NCT07578324

Brief Summary

Transperineal prostate biopsy is a safe and effective method of diagnosing prostate cancer. When performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting, it can cause significant pain, particularly during the periprostatic nerve block - the injection of local anaesthetic around the prostate. Better pain management during this procedure may improve patient comfort and encourage wider use of the transperineal approach. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, low-cost method of pain relief that works by delivering mild electrical impulses through the skin. A preceding pilot study at our centre (n=84) found that TENS used alongside local anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower pain scores during periprostatic nerve block and biopsy sampling, with no device-related complications. This study aims to confirm these findings in a larger, formally powered, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active TENS or sham TENS (electrodes applied but no electrical current delivered) in addition to standard local anaesthesia. Neither the participant nor the operating urologist will know which group the participant is in. Pain scores are written down by the participant himself, so nobody asks him for a number during the procedure. Stimulation may feel strong, weak or not noticeable at all, and feeling nothing does not mean a participant is in the inactive group. Pain intensity will be assessed at four stages of the procedure using a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Participants will be followed up at 30 days after the biopsy.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Aug 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress20%
Aug 2026May 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 12, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2027

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

August 13, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 3, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve StimulationTENSTransperineal Prostate BiopsyLocal AnaesthesiaPeriprostatic Nerve BlockPain ManagementMRI-Ultrasound Fusion BiopsyRandomized Controlled Trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • NRS Pain Score During Periprostatic Nerve Block

    Patient-reported pain intensity during periprostatic nerve block (PNB), assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain). PNB consists of periprostatic infiltration ( 10 mL 1% lignocaine under real-time ultrasound guidance). The participant self-records the score on a paper form on a clipboard, within 30 seconds of the operator announcing completion of the block in fixed wording, and before the next procedural stage begins. The operator is blinded to allocation and asks no question about pain. A standardised explanation of the NRS and of the form is given to every participant before the procedure.

    Immediately after completion of periprostatic nerve block (intraoperative)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • NRS Pain Score During Ultrasound Probe Insertion

    Immediately after ultrasound probe insertion (intraoperative)

  • NRS Pain Score During Perineal Infiltration

    Immediately after perineal infiltration (intraoperative)

  • NRS Pain Score During Biopsy Sampling

    Immediately after fusion-targeted biopsy sampling (intraoperative)

  • Procedural Safety and Tolerability

    Through 30-day follow-up

  • Willingness to Repeat the Procedure

    30-day follow-up visit

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Preoperative state anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - State subscale, STAI-S)

    Administered before the procedure.

  • NRS-Anxiety

    Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change.

  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-13)

    Before the procedure

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active TENS

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive active transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, using Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Parameters: symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse, 80 Hz, 180 µs pulse duration, amplitude individually titrated to highest comfortably tolerable level. Two 5x5 cm electrodes placed in the perineal region. TENS continued throughout all procedural stages and discontinued after biopsy sampling. Standard local anaesthesia administered to all participants: 10 mL 2% lignocaine gel transrectally, followed by 20 mL 1% lignocaine using full needle-path infiltration technique.

Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Sham TENS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants receive sham TENS. Electrodes placed identically to the active group. Device activated in identical manner but delivers no electrical current. Device display not visible to participant; device produces no sound. Standard local anaesthesia identical to active group.

Device: Sham Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Interventions

Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse; 80 Hz; 180 µs pulse duration; amplitude individually titrated. Two 5x5 cm electrodes in perineal region. Initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, continued throughout procedure.

Active TENS

Identical electrode placement to active group. Device activated without delivering electrical current. Indistinguishable from active TENS by participant, operator, and outcome assessor.

Sham TENS

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male patients aged 40 years or older
  • Indication for prostate biopsy: elevated serum PSA (as per institutional protocol and EAU guidelines) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)
  • Suspicious lesion on multiparametric MRI classified as PI-RADS score 3 or higher (version 2.1)
  • Scheduled for transperineal MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer (surgical, radiotherapy, hormonal or focal therapy)
  • Contraindications to TENS: cutaneous damage or dermatologic conditions at electrode application sites; cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or congestive heart failure; history of epilepsy or seizure disorder; metallic implants near the stimulation site; malignancy at or near the stimulation site
  • Contraindications to transperineal biopsy: active urinary tract infection; bleeding disorder or ongoing anticoagulation not amendable to bridging; anatomical abnormalities preventing safe prostatic access
  • Known allergy or intolerance to local anaesthetic agents or biopsy-related materials
  • Severe comorbidities or unstable medical condition compromising procedural safety
  • Inability to complete questionnaires
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrolment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk

Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-214, Poland

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic NeoplasmsDiseasePain, ProceduralAgnosia

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Blinded: participants; the operating urologist, who is also the PI (Care Provider, Investigator); the statistician. NRS scores are self-recorded by the participant on a paper form at moments cued by the blinded operator, so the outcome assessor is the blinded participant and no staff member asks for a score. Not blinded: one nurse, who opens the envelope and operates the device, records no outcomes and never handles the form. Participant: identical electrode placement and identical titration ritual in both arms (same dial sequence, pauses, wording; no current in sham); device silent; display not visible. Care Provider: titration completed before the operator enters the room; opaque screen between device and operative field; display taped; participants told not to comment on device sensation; the operator announces each stage in fixed wording and asks nothing about pain. Investigator: PI blinded to allocation; statistician receives data coded A/B.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two parallel groups (1:1 allocation ratio): active TENS plus standard local anaesthesia versus sham TENS plus standard local anaesthesia.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Urologist, Department of Urology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2026

First Posted

May 11, 2026

Study Start

August 12, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Last Updated

August 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication will be made publicly available at the Open Science Framework (OSF) at the time of publication.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning at time of publication, no end date.
Access Criteria
Publicly available without restriction via Open Science Framework (OSF).
More information

Locations