NCT07573800

Brief Summary

This study could contribute to the advancements in healthcare by exploring the innovative intervention, which is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Investigating its impact on cardiovascular and locomotor outcomes could give rise to new non-pharmacological interventions for health promotion, disease prevention, and rehabilitation.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started May 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress3%
May 2026Jan 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2026

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

tDCScardiovascularlocomotor unitscommunity-dwellerselderly

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

    The 10MWT is broadly used in preventive care and rehabilitation centers; it is evaluated by measuring participant speed and counting the number of steps taken within a given time period. This measurement method includes walking a certain section set on a smooth floor at the normal or maximum speed. After this, walking time and number of steps taken are to be measured

    baseline, week 1, and week 5

  • Blood Pressure Monitor

    A sphygmomanometer is used to measure systolic and diastolic blood pressure before and after intervention sessions. The modified sphygmomanometer showed excellent test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.996.

    baseline, week 1, and week 5

  • 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    It is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. Any change in performance capacity are determined based on the distance covered in six minutes. The 6MWT is a practically performed simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment needed. It helps to evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, systemic and peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism

    baseline, week 1, and 5

  • Short Physical performance battery

    It consists of 3 timed components: 1) a 4-m usual pace walk, 2) a 5-repetition chair stand without using one's arms, and 3) a progressive test of standing balance. It is an objective measurement instrument of balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults. The final total SPPB scores ranged between 4 and 12, with 4 to 6 representing the low, 7 to 9 the middle, and 10 to 12 the best performance.

    baseline, week 1, and 5

  • Heart rate variability (HRV)

    Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in community-dwellers is a critical, non-invasive marker of autonomic nervous system function, with lower HRV values consistently predicting higher cardiovascular risk, mortality, and functional decline. Among community-dwelling older adults, reduced HRV is strongly associated with adverse health outcomes such as frailty, cognitive impairment, and depression.

    baseline, week 1, and 5

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • tDCS Safety Screening Questionnaire

    baseline, week 1, and 5

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: tDCSOther: Sham stimulation

Group 2

SHAM COMPARATOR
Other: tDCSOther: Sham stimulation

Interventions

tDCSOTHER

The focal electrodes of 25-35 cm² will be placed on M1, identifying via the 10/20 EEG system.

Group 1Group 2

Sham stimulation of the M1 area by using the 25-35 square centimeter electrodes.

Group 1Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to ambulate independently (with or without assistive device)
  • Cognitively intact (MoCA score ≥ 24)
  • PAR-Q

You may not qualify if:

  • History of seizures or epilepsy
  • Implanted metallic or electronic devices (e.g., pacemakers, ICD)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (\>180/110 mmHg)
  • Severe cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, or orthopedic disorders limiting participation
  • Active skin conditions at electrode sites
  • Recent hospitalization (\<3 months)
  • Ongoing hormonal therapy, anticoagulants, or psychotropic medications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pakistan Railway Hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Rodrigues B, Barboza CA, Moura EG, Ministro G, Ferreira-Melo SE, Castano JB, Ruberti OM, De Amorim RFB, Moreno H Junior. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates autonomic nervous system and reduces ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensives. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2021 May 19;43(4):320-327. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2021.1871916. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

    PMID: 33423544BACKGROUND
  • da Silva VCC, da Silva Areas FZ, Lopes ALRB, de Almeida E Val FF, da Costa AG, Dos Santos JCC, Ferreira JMBB, Peixoto Tinoco Areas G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation associated with aerobic exercise on the functional and physical capacity of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: ELETRIC study protocol. Trials. 2023 Nov 17;24(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07694-2.

    PMID: 37974293BACKGROUND
  • Choi BJ, Lee H, Kang N. Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Gait Performances in Healthy Older Adults? A Meta-Analysis. J Integr Neurosci. 2025 Jun 19;24(6):36636. doi: 10.31083/JIN36636.

    PMID: 40613366BACKGROUND
  • Keller-Ross ML, Chantigian DP, Nemanich S, Gillick BT. Cardiovascular Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Bimanual Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2021 Jan 1;33(1):11-16. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000762.

    PMID: 33337767BACKGROUND
  • Bornheim S, Thibaut A, Beaudart C, Maquet P, Croisier JL, Kaux JF. Evaluating the effects of tDCS in stroke patients using functional outcomes: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jan;44(1):13-23. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1759703. Epub 2020 May 12.

    PMID: 32394750BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Officials

  • Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sumaiyah Obaid, MSPT

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2026

First Posted

May 7, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations