HOLA Intervention Pilot
Heightening Oncologist-Latino/a Cancer Patient Alliances (HOLA) Intervention Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
32
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The patient-clinician relationship is fundamental to providing high-quality patient-centered medical care. A therapeutic alliance (TA) is a patient clinician relationship that is characterized by mutual caring, trust, understanding, and respect. A strong TA between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer is associated with several positive health outcomes for patients and caregivers. However, our previous work showed a stark disparity in the TA for Latino/a patients with advanced cancer vs. non-Latino/a white patients. The overall objective of this study is to pilot the Heightening Oncologist-Latino/a cancer patient Alliances (HOLA) intervention to assess its feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, and the preliminary efficacy of the intervention's impact on the TA between oncologists and their Latino/a patients with advanced cancer. The HOLA intervention will teach oncologists specific evidence based skills and behaviors for promoting a TA with Latino/a advanced cancer patients through the integration of patient-centered communication techniques that are aligned with Latino/a cultural values via commonly encountered clinical scenarios. We will pilot test the HOLA intervention with eight oncologists and 32 of their patients, half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist who will be randomized to receive the TA intervention (n=4 oncologists), and half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist (n=4 oncologists) who was randomized to usual care. The feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the intervention will be assessed using standard measures. Preliminary efficacy will be determined by comparing the mean TA scores for the oncologists who were randomized to receive the intervention to the mean TA scores for the oncologists who were randomized to usual care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
May 8, 2026
May 1, 2026
Same day
May 4, 2026
May 4, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Feasibility of Intervention
Will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure, which consists of 4 questions: 1. \[Intervention\] seems implementable. 2. \[Intervention\] seems possible. 3. \[Intervention\] seems doable. 4. \[Intervention\] seems easy to use. Responses are on a 5-point Likert Scale, ranging from completely agree to completely disagree.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 1 to 3 months
Accessibility
Will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure, which consists of 4 questions: 1\) \[Intervention\] meets my approval, 2) \[Intervention\] is appealing to me, 3) I like \[Intervention\], 4) I welcome \[Intervention\]. Responses are on 3 5-point Likert Scale, ranging from completely agree to completely disagree.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 1 to 3 months
Appropriateness of Intervention
Will be assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure, which consists of 4 questions: 1\) \[Intervention\] seems fitting, 2) \[Intervention\] seems suitable, 3) \[Intervention\] seems applicable, 4) \[Intervention\] seems like a good match. Responses are on a 5-point Likert Scale, ranging from completely agree to completely disagree.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 1 to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Preliminary efficacy of the intervention
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 1 to 3 months
Study Arms (4)
Oncologists
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe HOLA intervention is aimed at oncologists and consists of a one hour interactive didactic session and a one-hour small group session. Pre-recorded video vignettes and role playing with a trained moderator will be incorporated both into the interactive group didactic session and the small group session.
Oncologists (Usual Care)
NO INTERVENTIONWe will pilot test the HOLA intervention with eight oncologists and 32 of their patients, half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist who will be randomized to receive the TA intervention (n=4 oncologists), and half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist (n=4 oncologists) who was randomized to usual care.
Patients
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will pilot test the HOLA intervention with eight oncologists and 32 of their patients, half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist who will be randomized to receive the TA intervention (n=4 oncologists), and half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist (n=4 oncologists) who was randomized to usual care.
Patients (Usual Care)
NO INTERVENTIONWe will pilot test the HOLA intervention with eight oncologists and 32 of their patients, half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist who will be randomized to receive the TA intervention (n=4 oncologists), and half (n=16 patients) who are under the care of an oncologist (n=4 oncologists) who was randomized to usual care.
Interventions
The HOLA intervention is aimed at oncologists and consists of a one hour interactive didactic session and a one-hour small group session. Pre-recorded video vignettes and role playing with a trained moderator will be incorporated both into the interactive group didactic session and the small group session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- identifying as ethnically Latino;
- locally advanced or metastatic cancer (pancreaticobiliary, esophagogastric, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung, or gynecological cancer) AND have experienced disease progression on at least first-line chemotherapy
- ability to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- not fluent in English or Spanish;
- severely cognitively impaired (as measured by Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire scores of \< 6 during screening);
- too ill or weak to complete the interviews (as judged by interviewer);
- children and young adults under age 21
- patients deemed inappropriate for the study by their treating oncologist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Tergas AI, Prigerson HG, Penedo FJ, Maciejewski PK. Human Connection: Oncologist Characteristics and Behaviors Associated With Therapeutic Bonding With Latino Patients With Advanced Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Jan;20(1):111-122. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00329. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
PMID: 37988650BACKGROUNDTergas AI, Prigerson HG, Shen MJ, Neugut AI, Maciejewski PK. Disparities in Therapeutic Alliance Among Latino Immigrants With Advanced Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Sep;64(3):e173-e176. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 11. No abstract available.
PMID: 35700931BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Division of Gynecologic Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2026
First Posted
May 8, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05