TENS During Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
TENS 2
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation as an Adjunct to Local Anaesthesia During Transperineal MRI-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Triple-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transperineal prostate biopsy is a safe and effective method of diagnosing prostate cancer. When performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting, it can cause significant pain, particularly during the periprostatic nerve block - the injection of local anaesthetic around the prostate. Better pain management during this procedure may improve patient comfort and encourage wider use of the transperineal approach. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, low-cost method of pain relief that works by delivering mild electrical impulses through the skin. A preceding pilot study at our centre (n=84) found that TENS used alongside local anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower pain scores during periprostatic nerve block and biopsy sampling, with no device-related complications. This study aims to confirm these findings in a larger, formally powered, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active TENS or sham TENS (electrodes applied but no electrical current delivered) in addition to standard local anaesthesia. Neither the participant nor the operating urologist will know which group the participant is in. Pain scores are written down by the participant himself, so nobody asks him for a number during the procedure. Stimulation may feel strong, weak or not noticeable at all, and feeling nothing does not mean a participant is in the inactive group. Pain intensity will be assessed at four stages of the procedure using a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Participants will be followed up at 30 days after the biopsy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 12, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
August 13, 2026
August 1, 2026
8 months
May 3, 2026
August 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NRS Pain Score During Periprostatic Nerve Block
Patient-reported pain intensity during periprostatic nerve block (PNB), assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain). PNB consists of periprostatic infiltration ( 10 mL 1% lignocaine under real-time ultrasound guidance). The participant self-records the score on a paper form on a clipboard, within 30 seconds of the operator announcing completion of the block in fixed wording, and before the next procedural stage begins. The operator is blinded to allocation and asks no question about pain. A standardised explanation of the NRS and of the form is given to every participant before the procedure.
Immediately after completion of periprostatic nerve block (intraoperative)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
NRS Pain Score During Ultrasound Probe Insertion
Immediately after ultrasound probe insertion (intraoperative)
NRS Pain Score During Perineal Infiltration
Immediately after perineal infiltration (intraoperative)
NRS Pain Score During Biopsy Sampling
Immediately after fusion-targeted biopsy sampling (intraoperative)
Procedural Safety and Tolerability
Through 30-day follow-up
Willingness to Repeat the Procedure
30-day follow-up visit
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Preoperative state anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - State subscale, STAI-S)
Administered before the procedure.
NRS-Anxiety
Administered before the procedure and immediately after biopsy sampling to assess pre-to-post procedural anxiety change.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-13)
Before the procedure
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active TENS
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive active transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, using Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Parameters: symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse, 80 Hz, 180 µs pulse duration, amplitude individually titrated to highest comfortably tolerable level. Two 5x5 cm electrodes placed in the perineal region. TENS continued throughout all procedural stages and discontinued after biopsy sampling. Standard local anaesthesia administered to all participants: 10 mL 2% lignocaine gel transrectally, followed by 20 mL 1% lignocaine using full needle-path infiltration technique.
Sham TENS
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants receive sham TENS. Electrodes placed identically to the active group. Device activated in identical manner but delivers no electrical current. Device display not visible to participant; device produces no sound. Standard local anaesthesia identical to active group.
Interventions
Cefar Rehab X2 device (Class II, Type BF). Symmetrical biphasic compensated pulse; 80 Hz; 180 µs pulse duration; amplitude individually titrated. Two 5x5 cm electrodes in perineal region. Initiated 3-5 minutes before local anaesthesia, continued throughout procedure.
Identical electrode placement to active group. Device activated without delivering electrical current. Indistinguishable from active TENS by participant, operator, and outcome assessor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male patients aged 40 years or older
- Indication for prostate biopsy: elevated serum PSA (as per institutional protocol and EAU guidelines) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)
- Suspicious lesion on multiparametric MRI classified as PI-RADS score 3 or higher (version 2.1)
- Scheduled for transperineal MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia
- Ability to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment for prostate cancer (surgical, radiotherapy, hormonal or focal therapy)
- Contraindications to TENS: cutaneous damage or dermatologic conditions at electrode application sites; cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or congestive heart failure; history of epilepsy or seizure disorder; metallic implants near the stimulation site; malignancy at or near the stimulation site
- Contraindications to transperineal biopsy: active urinary tract infection; bleeding disorder or ongoing anticoagulation not amendable to bridging; anatomical abnormalities preventing safe prostatic access
- Known allergy or intolerance to local anaesthetic agents or biopsy-related materials
- Severe comorbidities or unstable medical condition compromising procedural safety
- Inability to complete questionnaires
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrolment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Urology, Medical University of Gdansk
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-214, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinded: participants; the operating urologist, who is also the PI (Care Provider, Investigator); the statistician. NRS scores are self-recorded by the participant on a paper form at moments cued by the blinded operator, so the outcome assessor is the blinded participant and no staff member asks for a score. Not blinded: one nurse, who opens the envelope and operates the device, records no outcomes and never handles the form. Participant: identical electrode placement and identical titration ritual in both arms (same dial sequence, pauses, wording; no current in sham); device silent; display not visible. Care Provider: titration completed before the operator enters the room; opaque screen between device and operative field; display taped; participants told not to comment on device sensation; the operator announces each stage in fixed wording and asks nothing about pain. Investigator: PI blinded to allocation; statistician receives data coded A/B.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Urologist, Department of Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2026
First Posted
May 11, 2026
Study Start
August 12, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning at time of publication, no end date.
- Access Criteria
- Publicly available without restriction via Open Science Framework (OSF).
De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication will be made publicly available at the Open Science Framework (OSF) at the time of publication.