NCT07573124

Brief Summary

Lumbar radiculopathy (LR), often caused by disc herniation, results in significant pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) is a manual technique that has shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction is used to reduce nerve compression, though its standalone effectiveness is debated. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the combined effect of SMWLM plus mechanical lumbar traction against SMWLM alone, both administered with conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes will be assessed over 4 weeks to determine if the combined intervention offers superior pain relief, functional improvement, and range of motion in patients with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Apr 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress17%
Apr 2026Nov 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 15, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 15, 2026

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Lumbar radiculopathyMulligan mobilizationMechanical lumbar tractionPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Intensity

    The average pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) over the previous 24 hours is rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The patient is asked to provide current, best, and worst pain ratings; the mean of the three ratings will be used.

    Baseline, Week 2 (mid-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention)

  • Functional Disability

    Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire (MOLBPQ) is a validated 10-item questionnaire measuring how much low back pain has affected daily activities (e.g., walking, sitting, lifting, sleeping). Each item scores 0-5; total sum is expressed as a percentage (0-50). Higher scores indicate greater disability.

    Baseline, Week 2, Week 4

  • Hip Range of Motion

    Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test is a pain-free hip flexion angle (in degrees) measured with a universal goniometer during the passive straight leg raise test. The examiner stops the movement at the point where the patient first reports concordant radicular pain or tightness. Standardized goniometer placement relative to the femur ensures consistency.

    Baseline, Week 2, Week 4

Study Arms (2)

SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), mechanical lumbar traction, and conventional physiotherapy.

Procedure: Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM)Procedure: Mechanical Lumbar TractionProcedure: Conventional Physical Therapy

SMWLM + Conventional Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) and conventional physiotherapy without mechanical traction.

Procedure: Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM)Procedure: Conventional Physical Therapy

Interventions

Following SMWLM, the patient is placed supine in a Fowler position with hips and knees flexed to 90°, lower legs supported. An intermittent distractive force (up to 50% of body weight) is delivered using an automatic traction device (e.g., PH-T3021). The traction cycle consists of a 30-second hold and a 10-second rest, with a 1-minute ramp-up and ramp-down, for a total of 15 minutes.

Also known as: Intermittent lumbar traction, automatic traction therapy
SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy

The therapist positions the patient side-lying on the unaffected side with the affected leg slightly abducted. A sustained transverse manual glide is applied to the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved lumbar segment (e.g., L4 for an L4-L5 lesion). Simultaneously, the patient actively lifts the leg into hip flexion and knee extension, ensuring the movement remains pain-free. Dosage: 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions per treatment session.

Also known as: Mulligan mobilization, SMWLM, spinal mobilization with limb movement
SMWLM + Conventional TherapySMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy

All participants receive a standardized conventional therapy program consisting of: * Moist hot pack on the lumbar region for 10 minutes. * Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with 50-100 ms pulse width for 10 minutes, electrodes placed over the lumbar spine and affected lower limb. * Supervised therapeutic exercises: heel sitting (lumbar flexion), drawing-in maneuver, bridging, and pelvic tilting (2 sets of 5-7 repetitions per session). * Home exercise program: same exercises performed daily, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with progression as tolerated.

Also known as: Standard physiotherapy, hot pack and TENS, therapeutic exercise
SMWLM + Conventional TherapySMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 20-50 years
  • Male and female participants
  • Unilateral radiculopathy due to L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc bulge, confirmed by clinical examination and MRI
  • Symptom duration of 4 weeks to 6 months
  • Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test on the affected leg (\<70° of hip flexion)
  • Pain intensity \<7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; mild to moderate pain)

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive impairment, dementia, central cord signs
  • Inflammatory or degenerative spine conditions
  • Spine surgery within the last 6 months
  • Pregnant women in the later half of 2nd trimester or 3rd trimester
  • Muscular involvement (e.g., Deep Gluteal syndrome, Piriformis syndrome)
  • Currently receiving medications or other contemporaneous treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

DMC Physiotherapy Clinic

Islamabad, Capital, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Fourre A, Monnier F, Ris L, Telliez F, Michielsen J, Roussel N, Hage R. Low-back related leg pain: is the nerve guilty? How to differentiate the underlying pain mechanism. J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Apr;31(2):57-63. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2092266. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

    PMID: 35735104BACKGROUND
  • Roberts KE, Beckenkamp PR, Ferreira ML, Duncan GE, Calais-Ferreira L, Gatt JM, Ferreira P. Positive lifestyle behaviours and emotional health factors are associated with low back pain resilience. Eur Spine J. 2022 Dec;31(12):3616-3626. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07404-7. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

    PMID: 36208321BACKGROUND
  • Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

    PMID: 28192789BACKGROUND
  • Vanti C, Panizzolo A, Turone L, Guccione AA, Violante FS, Pillastrini P, Bertozzi L. Effectiveness of Mechanical Traction for Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3):pzaa231. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa231.

    PMID: 33382419BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Radiculopathy

Interventions

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationExercise Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and AnalgesiaAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient Care

Study Officials

  • Muhammad Haris, DPT

    Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University Islamabad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dr Muhammad Mustafa, MSPT

    Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University Islamabad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kinza Afzal, DPT

    Hamdard University Islamabad Campus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Muhammad Haris, DPT

CONTACT

Dr Muhammad Mustafa, MSPT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
No blinding is feasible given the nature of the physical interventions.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two-arm parallel-group design comparing an experimental group (SMWLM + mechanical lumbar traction + conventional therapy) with an active comparator group (SMWLM + conventional therapy).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2026

First Posted

May 7, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 15, 2026

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in published articles will be shared. This includes the demographic data, baseline characteristics, and all primary outcome measures (NPRS pain scores, Straight Leg Raise goniometry angles, and Modified Oswestry Disability scores) at the three assessment time points. The shared data will be accompanied by a data dictionary explaining all variable names and values.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and will remain available for 2 years.
Access Criteria
Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to the Principal Investigator, Dr. Muhammad Haris, at drm.harispt@gmail.com. To gain access, data requestors must sign a data access agreement that includes commitments to use the data only for the specified research purpose, to maintain appropriate data security, and not to attempt to re-identify participants. A review of the proposal by the study team is required prior to approval.

Locations