NCT07580651

Brief Summary

This project addresses a key safety gap in High-Dose-Rate (HDR) brachytherapy, where very high, localized radiation doses mean that small geometric deviations in catheter placement or radioactive source positioning can cause clinically significant errors. Incident reports from the Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System (RO-ILS) of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and guidelines from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 59 (AAPM TG-59) identify these events-often occurring between imaging and treatment delivery-as among the most critical. Unlike external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy lacks a prior phantom-based verification step, making in vivo dosimetry the only real-time method to confirm delivered dose and detect anomalies in dwell time or source position. International bodies such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recommend this approach for quality management and accident prevention. Multipoint plastic scintillation detectors (mPSD) offer water-equivalent, real-time measurements and can enable three-dimensional (3D) radioactive source tracking, but their clinical use remains limited due to integration challenges and the absence of well-defined alert thresholds. The project aims to implement a real-time in vivo monitoring solution using an mPSD at the Centre régional intégré de cancérologie (CRIC) of Lévis, Québec (QC) for HDR gynecological and prostate brachytherapy. Objectives include: (1) demonstrating clinical feasibility and integration within existing clinical workflows; (2) validating the accuracy and precision of dose, dwell-time, and source-position measurements under clinical conditions; and (3) developing practical alert thresholds to identify common deviations. The central hypothesis is that mPSD technology can provide reliable, reproducible real-time measurements without lengthening procedures or disrupting clinical workflow. The methodology relies on adapting the HYPERSCINT® platform for HDR in vivo use. A custom mPSD, consisting of several scintillators along a single optical fiber, will be insertable into a 6-French (6F) catheter. Phase 1 focuses on feasibility and integration, including HDR-specific calibration, definition of detector insertion scenarios, integration of acquisition hardware, and staff training. Phase 2 validates performance in at least 20 patients. Planned treatment parameters and time-stamped detector signals acquired at 1-10 hertz (Hz) will be used to reconstruct delivered dose, dwell times, and source-to-detector distances. Measurement accuracy and reproducibility will be quantified using mixed-effects statistical models. Phase 3 establishes preliminary alert thresholds based on deviations in dose, time, and position, along with visualization tools such as Bland-Altman plots, although these thresholds will not be applied clinically during the study. Expected outcomes include demonstrated feasibility of in vivo mPSD monitoring, quantitative performance metrics with confidence intervals, identification of influential factors and operational recommendations, preliminary alert thresholds with reporting templates, and a roadmap for sustainable deployment in Lévis and other centers. Scientific outputs will also be produced for dissemination across the Santé Québec network.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
16mo left

Started Jan 2027

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2027

Expected
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of brachytherapy treatments with successful scintillation detector-based measurement

    Feasibility will be assessed by determining whether a scintillation detector successfully acquires a measurement during brachytherapy treatment. Radiation emitted from the brachytherapy source induces optical scintillation in the detector. The emitted light is transmitted via optical fiber and collected by a spectrometer located outside the treatment room. A successful measurement is defined as the acquisition of scintillation data that can be analyzed to infer clinically relevant parameters, including either the radiation dose rate as a function of time and/or the radioactive source position during treatment delivery. The outcome will be reported as the number and proportion of treatments with successful measurements.

    From the patient anesthesia at the beginning of the brachytherapy procedure to the end of brachytherapy radiation delivery on the same day.

Study Arms (1)

In-vivo dosimetry

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this treatment arm will receive the same treatment and care as patients outside of the protocol, but will have their treatment monitored by a plastic scintillation detector placed inside or at close proximity of the tumor.

Device: Brachytherapy treatment monitoring using a plastic scintillation detector

Interventions

Typical brachytherapy treatments are conducted without dose or source position monitoring in real-time. This intervention will assess the feasibility of using a scintillation detector to that end.

In-vivo dosimetry

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients receiving prostate brachytherapy treatment, or female user receiving gynecological brachytherapy treatment for cervical cancer.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a Clostridium difficile infection or any other high-risk positive infection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Fonseca GP, Johansen JG, Smith RL, Beaulieu L, Beddar S, Kertzscher G, Verhaegen F, Tanderup K. In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep 28;16:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.002. eCollection 2020 Oct.

    PMID: 33458336BACKGROUND
  • Linares Rosales HM, Duguay-Drouin P, Archambault L, Beddar S, Beaulieu L. Optimization of a multipoint plastic scintillator dosimeter for high dose rate brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2412-2421. doi: 10.1002/mp.13498. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

    PMID: 30891803BACKGROUND
  • Linares Rosales HM, Johansen JG, Kertzscher G, Tanderup K, Beaulieu L, Beddar S. 3D source tracking and error detection in HDR using two independent scintillator dosimetry systems. Med Phys. 2021 May;48(5):2095-2107. doi: 10.1002/mp.14607. Epub 2021 Mar 28.

    PMID: 33222208BACKGROUND
  • Therriault-Proulx F, Beddar S, Beaulieu L. On the use of a single-fiber multipoint plastic scintillation detector for 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2013 Jun;40(6):062101. doi: 10.1118/1.4803510.

    PMID: 23718599BACKGROUND
  • Kubo HD, Glasgow GP, Pethel TD, Thomadsen BR, Williamson JF. High dose-rate brachytherapy treatment delivery: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 59. Med Phys. 1998 Apr;25(4):375-403. doi: 10.1118/1.598232.

    PMID: 9571605BACKGROUND
  • Hoopes DJ, Dicker AP, Eads NL, Ezzell GA, Fraass BA, Kwiatkowski TM, Lash K, Patton GA, Piotrowski T, Tomlinson C, Ford EC. RO-ILS: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System: A report from the first year of experience. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep-Oct;5(5):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

    PMID: 26362705BACKGROUND
  • Therriault-Proulx F, Archambault L, Beaulieu L, Beddar S. Development of a novel multi-point plastic scintillation detector with a single optical transmission line for radiation dose measurement. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):7147-59. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/7147. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

    PMID: 23060069BACKGROUND
  • Beaulieu L, Beddar S. Review of plastic and liquid scintillation dosimetry for photon, electron, and proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2016 Oct 21;61(20):R305-R343. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/20/R305. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

    PMID: 27694714BACKGROUND
  • Yamada Y, Rogers L, Demanes DJ, Morton G, Prestidge BR, Pouliot J, Cohen GN, Zaider M, Ghilezan M, Hsu IC; American Brachytherapy Society. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2011.09.008.

    PMID: 22265435BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2026

First Posted

May 12, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 12, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Sharing of individual participant data, under Quebec Law, is heavily regulated, especially for data shared outside of the Province. For regulatory simplicity, the investigators would prefer not sharing the individual participant data.