IPD and supporting documentation for oversight and review. How: Direct access during the review process of clinical trial applications. Data Sharing Initiatives: Who: Collaborating institutions and consortia. What: Aggregated or anonymized IPD for meta-analyses or systematic reviews. How: Via established partnerships and shared databases. Public and Patient Advocacy Groups: Who: Organizations seeking to promote transparency. What: Summary data and aggregated results, but not individual-level data. How: Through publicly available reports or dashboards.

Locations