NCT07582575

Brief Summary

Due to demographic changes, the geriatric patient population is growing, leading to a higher incidence of osteoporotic fractures associated with multimorbidity and frailty. Up to 60% of elderly patients are at risk of malnutrition, which is associated with a high rate of post-operative complications, prolonged hospitalisation, poorer return to independence and increased mortality. The NuTra study investigates the prevalence of malnutrition, evaluates screening tools and analyses the impact of protein-rich diets on postoperative outcomes in geriatric trauma. The aim is to develop evidence-based approaches to the prevention and treatment of malnutrition in order to improve the medical outcome and quality of life of geriatric trauma patients and reduce healthcare costs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
218

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 23, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

randomised controlled interventional study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of participants with medical complications during index hospitalization

    Number of participants with one or more medical complications during the index hospitalization, including acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or deep vein thrombosis.

    Day 1 (Baseline, Hospital admission) up to 3 weeks.

  • Number of participants with surgical site infection during index hospitalization

    Number of operatively treated participants with surgical site infection during the index hospitalization, defined according to standard clinical and microbiological criteria.

    Postoperative day 1 up to 3 weeks postoperative.

  • Functional mobility at discharge

    Functional mobility at discharge, categorized as: independent mobilization, mobilization with assistive devices (e.g. walking frame, crutches), assisted standing or bedbound.

    Day 1 (Baseline, Hospital admission) up to 3 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Length of index hospital stay

    Day 1 (Baseline, Hospital admission) up to 3 weeks.

  • Discharge destination at hospital discharge

    At discharge from the index hospital stay, up to 3 weeks

  • In-hospital mortality during the index hospital stay

    Day 1 (Baseline, Hospital admission) up to 3 weeks.

Study Arms (3)

Group A Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Malnourished patients in Group A received a structured protein-enriched nutritional regimen with a targeted total protein intake of 1.5-2.0 g/kg body weight per day

Dietary Supplement: Protein-enriched nutritional regimen with a targeted total protein intake of 1.5-2.0 g/kg body weight per day

Group B Control

NO INTERVENTION

Patients in the malnourished control group (B) received standard hospital whole food diet without targeted protein enrichment or routine provision of oral nutritional supplements

Group C Control

NO INTERVENTION

Patients in the well-nourished control group (C) received standard hospital whole food diet without targeted protein enrichment or routine provision of oral nutritional supplements

Interventions

The intervention group A received a structured protein-enriched nutritional regimen with a targeted total protein intake of 1.5-2.0 g/kg body weight per day, in accordance with current recommendations for older adults with acute illness. This regimen combined three protein-rich main meals per day with oral nutritional supplements providing 20 g protein per serving.

Group A Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged ≥70 years
  • Acute fractures of the proximal humerus, vertebral body, pelvis, acetabulum, proximal femur, or periprosthetic fractures of the lower extremity
  • Admission for acute fracture management
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \<70 years
  • Dementia or relevant cognitive impairment precluding informed consent
  • Progressive malignancy
  • Palliative treatment goals
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tuebingen

Tübingen, 72076, Germany

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Krupp S, Freiberger E, Renner C, Hofmann W. [Assessment of mobility/motor skills in old age : Based on the S1 guideline "Geriatric assessment level 2, living guideline"]. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 May;55(3):239-248. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02060-4. Epub 2022 Apr 20. German.

    PMID: 35441870BACKGROUND
  • Rapp K, Rothenbacher D, Magaziner J, Becker C, Benzinger P, Konig HH, Jaensch A, Buchele G. Risk of Nursing Home Admission After Femoral Fracture Compared With Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and Pneumonia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Aug 1;16(8):715.e7-715.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

    PMID: 26142060BACKGROUND
  • Schoeneberg C, Knobe M, Babst R, Friess T, Volland R, Hartwig E, Schmidt W, Lendemans S, Buecking B; AltersTraumaRegister DGU. [120-day follow-up after proximal femoral fractures-first results from the Geriatric Trauma Registry DGU(R)]. Unfallchirurg. 2020 May;123(5):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-00730-4. German.

    PMID: 31598740BACKGROUND
  • Arkley J, Dixon J, Wilson F, Charlton K, Ollivere BJ, Eardley W. Assessment of Nutrition and Supplementation in Patients With Hip Fractures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Oct 17;10:2151459319879804. doi: 10.1177/2151459319879804. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31667002BACKGROUND
  • Irisawa H, Mizushima T. Relationship between Nutritional Status, Body Composition, Muscle Strength, and Functional Recovery in Patients with Proximal Femur Fracture. Nutrients. 2022 May 30;14(11):2298. doi: 10.3390/nu14112298.

    PMID: 35684096BACKGROUND
  • Bucking B, Neuerburg C, Knobe M, Liener U. [Treatment of patients with fragility fractures]. Unfallchirurg. 2019 Oct;122(10):755-761. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-00707-3. German.

    PMID: 31428807BACKGROUND
  • Kammerlander C, Blauth M, Gosch M, Bocker W. [Co-management in geriatric traumatology]. Orthopade. 2015 Sep;44(9):681-685. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3144-6. German.

    PMID: 26205359BACKGROUND
  • Berk T, Thalmann M, Jensen KO, Schwarzenberg P, Jukema GN, Pape HC, Halvachizadeh S. Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS One. 2023 Jun 9;18(6):e0284320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284320. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37294793BACKGROUND
  • Becker N, Hafner T, Pishnamaz M, Hildebrand F, Kobbe P. Patient-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes following geriatric proximal femur fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):753-761. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01953-8. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

    PMID: 35325262BACKGROUND
  • Walter N, Rupp M, Lang S, Alt V. The epidemiology of fracture-related infections in Germany. Sci Rep. 2021 May 17;11(1):10443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90008-w.

    PMID: 34001973BACKGROUND
  • Malafarina V, Reginster JY, Cabrerizo S, Bruyere O, Kanis JA, Martinez JA, Zulet MA. Nutritional Status and Nutritional Treatment Are Related to Outcomes and Mortality in Older Adults with Hip Fracture. Nutrients. 2018 Apr 30;10(5):555. doi: 10.3390/nu10050555.

    PMID: 29710860BACKGROUND
  • Gumieiro DN, Rafacho BP, Goncalves AF, Tanni SE, Azevedo PS, Sakane DT, Carneiro CA, Gaspardo D, Zornoff LA, Pereira GJ, Paiva SA, Minicucci MF. Mini Nutritional Assessment predicts gait status and mortality 6 months after hip fracture. Br J Nutr. 2013 May;109(9):1657-61. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512003686. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

    PMID: 23017491BACKGROUND
  • Rupp M, Walter N, Pfeifer C, Lang S, Kerschbaum M, Krutsch W, Baumann F, Alt V. The Incidence of Fractures Among the Adult Population of Germany-an Analysis From 2009 through 2019. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Oct 8;118(40):665-669. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0238.

    PMID: 34140088BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective randomized controlled parallel-group interventional study comparing structured nutritional management with standard care in geriatric trauma patients.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2026

First Posted

May 13, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations