Diathermy On Diabetes Glucose Monitoring Effectiveness
DODGE
Assessing the Impact of Intraoperative Diathermy on Accuracy and Functioning of Glucose Monitoring Systems
1 other identifier
observational
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to investigate if diathermy (a surgical tool that uses electrical energy to control bleeding) has any affect on the accuracy and functioning of continuous glucose monitoring systems in adults and young people with Type 1 Diabetes. The main questions this study aims to answer is - \- Does the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring systems change after use of diathermy? Participants will:
- Have their height and weight checked.
- Provide information about their medical history including type of diabetes, other medical conditions and any current medications they take.
- Have paired glucose meter and sensor glucose measurements taken every 15-75 minutes from up to 4 hours before surgery until up to 4 hours after the end of surgery.
- Have two blood samples taken to measure glucose levels, The first one will be before the use of diathermy and the second will be after the use of diathermy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
May 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
9 months
April 13, 2026
May 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To assess if the Absolute Relative Differences (ARDs) of continuous glucose monitoring systems change after use of diathermy.
The ARD is the absolute difference between the sensor reading (mmol/L) and the reference (glucometer) glucose reading (mmol/L) divided by the reference reading. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference (non-inferiority) following diathermy (where equivalence is defined as less than a 0.05 difference in ARD).
From up to 4 hours prior to the start of surgery to 4 hours after the end of surgery, for no more than a total of 24 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
To assess whether ARD changes following diathermy depending on type of diathermy used (bipolar/monopolar).
From up to 4 hours prior to the start of surgery to 4 hours after the end of surgery, for no more than a total of 24 hours.
To assess whether ARD changes following diathermy when the model is adjusted for glucose trend (rate of change).
From up to 4 hours prior to the start of surgery to 4 hours after the end of surgery, for no more than a total of 24 hours.
To assess whether ARD changes following diathermy when the model is adjusted for duration of surgery (minutes).
From up to 4 hours prior to the start of surgery to 4 hours after the end of surgery, for no more than a total of 24 hours.
To assess whether ARD changes following diathermy when the model is adjusted for site of surgery.
From up to 4 hours prior to the start of surgery to 4 hours after the end of surgery, for no more than a total of 24 hours.
To assess whether ARD changes following diathermy according to participant characteristic of age (years).
From up to 4 hours prior to the start of surgery to 4 hours after the end of surgery, for no more than a total of 24 hours.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with T1DM aged 4 or older routinely using CGM systems undergoing elective surgery
Patients (aged 4 or above) with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus who routinely use a prescribed Abbott Libre-2, Abbott Libre-3, Dexcom G6 or Dexcom G7 glucose monitoring system to monitor glucose concentrations. Patients will scheduled to have a planned admission for elective surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 4 or older with type 1 diabetes mellitus scheduled to undergo elective surgery at Nottingham Universities Hospitals NHS Trust.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
- Planned admission for elective surgery at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.
- Currently routinely using a prescribed Abbott Libre-2, Abbott Libre-3, Dexcom G6 or Dexcom G7 glucose monitoring system to monitor glucose concentrations.
- Aged 4 years or older on the day of surgery.
- Ability to give informed consent / ability of parent/carer to give informed consent (as appropriate).
You may not qualify if:
- Use of paracetamol above maximum dose within 7 days before the scheduled date of surgery (in adults with body weight under 51kg - maximum of 60mg/kg per day, in adults with body weight 51kg and above - maximum of 4g per day, in children - maximum dose as per their age as stated in the British National Formulary for Children)
- Any use of hydroxyurea within 7 days before the scheduled date of surgery
- Use of more than 500mg per day of ascorbic acid / vitamin C within 7 days before the scheduled date of surgery
- Currently taking medications as part of a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Related Publications (9)
Using technology to support diabetes care in hospital (2024). Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care (JBDS-IP) Group and Diabetes Technology Network (DTN). Available at: https://abcd.care/sites/default/files/resources/JBDS_20_Using_Technology_to_Support_Diabetes_Care_in_Hospital_1.pdf (Accessed: 16 May 2024).
BACKGROUNDType 1 diabetes in adults: QS208 (2023). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs208.
BACKGROUNDParkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug;23(8):1143-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143.
PMID: 10937512BACKGROUNDKovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clarke WL. Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. Diabetes Care. 2004 Aug;27(8):1922-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1922.
PMID: 15277418BACKGROUNDHybrid closed loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023 Dec 19. No abstract available. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK613531/
PMID: 40245209BACKGROUNDGregory GA, Robinson TIG, Linklater SE, Wang F, Colagiuri S, de Beaufort C, Donaghue KC; International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas Type 1 Diabetes in Adults Special Interest Group; Magliano DJ, Maniam J, Orchard TJ, Rai P, Ogle GD. Global incidence, prevalence, and mortality of type 1 diabetes in 2021 with projection to 2040: a modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Oct;10(10):741-760. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00218-2. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
PMID: 36113507BACKGROUNDCampbell H, Lakens D. Can we disregard the whole model? Omnibus non-inferiority testing for R2 in multi-variable linear regression and età‚2 in ANOVA. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Feb;74(1):64-89. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12201. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
PMID: 32056209BACKGROUNDKrutkyte G, Rolfes ED, Herzig D, Guensch DP, Schweizer T, Wuethrich PY, Beldi G, Vogt AP, Bally L. Performance of the DEXCOM G7 CGM system during and after major surgery. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Aug;27(8):4586-4589. doi: 10.1111/dom.16462. Epub 2025 May 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 40400093BACKGROUNDAvari P, Lumb A, Flanagan D, Rayman G, Misra S, Dhatariya K, Choudhary P. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Within Hospital: A Scoping Review and Summary of Guidelines From the Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):611-624. doi: 10.1177/19322968221137338. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
PMID: 36444418BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
James M Law, PhD, BMBS
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Nottingham
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Armstrong, BMBS
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2026
First Posted
May 13, 2026
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share