NCT07583966

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare outcomes of digitally created altered casts with conventional altered casts in mandibular bilateral distal-extension cases.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2021

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2026

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

mandibularAltered Cast TechniquesRemovable Partial DenturesDigital

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of the condition of ridge mucosal covering of the Removable Partial Denture constructed out of digitally altered model.

    at 15 days, 3 months and 6 months .

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Denture base fit by Pressure Indicating Paste

    one month

Study Arms (2)

Digital workflow and Digital altered cast group

EXPERIMENTAL

Digital selective tissue placement was performed within the same Exocad design project using the free-form scan-data tool, paint and pull feature to apply the principles of selective tissue pressure technique . Using free form mesh editing tools, the buccal shelf area opposing teeth 37 and 47 was identified, and controlled tissue ward displacement of the mucosal surface was simulated while monitoring the magnitude of displacement on sectional views and with digital measurement tools. Figure 2B, F The modified mandibular dataset was saved as the digitally altered cast STL (DA), which served as the basis for the digital RPD design and subsequent denture base fabrication.

Procedure: Digital workflow and Digital altered cast

Conventional workflow and conventional altered cast group

EXPERIMENTAL

For the CA cast technique, one of the SLM frameworks (MF2) was adapted on the stone master cast and used as a functional impression tray (Acrostone Dental Manufacturing, Cairo, Egypt) over the distal extension areas. A selec-tive pressure impression was made according to the traditional altered cast protocol, with the distal saddle areas repoured in dental stone to obtain the CA cast. This CA was then digitized using a desktop scanner (Dove Technologies, Suzhou, China) to produce the CA cast STL. Wax rims were used to verify the jaw relationship, and the maxillary cast was mounted using a facebow transfer on a semi adjustable articulator (A7 Plus, Bio-Art Equi-pamentos Odontológicos Ltda., São Carlos, SP, Brazil), while the mandibular cast was mounted in maximum intercuspation.

Procedure: Conventional Altered Cast Technique

Interventions

The RPD design features of fully digitally fabricated RPD illustrated in Figure 2A. Digital selective tissue placement was performed within the same Exocad design project using the free-form scan-data tool, paint and pull feature to apply the principles of selective tissue pressure technique . Using free form mesh editing tools, the buccal shelf area opposing teeth 37 and 47 was identified, and controlled tissue ward displacement of the mucosal surface was simulated while monitoring the magnitude of displacement on sectional views and with digital measurement tools.

Digital workflow and Digital altered cast group

For the CA cast technique, one of the SLM frameworks (MF2) was adapted on the stone master cast and used as a functional impression tray (Acrostone Dental Manufacturing, Cairo, Egypt) over the distal extension areas. A selec-tive pressure impression was made according to the traditional altered cast protocol, with the distal saddle areas repoured in dental stone to obtain the CA cast. This CA was then digitized using a desktop scanner (Dove Technologies, Suzhou, China) to produce the CA cast STL. Wax rims were used to verify the jaw relationship, and the maxillary cast was mounted using a facebow transfer on a semi adjustable articulator (A7 Plus, Bio-Art Equi-pamentos Odontológicos Ltda., São Carlos, SP, Brazil), while the mandibular cast was mounted in maximum intercuspation. Semi anatomic acrylic teeth (Acrostone Dental Manufacturing, Cairo, Egypt.) were arranged, and wax try ins were evaluated intraorally in a conventional manner prior to processing.

Conventional workflow and conventional altered cast group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presented with bilateral, well-formed mandibular distal extension residual ridges covered by keratinized mucosa, with a minimum thickness of 1.5-3 mm .
  • Each participant had a sound first or second premolar serving as the terminal abutment, with a crown-to-root ratio of ≥ 1:2.
  • Comprised fully or partially dentate maxillary arches, an Angle Class I molar relationship, and adequate interarch space (7-8 mm) to accommodate the prosthesis .

You may not qualify if:

  • The presence of systemic conditions affecting bone metabolism or healing
  • pathological conditions in the edentulous area (e.g., residual cysts, retained roots, or severe ridge re-sorption);
  • parafunctional habits such as bruxism, clenching, or tongue thrusting
  • pro-nounced anatomical undercuts in the lingual mandible or adjacent to abutment teeth that could impede denture fabrication or insertion.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Tanta University

Tanta, Egypt

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Masking Description
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Model Description
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2026

First Posted

May 13, 2026

Study Start

May 30, 2021

Primary Completion

November 30, 2024

Study Completion

November 30, 2024

Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2021-05

Locations