NCT07583264

Brief Summary

The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of early weight bearing after OWHTO on pain, function and return to normal lifestyle activity.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
0mo left

Started Mar 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress98%
Mar 2024Jun 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 8, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 8, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2026

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 8, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

deformity correctionHigh tibial OsteotomyKnee ArthroscopyKnee Synovitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical outcome

    We used The nternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score as a validated, patient-reported outcome measure designed to quantify functional limitations, symptoms, and sports activity levels across a broad range of knee pathologies. IKDC scores are utilized to objectively assess a patient's ability to perform activities of daily living and to establish data-driven benchmarks for Return-to-Sport (RTS). Furthermore, by providing a longitudinal perspective on recovery, the scale allows us to monitor the progression of clinical improvement and determine the overall efficacy of surgical and rehabilitative interventions. The IKDC utilizes a normalized scale ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 represents the lowest possible level of function, indicating severe physical limitations and significant symptomatic distress. Conversely, a score of 100 represents the highest possible outcome, a total absence of symptoms and no limitations in either strenuous sports activities or daily living.

    All patients of both groups underwent a clinical evaluation at 6-weeks, 3-months and 6-months post-operatively to assess knee range of motion and return to daily activity life.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiological outcome

    Assessment of both groups was performed using weight-bearing standing radiographs to evaluate the degree of varus correction and screen for potential complications at 2-weeks (group1), 6-weeks, 3-months and 6-months postoperative.

Study Arms (2)

Early weight bearing group

EXPERIMENTAL

this group underwent High tibial osteotomy and started early partial weight bearing post-operative at week 2 using crutches. Quadriceps strengthening exercises, continues flexion and extension of the knee were added also to this protocol of post-operative rehabilitation.

Other: Early weight bearing post operative

Non weight bearing group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

this group underwent High tibial osteotomy and started weight bearing post-operative at week 6. Quadriceps strengthening exercises, continues flexion and extension of the knee were added also to this protocol of post-operative rehabilitation. this is a control group

Other: Non weight bearing Post-operative

Interventions

this group underwent High tibial osteotomy and started early partial weight bearing post-operative at week 2 using crutches and restricted 20 kg of load for 4 weeks. Quadriceps strengthening exercises, continues flexion and extension of the knee were added also to this protocol of post-operative rehabilitation.

Early weight bearing group

the group underwent High tibial osteotomy and started weight bearing post-operative at week 6. Quadriceps strengthening exercises, continues flexion and extension of the knee were added also to this protocol of post-operative rehabilitation.

Non weight bearing group

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age from 15 to 60 years old.
  • Medial compartmental knee OA.
  • With or without medial meniscal injury.
  • With or without Cartilage defect.
  • Genu varus from 5-15 degrees .
  • Flexion deformity \< 10 degree .

You may not qualify if:

  • Older than 50 years old and younger than 15 years old.
  • Multiligament injury.
  • Lateral compartmental knee OA \> GII.
  • Genu varus \< 5 or \> 15 degree .
  • Flexion deformity \> 10 degree .
  • Associated ligamentous reconstruction.
  • Revision HTO.
  • Meniscal root repair.
  • Lateral meniscal injury.
  • Mal-united Fr. Tibial plateau.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut University

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71111, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • 1. Dean, C.S., et al., Clinical outcomes of high tibial osteotomy for knee instability: a systematic review. Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2016. 4(3): p. 2325967116633419. 2. Gkekas, N.K., et al., Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a viable option in young patients with advanced arthritis in a long-term follow-up. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2025. 33(3): p. 1025-1032. 3. Kim, K.J., et al., Biomechanical study of the fixation plates for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surgery & Related Research, 2015. 27(3): p. 181. 4. Van Haeringen, M., et al., Opening-and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy are comparable and early full weight bearing is safe with angular stable plate fixation: a meta-analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023. 31(7): p. 3015-3026. 5. Lansdaal, J.R., et al., Early weight bearing versus delayed weight bearing in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017. 25(12): p. 3670-3678. 6. Jiang, Y., et al., Clinical and radiographic outcomes of double-triangle locking compression plate (DT-LCP) versus T-shaped locking compression plate (T-LCP) in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a follow-up study of over 5 years. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2026. 21(1): p. 1. 7. Saad, R., et al., Six Weeks in Orthopedics: Biological Basis, Clinical Practice, and Evidence for a Universal Benchmark. Orthopedic Reviews, 2026. 18: p. 156461. 8. Elsenosy, A.M., et al., Early Versus Delayed Weight-Bearing Following Tibial Plateau Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 2025. 17(10). 9. Higgins, L.D., et al., Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form. Joint Bone Spine, 2007. 74(6): p. 594-599. 10. Collins, N., et al., Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2016. 24(8): p. 1317-1329. 11. Resch, T., et al., Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without bone void filler: Allograft leads to faster bone union and weight bearing with comparable return to work and sports rates. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2024. 32(7): p. 1785-1797. 12. Rocca, M.S., K. Dias, and J.D. Hughes, Joint preservation procedures: osteotomies about the knee. Annals of joint, 2025. 10: p. 17. 13. Azuma, T., et al., In-hospital grouping rehabilitation of hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy results in shorter hospital stays and better clinical outcomes. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2023. 35(8): p. 575-580. 14. Ueda, Y., et al., Knee extensor strength normalised to body weight is associated with patient-reported outcomes at 12 months after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 2026. 13(1): p. e70625. 15. Nha, K.-W., et al., Fixation stability and stress redistribution following metal block use in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2025. 13: p. 1703140. 16. Franulic, N., et al., Lateral hinge fracture in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a narrative review. EFORT Open Reviews, 2023. 8(7): p. 572-580.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hatem Galal Said, Professor

    Professor of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, Assiut University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mohamed Abdel Radi, Professor

    Professor of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: parallel-groups superiority randomized controlled blinded trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Specialist of Orthopaedic and traumatology, Assiut University Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Posted

May 13, 2026

Study Start

March 8, 2024

Primary Completion

March 8, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2026

Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations